Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:40:51.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of Prickly Sida with Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G.A. Buchanan ,
R.H. Crowley  and
R.D. McLaughlin
G.A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL 36830
R.H. Crowley
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL 36830
R.D. McLaughlin
Affiliation:
Chemagro Corp., Raleigh, NC 27609
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields were not reduced when competing with prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.) for 7 weeks or less after cotton emergence and maintained weed-free for the remainder of the season. Cotton yields were not affected when pure prickly sida stands were controlled for 5 to 6 weeks after cotton emergence and then allowed to grow uncontrolled for the remainder of the season. In the more severe weed competition treatments, cotton plant height and main stem diameter were reduced; however, yield of seed cotton was the most sensitive indicator of prickly sida competition. Maturity of cotton, as measured by percent of total yield obtained at first picking, indicated a delay in maturity in 1 of 3 yr in treatments where competing prickly sida was present for 8 weeks or more. In density studies, where prickly sida emerged with cotton and was allowed to compete for the full growing season, 45 prickly sida plants/15 m of row caused reductions in yield of seed cotton in two of five experiments. In another series of three experiments as few as 32 prickly sida plants/15 m of row significantly reduced seed cotton yields in two of the three experiments. Trash content of machine-harvested cotton was increased at densities of 64 and 128 prickly sida plants/15 m of row in one experiment. Staple length and grade of cotton were not affected by any weed density studied. Micronaire measurements of cotton were reduced at prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 weeds/15 m of row during 1972.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 106 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G.A. 1974. Weeds plague cotton growers from the Carolinas to California. Weeds Today 5:6–7.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G.A. 1974. Weed survey – southern states. Res. Report, South. Weed Sci. Soc. Pages 215–249.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buchanan, G.A. and McLaughlin, R.D. 1975. Influence of nitrogen on weed competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 32:324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burnside, O.C. and Wicks, G.A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204–207.Google Scholar
8. Dawson, J.H. 1965. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 13:206–208.Google Scholar
9. Dawson, J.H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.Google Scholar
10. Frans, R.E. 1969. Changing ecology of weeds in cotton fields. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.-Mechanization Conf. Pages 29–30.Google Scholar
11. Hill, L.V. and Santelmann, P.W., 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Sci. 17:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ivy, H.W. and Baker, R.S. 1972. Prickly sida control and competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137–139.Google Scholar
13. Knake, E.L. and Slife, F.W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.Google Scholar
14. Martinez, C.I. and Nieto, J.H. 1968. The critical periods of competition between weeds and spring cotton in the Yaqui Valley of Obregon, Sonora, Mexico. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. of Amer. Page 151.Google Scholar
15. Ramirez, F.A. and Nieto, J.H. 1968. The critical periods of competition between weeds and winter cotton in the irrigated valley of Mochis, Sins, Mexico. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. of Amer. Page 152.Google Scholar
16. Rogers, N.K., Buchanan, G.A., and Johnson, W.C. 1976. Influence of row spacing on weed competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 24:410–413.Google Scholar
17. Weatherspoon, D.M. and Schweizer, E.E. 1969. Competition between kochia and sugar beets. Weed Sci. 17:464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar