Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:02:06.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contribution of Soil Spray Deposit from Postemergence Herbicide Applications to Control of Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Christopher Hall
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5
Hank D. Bestman
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5
Malcolm D. Devine
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5

Abstract

Foliage-only, soil-only, and foliage plus soil applications of picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid), clopyralid (3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid), chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide}, and metsulfuron {2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid} were used to determine the contribution of soil spray deposit to the control of Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRAR] under greenhouse conditions. Herbicide reaching the soil contributed significantly to the suppression of secondary shoot growth, particularly when pots were watered from above. In subirrigated pots, the herbicides showed activity if they were sprayed on moist soil, but not if they were sprayed on dry soil. These results suggest that it is important to shield the soil during postemergence applications of herbicides in greenhouse experiments in order to avoid overestimating foliar activity.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blair, A. M. 1983. Some problems associated with studying effects of climate on the performance of soil-acting herbicides. Pages 379388 in Aspects of Applied Biology 4, Influence of environmental factors on herbicide performance and crop and weed biology.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Davis, F. S., and Merkle, M. G. 1967. Distribution of picloram in huisache after foliar and soil applications. Weeds 15:245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1979. Distribution of triclopyr and picloram in huisache (Acacia farnesiana). Weed Sci. 27:527531.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1980. Effectiveness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 28:666670.Google Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Calvert, R. 1980. Adsorption – desorption phenomena. Pages 130 in Hance, R. J., ed. Interaction Between Herbicides and the Soil. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Doig, R. I., Carraro, G. A., and McKinley, N. D. 1983. DPX-T6376 – a new broad spectrum cereal herbicide. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Plant Prot., Brighton. Pages 18.Google Scholar
9. Donald, W. W. 1984. Chlorsulfuron effects on shoot growth and root buds of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 32:4250.Google Scholar
10. Grover, R. 1973. Movement of picloram in soil columns. Can. J. Soil Sci. 53:307314.Google Scholar
11. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:10331048.Google Scholar
12. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Response of broad-leaved weeds, and tolerance of cereals, to soil and foliar applications of DPX-4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989993.Google Scholar
14. Pik, A. J., Peake, E., Strosher, M. T., and Hodgson, G. W. 1977. Fate of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25:10541061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Vanden Born, W. H. 1969. Picloram residues and crop production. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49:628629.Google Scholar