Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:36:47.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Propagation from Stem Sections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark U. Magnusson ,
Donald L. Wyse  and
Joseph M. Spitzmueller
Mark U. Magnusson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Joseph M. Spitzmueller
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine whether aerial and subterranean stem sections taken from Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRAR] plants in four stages of development (spring-vegetative, bud, postbloom, and fall-vegetative) could survive and produce infestations the following year. Partially buried aerial stem sections from all stages of development had greater survival 28 days after planting than completely buried aerial stem sections. Few completely buried aerial stem sections survived. Partially or completely buried subterranean stem sections from Canada thistle at the postbloom stage had the highest survival rate. Few partially or completely buried subterranean stem sections from the other three growth stages survived. Surviving stem sections from spring-vegetative, bud, and postbloom stages of Canada thistle produced adventitious roots that overwintered and produced new infestations the following spring. Surviving stem sections from Canada thistle at the fall-vegetative stage did not develop an adequate root system for winter survival.

Keywords

Vegetative reproductionCIRAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 1987 , pp. 637 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bakker, D. 1960. A comparative life history of [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] and (Tussilago farfara L.), the most troublesome weeds in the newly reclaimed poldus of the former Zuider Zee. Pages 205–222 in Harper, J. L., ed. The Biology of Weeds. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
2. Haderlie, L. C. and Hoefer, R. H. 1980. Greenhouse propagation of Canada thistle. Proc. Canada Thistle Symp. Agric. Can., Regina Res. Stn. Pages 30–36.Google Scholar
3. Hamdoun, A. M. 1972. Regenerative capacity of root fragments of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 12:128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hayden, A. 1934. Distribution and reproduction of Canada thistle in Iowa. Am. J. Bot. 21:355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holm, L. G., Pluncknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Pages 217–224 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
6. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1981. Canada thistle root anatomy and root bud dormancy. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:157–160.Google Scholar
7. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Parker, C. 1966. Some experience of testing new herbicides on perennial weeds in pots. Proc. 8th Br. Weed Cont. Conf. 2:546–552.Google Scholar
9. Sagar, G. R. and Rawson, A. M. 1964. The biology of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Proc. 7th Br. Weed Control Conf. 2:553–562.Google Scholar