Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:23:00.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degradation of Pendimethalin in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert L. Zimdahl ,
Pietro Catizone  and
Ann C. Butcher
Robert L. Zimdahl
Affiliation:
Weed Res. Lab., Dep. Botany and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Pietro Catizone
Affiliation:
Institute of General Agronomy and Cultivation of Field Crops, Univ. of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy
Ann C. Butcher
Affiliation:
Weed Res. Lab., Dep. Botany and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] degradation in three soils did not follow first-order kinetics but could be described by a quadratic model. Degradation increased as soil temperature increased in the order 10, 20, 35, and 30C. The rate was the same as 75 and 100% field capacity but slower at 50%. At the same temperature and soil moisture the influence of soil type was small. Based on chemical analysis of soil from field and laboratory studies, the half-life was approximately 47 days. Based on biological analyses of soil, the half-life was 78 to 111 days.

Keywords

Biological assayfirst order kineticssoil temperaturesoil moisture
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 408 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 709 pp.Google Scholar
2. Flom, D. G. and Miller, S. D. 1978. Persistence of dinitroaniline herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:35–36.Google Scholar
3. Gibson, R. D. and Hamilton, K. C. 1977. Dinitroaniline herbicide persistence under fallow and irrigated conditions. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 30:52–54.Google Scholar
4. Gingerich, L. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1976. Soil persistence of isopropalin and oryzalin. Weed Sci. 24:431–434.Google Scholar
5. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of dinitroaniline type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373–381.Google Scholar
7. Ndon, B. A. 1978. Residual effects of dinitroaniline herbicide treatment in peas, sweet corn and buckwheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:172.Google Scholar
8. Nelson, J. E. 1980. Residues of pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N 4, N 4-dipropylsulfanilamide) in soil organic matter. Diss. Abstr. Int. B40.7, 2924.Google Scholar
9. Parochetti, J. V. and Dec, G. W. Jr. 1978. Photodecomposition of eleven dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 26:153–156.Google Scholar
10. Poku, J. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Soil persistence of dinitramine. Weed Sci. 28:650–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Probst, Gerald W., Golab, Thomasz, and Wright, William L. 1975. Dinitroanilines, Chap. 9 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Degradation of Herbicides. Marcel Dekker Inc., NY.Google Scholar
12. Savage, K. E. 1978. Persistence of several dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 26:465–471.Google Scholar
13. Savage, K. E. and Jordan, T. N. 1978. Persistence of three dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by delayed incorporation. Abst. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 83.Google Scholar
14. Savage, K. E. and Jordan, T. N. 1980. Persistence of three dinitroaniline herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 28:105–110.Google Scholar
15. Walker, A. and Bond, W. 1977. Persistence of the herbicide AC 92, 553, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine in soils. Pestic. Sci. 8:359–365.Google Scholar
16. Weed Science Society of America. 1979. Herbicide Handbook. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 479 pp.Google Scholar
17. Zimdahl, R. L. and Gwynn, S. M. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci. 25:247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar