Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:58:33.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) Root Buds Following Emergence from Lateral Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Elizabeth J. Stamm-Katovich
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
David D. Biesboer
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

In common milkweed, the development of subterranean root buds on excised root segments, following emergence from the parent root, is characterized by development of nodes and internodes followed by internode expansion. Transverse sections of root buds reveal that bicollateral vascular bundles as well as leaf traces and gaps are well developed in buds from 3-month-old plants. Strands of xylem and phloem connect the parent root and root bud in both inhibited and noninhibited root buds. Pitted primary tracheary elements, characteristic of developmentally advanced primary xylem, are present in these traces. The occurrence of a well-developed vascular system throughout the root bud and between the parent root and bud provides evidence that retardation of growth of inhibited root buds in common milkweed is not caused by anatomical constraints.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ali, A. and Fletcher, R. A. 1970. Xylem differentiation in inhibited cotyledonary buds of soybeans. Can. J. Bot. 48:11391140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1970. Life history of common milkweed. WSSA Abstr. No. 12.Google Scholar
3. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1970. The biology of Canadian weeds. 19. Asclepias syriaca L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:579589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Foster, A. S. 1928. Salient features of the problem of bud scale morphology. Cambridge Phil. Soc. Biol. Rev. 3:123164.Google Scholar
5. Groh, H. 1943. Notes on common milkweed. Sci. Agric. 25:463481.Google Scholar
6. Panigrahi, B. M. and Audus, L. J. 1966. Apical dominance in Vicia faba . Ann. Bot. 30:457473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Peterson, R. L. 1975. The initiation and development of root buds. Page 125161 in. Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. T., ed. The Development and Function of Roots. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Polowick, P. L. and Raju, M.V.S. 1982. The origin and development of root buds in Asclepias syriaca . Can. J. Bot. 60:21192125.Google Scholar
9. Raju, M.V.S. and Marchuk, W. N. 1977. Experimental studies of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) III. Xylem development in relation to the hypocotylary bud growth. Bot. Gaz. 138(3):305311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Sorokin, H. P. and Thimann, K. V. 1964. The histological basis of inhibition of axillary buds in Pisum sativum and the effects of auxins and kinetin on xylem development. Protoplasma. 59:326350.Google Scholar
11. Stamm, E. J. and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Characterization of correlatively inhibited root buds of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.). WSSA Abstr. No. 28.Google Scholar
12. Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1985. Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption and translocation in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 33:299305.Google Scholar