Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:57:36.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavior of Potassium Azide in the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti  and
G. F. Warren
J. V. Parochetti
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potassium azide (KN3) was shown to have potential use as a soil fumigant based on the evidence that azide killed dormant seeds in laboratory and field experiments. Volatility was an important factor in the dissipation of KN3; an acid environment greatly increased volatility probably due to rapid conversion to HN3, whereas soil type exerted little influence on vapor loss. Increasing the soil moisture decreased volatility due to water solubility of NH3. KN3 was leachable and weakly adsorbed in various soil types and at different pH levels. From experiments using stoppered flasks to exclude volatility, it was concluded that the dissipation of KN3 was a chemical phenomenon accelerated by elevated temperatures. KN3 dissipated rapidly from an acid soil whether autoclaved or non-autoclaved; however, alkaline soils prevented dissipation of KN3. Apparently, KN3 is converted to HN3 before it is decomposed. Diffusion within the soil was restricted and occurred only in an acid soil. Covering the soil with plastic immediately after application reduced volatility and increased the biological activity of KN3.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , September 1970 , pp. 555 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, C. W. J. and Fisher, K. L. 1940. A comparison of the effects of the respiratory inhibitors azide and cyanide on the frequency of the embryonic fish heart. J. Cell. and Comp. Physiol. 16:103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barton, L. V. 1940. Toxicity of ammonia, chlorine, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulphide, and sulphur dioxide gas. I. Seeds. Contrib., Boyce Thompson Inst. 11:357–363.Google Scholar
3. Bradbury, F. R., Campbell, A., Suckling, C. W., Jameson, H. R., and Peacock, F. C. 1957. The nematicidal properties of azide. Ann. Appl. Biol. 45:241–250.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. and Feeny, R. W. 1967. Herbicide interactions of potassium azide with calcium cyanamid. Weed Sci. 15: 163–167.Google Scholar
5. Danielson, L. L. 1965. Herbicidal effects of sodium and potassium azides on mugwort. Weeds 13:96–98.Google Scholar
6. Hill, G. D., Klingman, G. C., and Woltz, W. G. 1953. Chemical weed control in tobacco plant beds. North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 382. 43 p.Google Scholar
7. Keilin, D. 1936. The action of sodium azide on cellular respiration and on some catalytic oxidation reactions. Proc. Royal Soc. 121B:165–173.Google Scholar
8. Parochetti, J. V. and Warren, G. F. 1966. Volatility of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Pieczarka, S. J. and Warren, G. F. 1961. Effect of soil seals on the diffusion and drench patterns of fumigants. Soil Sci. 91:265–271.Google Scholar
10. Pieczarka, S. J. and Warren, G. F. 1961. Confining fumigants in the soil with surface seals. Weeds 9:106–110.Google Scholar
11. Roberson, C. E. and Austin, C. M. 1957. Colorimetric estimation of milligram quantities of inorganic azides. Anal. Chem. 29:854–855.Google Scholar
12. Simons, E. W. 1950. Effect of pH on the biological activity of weak acids and bases. Nature 166:343–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Stark, F. L. Jr. 1948. Investigations of chloropicrin as a soil fumigant. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir No. 278. 61 p.Google Scholar
14. Steinberg, R. A. and Clayton, E. E. 1949. Chemical soil treatment for black root-rot of tobacco in the greenhouse. Phytopathology 39:155–157.Google Scholar
15. Stenlid, G. 1948. The effect of sodium azide on the exudation and oxygen consumption of excised plant roots. Physiol. Plant. 1:185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Stoppani, A. O. M. 1949. Mechanismo de la inhibition de la citocromo oxidasa por la azide. (Mechanism of the inhibition of cytochrome oxidase by azide) Anal. Asoc. Quimica Argentina 37:120–128. From Biol. Abstr. 1950. 24:1680.Google Scholar
17. Todd, F. A. and Clayton, E. E. 1956. Chemical treatments for the control of weeds and diseases in tobacco plant beds. North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 119:3–23.Google Scholar