Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:58:05.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavior and Fate of Metribuzin in Eight Ontario Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. S. Sharom  and
G. R. Stephenson
M. S. Sharom
Affiliation:
Dep. Environmental Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
G. R. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Dep. Environmental Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adsorption, desorption, and mobility of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] in eight Ontario soils were investigated. The distribution coefficients varied from 0.56 for the least adsorptive Fox sandy loam soil to 31.67 for the most highly adsorptive Leamington muck soil. Most of the adsorbed metribuzin was desorbed from the mineral soils after six aqueous extractions, however substantial amounts of the herbicide remained adsorbed on the muck soils after 10 aqueous extractions. The herbicide was relatively mobile in mineral soils but was immobile in the muck soils. Mobility was inversely correlated with the amount of soil organic matter. Bioassay studies indicated that phytotoxicity of metribuzin also decreased with increasing organic matter content of the soil. Persistence of metribuzin was dependent on microbial degradation. In a field study with Guelph loam, the half-life of metribuzin was approximately 3 months.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 153 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Coble, H.D. and Schrader, J.W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Doherty, P.J. and Warren, G.F. 1969. The adsorption of four herbicides by different types of organic matter and a bentonite clay. Weed Res. 9:20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Figuerola, L.F. and Furtick, W.R. 1972. Effect of climatic conditions on phytotoxicity of terbutryn. Weed Sci. 14:6–10.Google Scholar
4. Freeman, J.A. 1972. The effect of Bay 94337 (metribuzin) on six potato varieties. Can. Weed Comm. Res. Rept. West. Sect. p. 162–164.Google Scholar
5. Green, R.E. and Obien, S.R. 1969. Herbicide equilibrium in soils in relation to water content. Weed Sci. 17:514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Grover, R. 1961. Influence of organic matter, texture and available water on the toxicity of simazine in soil. Weed Sci. 14:148–151.Google Scholar
7. Hance, R.E. 1969. Influence of pH, exchangeable cation and the presence of organic matter on the adsorption of some herbicides by montmorillonite. Can J. Soil Sci. 49:357–364.Google Scholar
8. Harris, C.I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 14:6–10.Google Scholar
9. Helling, C.S. and Turner, B.C. 1968. Pesticide mobility determined by soil thin layer chromatography. Science 162:562–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Phatak, S.C. 1974. Influence of light intensity on metribuzin phytotoxicity to potatoes. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Abstr. p. 121–122.Google Scholar
11. Phatak, S.C. and Stephenson, G.R. 1973. Influence of light and temperature on metribuzin phytotoxicity to tomatoes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:843–847.Google Scholar
12. Smith, A.E. and Wilkinson, R.E. 1974. Uptake and accumulation of metribuzin by several soybean varieties. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Abstr. p. 123.Google Scholar
13. Stephenson, G.R., McLeod, J.M., and Phatak, S.C. 1974. Varietal differences in tolerance of tomatoes to metribuzin. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Abstr. p. 122.Google Scholar
14. Talbert, R.E. and Fletchall, O.H. 1965. The adsorption of s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:46–52.Google Scholar
15. Upchurch, R.P. and Mason, O.D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weed Sci. 10:9–14.Google Scholar
16. Upchurch, R.P. 1966. Behavior of herbicides in soil. Residue Rev. 16:46–85.Google Scholar
17. Weber, J.B., Perry, P.W., and Ibaraki, K. 1968. Effect of pH on the phytotoxicity of prometryne applied to synthetic soil media. Weed Sci. 16:134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Weber, J.B., Weed, S.B., and Ward, T.M. 1969. Adsorption of s-triazines by soil organic matter. Weed Sci. 17:417–421.Google Scholar
19. Weber, J.B., Weed, S.B., and Waldrep, T.W. 1974. Effect of soil constituents on herbicide activity in modified-soil field plot. Weed Sci. 22:454–459.Google Scholar