Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:04:55.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apical Dominance in Rhizomes of Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens): Inhibitory Effect of Scale Leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Mason Robertson ,
John S. Taylor ,
K. Neil Harker ,
Robert N. Pocock  and
Edward C. Yeung
J. Mason Robertson
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, T0C 1S0
John S. Taylor
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, T0C 1S0
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, T0C 1S0
Robert N. Pocock
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, T0C 1S0
Edward C. Yeung
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol. Sci., The Univ. Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surgical experiments were conducted on cultured five-node apical rhizome segments of quackgrass. Removal of scale leaves promoted an initial burst of growth within the axillary buds but did not support the continued growth of buds as effectively as removal of the rhizome apex. Replacement of detached scale leaves over denuded buds temporarily repressed the promotive effect of scale leaf removal. Aqueous extracts of scale leaf material inhibited apical growth in rhizome segments but did not inhibit bud growth. Anatomical sections revealed that removal of scale leaves promoted development of buds: cells enlarged, vascular tissues differentiated, and new nodes began to form within 4 days of the removal of scale leaves. It is suggested that scale leaves contribute to apical dominance by inhibiting the initial development of axillary buds.

Keywords

Quackgrass(Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski) ♯3 AGRREAxillary bud dormancy[Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]AGRRE
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , September 1989 , pp. 680 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burg, S. P. and Burg, E. A. 1968. Ethylene formation in pea seedlings; its relation to the inhibition of bud activity caused by indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Physiol. 43:1069–1074.Google Scholar
2. Caseley, J. 1972. The use of plant growth regulators in the control of Agropyron repens . Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 736–743.Google Scholar
3. Chancellor, R. J. 1974. The development of dominance amongst shoots arising from fragments of Agropyron repens rhizomes. Weed Res. 14: 29–38.Google Scholar
4. Chancellor, R. J. and Leakey, R.R.B. 1972. The effect of plant growth regulators on dominance in Agropyron repens L. Beauv. rhizomes. Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 778–783.Google Scholar
5. Claus, J.S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149–152.Google Scholar
6. Dekker, J. H. and Chandler, K. 1985. Herbicide effect on the viability of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizome buds. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 65: 1057–1064.Google Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Pages 153–168 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Hawaii Univ. Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
8. Hull, J. H. 1970. Germination control of johnsongrass rhizome buds. Weed Sci. 18:118–121.Google Scholar
9. Jensen, W. A. 1962. Pages 55–99 in Botanical Histochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, B. G. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1962. The natural dormancy of vegetative buds on the rhizomes of quackgrass. Weeds 10:53–57.Google Scholar
11. Leakey, R.R.B., Chancellor, R. J., and Vince-Prue, D. 1975. Parental factors in dominance of lateral buds on rhizomes of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Planta 123:267–274.Google Scholar
12. Leakey, R.R.B., Chancellor, R. J., and Vince-Prue, D. 1977. Regeneration from rhizome fragments of Agropyron repens. II. The breaking of late spring dormancy and the influence of chilling and node position on growth from single-node fragments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 87:433–441.Google Scholar
13. McIntyre, G. I. 1964. Mechanism of apical dominance in plants. Nature 203:1190–1191.Google Scholar
14. McIntyre, G. I. 1965. Some effects of the nitrogen supply on the growth and development of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Weed Res. 5:1–12.Google Scholar
15. McIntyre, G. I. 1969. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Evidence of competition for carbohydrate as a factor in the mechanism of inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 47:1189–1197.Google Scholar
16. McIntyre, G. I. 1970. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. 1. The influence of temperature, light intensity, and bud position on the pattern of development. Can. J. Bot. 48:1903–1909.Google Scholar
17. McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 49:99–109.Google Scholar
18. McIntyre, G. I. 1972. Studies on bud development in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. II. The effect of the nitrogen supply. Can. J. Bot. 50: 393–401.Google Scholar
19. McIntyre, G. I. 1976. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens: the influence of water stress on bud activity. Can. J. Bot. 54: 2747–2754.Google Scholar
20. McIntyre, G. I. 1981. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens: the influence of humidity and light on the regenerative growth of isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 59:549–555.Google Scholar
21. McIntyre, G. I. and Damson, E. 1988. Apical dominance in Phaseolus vulgaris. The triggering effect of shoot decapitation and leaf excision on growth of the lateral buds. Physiol. Plant. 74:607–614.Google Scholar
22. McIntyre, G. I. and Hsiao, A. I. 1982. Influence of nitrogen and humidity on rhizome bud growth and glyphosate translocation in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 30:655–660.Google Scholar
23. Parker, C. 1976. Effects on the dormancy of plant organs. Pages 165–190 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
24. Phillips, I.D.J. 1975. Apical dominance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 26: 341–367.Google Scholar
25. Rogan, P. G. and Smith, D. L. 1976. Experimental control of bud inhibition in rhizomes of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 78:113–121.Google Scholar
26. SAS®. User's Guide: Statistics. Chapter 14. Version 5 ed. 1985. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
27. Smith, D. L. and Rogan, P. G. 1980. Correlative inhibition in the shoot of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Ann. Bot. 46:285–296.Google Scholar
28. Wareing, P. F. and Phillips, I.D.J. 1983. Abscisic acid and bud dormancy. Pages 301–330 in Addicott, F. T., ed. Abscisic Acid. Praeger Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
29. Yeung, E. C. and Peterson, C. A. 1972. Studies on the rosette plant Hieracium floribundum. 1. Observations related to flowering and axillary bud development. Can. J. Bot. 50:73–78.Google Scholar