Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:20:59.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
National Jointed Goatgrass Research Program, P.O. Box 53, Ten Sleep, WY 82442

Abstract

Our objective was to identify traits in winter wheat important to competitiveness against jointed goatgrass, measured as increased wheat yields and reduced jointed goatgrass seed production. Jointed goatgrass is an important winter annual grass weed that cannot be controlled selectively in winter wheat. Seven cultivars of soft white winter wheat were grown with and without competition from jointed goatgrass over two growing seasons. Measurements of numerous traits of winter wheat and jointed goatgrass were recorded throughout each growing season. The data were analyzed using path analysis with latent variables to determine which traits most enhanced competitiveness. In a drier year, increased rate of height development was important in maintaining wheat yields when wheat was growing in competition with jointed goatgrass. Increased rate of height development also was an important trait in reducing jointed goatgrass seed production. In a wet year compared to a dry year, the number of wheat heads per plant, the rate of water use, and weight gain were positively correlated to maintaining winter wheat yields. Jointed goatgrass seed production in the wet year was reduced overall compared to the dry year, but from the cultivars tested, there were no traits identified that were critical in enhancing this loss of seed production. This study suggests that cultivars with greater height development rates will be more competitive when growing in fields infested with jointed goatgrass.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1988. Official United States Standards for Grain. United States Standards for Wheat. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Grain Inspection Series. 5 p.Google Scholar
Challaiah, O. C. Burnside, Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34: 689693.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. 1981. Competitive plants, communal plants and yield in wheat crops. Pages 223247 in Evans, L. T. and Peacock, W. J., eds. Wheat Science—Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1996. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) effects on yield components of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 44: 114121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 5: 317.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1987. Persistence, germinability, and distribution of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) seed in soil. Weed Sci. 35: 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotray, P. A. and Young, F. L. 1993. Characterization of root and shoot development of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 41: 353361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenster, C. R. and Wicks, G. A. 1976. Jointed Goatgrass. Nebraska University Cooperative Extension Service G 75–210. 2 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36: 479486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, J. and Rowell, J. G. 1975. Breeding implications of the relationship between competitive ability and pure culture yield in self-pollinated grain corps. Euphytica 24: 221228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, L. 1994. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 588 p.Google Scholar
Hatcher, L. and Stepanski, E. J. 1994. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 552 p.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. R. and Aquino, R. C. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529542.Google ScholarPubMed
Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Appl. 3: 8491.Google Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. Pages 389407 in Dirzo, R. and Sarukhan, J., eds. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Google Scholar