Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T08:19:49.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption and Diffusion of Dinitroaniline Herbicides in Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. L. Jacques  and
R. G. Harvey
G. L. Jacques
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. G. Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adsorption of benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-tri-fluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) was studied in 10 Wisconsin soils. Ratios of the quantity of each herbicide adsorbed and quantities remaining in the soil solution at equilibrium (Kd value) on a Piano silt loam (Typic Argiudoll fine-silty, mixed, mesic) remained relatively constant over a range of concentrations. Herbicide adsorption by the soils was related more closely to soil organic matter than to the other soil chemical and physical properties. Diffusion of the herbicides in Piano silt loam was affected by soil water. Diffusion of trifluralin, profluralin and benefin decreased as soil water increased. Diffusion of dinitramine and fluchloralin did not change significantly with change in water content. Diffusion of oryzalin increased at the highest soil water content. None of the herbicides moved more than 10 mm in the soil during a 17-day period. In unsaturated Piano silt loam, relative mobility of the herbicides was trifluralin ≥benefin>profluralin>fluchloralin>dinitramine≥oryzalin. Oryzalin reached highest mobility in water-saturated soil.

Keywords

Organic matterpHclaysandsilt
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , July 1979 , pp. 450 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic carbon. in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of soil analysis (Part 2). Agron. 9:1367–1378. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Childers, V. O. 1967. Trifluralin behavior in soil. I. Toxicity and persistence as related to organic matter. Agron. J. 59:159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bode, L. E., Day, C. L., Gebhardt, M. R., and Goering, C. E. 1973. Mechanism of trifluralin diffusion in silt loam soil. Weed Sci. 21:480–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bode, L. E., Day, C. L., Gebhardt, M. R., and Goering, C. E. 1973. Prediction of trifluralin diffusion coefficients. Weed Sci. 21:485–489.Google Scholar
5. Christiansen, M. N. and Hilton, J. L. 1974. Prevention of trifluralin effect on cotton with soil applied lipids. Crop Sci. 14:489–492.Google Scholar
6. Corbin, F. T., Upchurch, R. P., and Selman, F. L. 1971. Influence of pH on the phytotoxicity of herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 19:233–239.Google Scholar
7. Crank, J. 1956. The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford Univ. Press, London. 347 pp.Google Scholar
8. Ehlers, W., Letey, J., Spencer, W. F., and Farmer, W. J. 1969. Lindane diffusion in soils: I. Theoretical considerations and mechanisms of movement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33:501–504.Google Scholar
9. Eshel, Y. and Prendeville, G. N. 1967. A Simplified method for determining phytotoxicity, leaching, and adsorption of herbicides in soils. Weeds 15:115–118.Google Scholar
10. Farmer, W. J. and Jensen, C. R. 1970. Diffusion and analysis of carbon-14 labeled dieldrin in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Green, R. E. 1974. Pesticide-clay-water interactions. Pages 3–37 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in soil and water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis. Google Scholar
12. Grover, R. 1974. Adsorption and desorption of trifluralin, triallate, and diallate by various adsorbents. Weed Sci. 22:405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Harrison, G. W., Weber, J. B., and Baird, J. V. 1976. Herbicide phytotoxicity as affected by selected properties of North Carolina soils. Weed Sci. 24:120–125.Google Scholar
14. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicities of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.Google Scholar
16. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.Google Scholar
18. Herbicide Handbook. 1974. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 530 pp.Google Scholar
19. Hilton, J. L. and Christiansen, M. N. 1972. Lipid contribution to selective action of trifluralin. Weed Sci. 20:290–293.Google Scholar
20. Hollist, R. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Trifluralin interactions with soil constitutents. Weed Sci. 19:11–16.Google Scholar
21. Jacques, G. L. 1976. Factors influencing the herbicidal activity of dinitroaniline herbicides. (Diss. Abstr. 37:3192B)Google Scholar
22. Lavy, T. L. 1975. Effects of soil pH and moisture on the direct radioassay of herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 23:49–52.Google Scholar
23. McCall, H. G., Bovey, R. W., McCully, M. G., and Merkle, M. G. 1972. Adsorption and desorption of picloram, trifluralin, and paraquat by ionic and nonionic exchange resins. Weed Sci. 20:250–255.Google Scholar
24. Murray, D. S., Santelmann, P. W., and Greer, H. A. L. 1973. Differential phytotoxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Agron. J. 65:34–36.Google Scholar
25. Schrader, J. W. 1972. Performance of several substituted aniline herbicides on cotton, peanuts, and soybeans on several organic matter levels. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:39.Google Scholar
26. Scott, H. D. and Phillips, R. E. 1972. Diffusion of selected herbicides in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36:714–719.Google Scholar
27. Scott, H. D. and Phillips, R. E. 1973. Self-diffusion coefficients of selected herbicides in water and estimates of their transmission factors in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:965–967.Google Scholar
28. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:46–52.Google Scholar
29. Walker, A. and Crawford, D. V. 1970. Diffusion coefficients for two triazine herbicides in six soils. Weed Res. 10:126–132.Google Scholar
30. Weber, J. B. and MOnaco, T. J. 1972. Review of the chemical and physical properties of the substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:31–37.Google Scholar