Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:57:24.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atrazine, S-metolachlor, and isoxaflutole loss in runoff as affected by rainfall and management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan J. Rector ,
David L. Regehr ,
Philip L. Barnes  and
Thomas M. Loughin
Ryan J. Rector
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Philip L. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Thomas M. Loughin
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine the effects of management practices and precipitation on herbicide loss in surface water runoff. A field runoff experiment was conducted in 1999 and 2000 in Manhattan, KS. Some plots received only natural precipitation, whereas others received natural precipitation plus additional precipitation from a rainfall simulator. Atrazine was applied at 0.9 and 1.8 kg ha−1, S-metolachlor at 0.7 and 1.4 kg ha−1, and isoxaflutole at 0.05 and 0.11 kg ha−1 to field corn grown under conventional tillage and no-till. Runoff volumes and herbicide concentrations were determined for each runoff event. Across all precipitation, tillage, and placement variables, atrazine, S-metolachlor, and isoxaflutole and diketonitrile (DKN) (soil metabolite of isoxaflutole), hereafter referred to as isoxaflutole/DKN, losses were similar at 5.0, 4.1, and 4.1% of applied, respectively. Additional precipitation increased runoff 2.5-, 2.2-, and 3.4-fold for atrazine, S-metolachlor, and isoxaflutole/DKN, respectively. Preplant soil incorporation reduced atrazine, S-metolachlor, and isoxaflutole/DKN losses in runoff by 67, 69, and 57%, respectively, compared with soil surface applications. Lower preplant rainfall in 2000 resulted in sharply reduced runoff losses despite postplant precipitation similar to that in 1999. These findings suggest that the best management practices for atrazine can be used to manage S-metolachlor and isoxaflutole/DKN loss in surface water runoff.

Keywords

AtrazineS-metolachlorisoxaflutolediketonitrile metabolite of isoxaflutole (DKN)2-cyano-3-cyclopropyl-1-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylphenyl)propan-1,3-dionecorn, Zea mays L.Rainfall simulatorpreplant incorporatedno-tillwater quality
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 810 - 816
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 20–23, 197–200.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. and Laflen, J. M. 1979. Runoff losses of surface-applied herbicides as affected by wheel tracks and incorporation. J. Environ. Qual 8:602–607.Google Scholar
Basta, N. T., Huhnke, R. L., and Stiegler, J. H. 1997. Atrazine runoff from conservation tillage systems: a simulated rainfall study. J. Soil Water Conserv 52:44–48.Google Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Regehr, D. L., and Barnes, P. L. 2000. Managing to Minimize Atrazine Runoff. Manhattan, KS: Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University MF2208. P. 1.Google Scholar
Franti, T. G., Roeth, F. W., Klein, R. N., Holshouser, D. L., Christiansen, A. P., Schild, J. A., and Zoubek, G. L. 1996. Agricultural Management Practices to Reduce Atrazine in Surface Water. Lincoln, NE: Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln A-20. p. 2.Google Scholar
Gaynor, J. D., MacTavish, D. C., and Fidlay, W. I. 1992. Surface and subsurface transport of atrazine and alachlor from a Brookston clay loam under continuous corn production. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 23:240–245.Google Scholar
Gaynor, J. D., MacTavish, D. C., and Fidlay, W. I. 1995. Organic chemicals in the environment. J. Environ. Qual 24:246–256.Google Scholar
Hershfield, D. N. 1961. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper 40. 115 p.Google Scholar
Hoobler, M. A. 1999. Effects of Atrazine Placement, Application Timing, Application Rate, and Tillage System on Atrazine Runoff Losses. . Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. P. 78.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. A., Truman, C. C., Knisel, W. G., and Davis, F. M. 1992. Pesticide runoff simulations: long-term annual means vs. event extremes. Weed Technol 6:725–730.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. L., Sims, G. K., Wax, L. M., and Hassett, J. J. 2000. Hydrolysis and soil adsorption of the labile herbicide isoxaflutole. Environ. Sci. Technol 34:3186–3190.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Bhowmik, P. C. 2000. Spectroscopic study of the sorption of isoxaflutole and its diketonitrile metabolite in dissimilar soils. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 64:518–525.Google Scholar
Olson, B. L. S., Regehr, D. L., Janssen, K. A., and Barnes, P. L. 1998. Tillage systems effects on atrazine loss in surface water runoff. Weed Technol 12:646–651.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 62:113–124.Google Scholar
Pantone, D. J., Potter, K. N., Torbert, H. A., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1996. Atrazine loss in runoff from no-tillage and chisel-tillage systems on a Houston black clay soil. J. Environ. Qual 25:572–577.Google Scholar
Pantone, D. J., Young, R. A., Buhler, D. D., Eberlein, C. V., Koskinen, W. C., and Forcella, F. 1992. Water quality impacts associated with pre and post emergence application of atrazine in maize. J. Environ. Qual 21:567–573.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L., Devlin, D. L., Barnes, P. L., and Watson, S. L. 1996. Reducing Atrazine Runoff from Crop Fields. Manhattan, KS: Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University MF2208. P. 4.Google Scholar
Rhône-Poulenc Ag Company. 1999. Methods of Analysis for the Quantification of Isoxaflutole and its Metabolites in Water Using Isotopically Labeled Internal Standards—Revision 99.2. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: RPAC File No. 45820.Google Scholar
Sauer, T. J. and Daniel, T. C. 1987. Effect of tillage system on runoff losses of surface-applied pesticides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 51:410–415.Google Scholar
Schwab, A. P., Splichal, P., and Sarong Sonon, L. 1965. Rotating-boom rainfall simulator. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 8:71–72.Google Scholar
Swanson, N. P. 1993. Factors affecting the soil extraction and preconcentration by C18 solid-phase enrichment of alachlor, atrazine, and atrazine dealkylation products. Pp. 86–91 in Hoddinott, K. B. and O'Shay, T. A., eds. Application of Agricultural Analysis in Environmental Studies. Philadelphia, PA: American Society of Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
Tasli, S., Patty, L., Boetti, H., Ravanel, P., Vachaud, G., Scharff, C., Favre-Bonvin, J., Kaouadji, M., and Tissut, M. 1996. Persistence and leaching of atrazine in corn culture in the experimental site of ‘la Côte-St-André (Isère, France). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 30:203–212.Google Scholar
Viviani, F., Little, J. P., and Pallett, K. E. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. II. Characterization of the inhibition of carrot 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by the diketonitrile derivative of isoxaflutole. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 62:125–134.Google Scholar