Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:52:00.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adjuvant enhancement of large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) control with dithiopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven J. Keeley ,
Bruce E. Branham  and
Donald Penner
Steven J. Keeley
Affiliation:
Horticulture Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A greenhouse study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of adjuvants on postemergence large crabgrass control with dithiopyr. Using barriers to isolate foliage or soil, the primary site of dithiopyr uptake was found to be via foliage. Laboratory and greenhouse studies elucidated the factors involved in enhancement of crabgrass control by dithiopyr with nine superior adjuvants. Two adjuvants increased dithiopyr absorption by 3.7 to 4.3% over the herbicide alone. However, none of the adjuvants increased dithiopyr translocation out of the treated leaf. Treatment of a single large crabgrass leaf indicated that enhancement of dithiopyr activity by adjuvants involved an effect on translocation, on spray retention, and on the external movement of the spray solution to the apical meristem, with the relative importance of any 1 factor depending on the particular adjuvant used. Because of the large losses of dithiopyr during absorption/translocation studies, a separate volatilization experiment determined that 70% of the applied dithiopyr volatilized within 24 h at 24 C. Dithiopyr absorption decreased and volatilization increased with each 10 C increase in temperature. Nonrecoverable dithiopyr ranged from 46 to 55% at 5 C to 92 to 95% at 35 C. Volatility losses of this magnitude may mitigate adjuvant enhancement of postemergence grass activity of dithiopyr.

Keywords

dithiopyr-S,S-dimethyl 2-(difluromethyl)-4-(2-methylpropyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarbothioatechlorsulfuron, (2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide)large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSASite of uptakesurfactantsvolatilityDIGSA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 205 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Armbruster, B. L., Molin, W. T., and Bugg, M. W. 1992. Effects of the herbicide dithiopyr on cell division in wheat root tips. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 39: 110–120.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32: 574–583.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D. 1985. Herbicide absorption and translocation and their relationship to plant tolerances and susceptibility. in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume 2: Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
Holly, K. 1964. Herbicide selectivity in relation to formulation and application methods. in Audus, L. J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. New York: Academic Press, pp. 423–464.Google Scholar
Lehnen, L. P. Jr. and Vaughn, K. C. 1991. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopic investigations of the effects of dithiopyr on onion root tips. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 40: 58–67.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1985. The physiological effects of adjuvants on plants. in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume 2: Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 141–158.Google Scholar
Nash, R. G. 1988. Dissipation from soil. in Grover, R., ed. Environmental Chemistry of Herbicides. Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 131–169.Google Scholar
Rahn, P. R., Parrish, S. K., and Bugg, M. W. 1988. Behavior of MON 7200 under simulated rice paddy conditions. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28: 79.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Petroff, L., and Burow, R. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4: 576–580.Google Scholar
Sands, R. and Bachelard, E. P. 1973. Uptake of picloram by eucalypt leaf discs: I. Effect of surfactants and nature of the leaf surfaces. New Phytol. 72: 69–86.Google Scholar
Swietlik, D. 1989. Adjuvants affect the efficacy of glyphosate on selected perennial weeds. HottScience 24: 470–472.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. W. and Glotfelty, D. E. 1988. Evaporation from soils and crops. in Grover, R., ed. Environmental Chemistry of Herbicides. Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 89–129.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. A. 1986. Use of frigate with glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 203.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3: 60–66.Google Scholar
Weed Science Society of America. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. p. 111.Google Scholar