Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:54:19.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity of Imazaquin in Soil Solution as Affected by Incorporated Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Straw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeff D. Wolt ,
G. Neil Rhodes Jr. ,
John G. Graveel ,
Eva M. Glosauer ,
Mohammad K. Amin  and
Patty L. Church
Jeff D. Wolt
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
G. Neil Rhodes Jr.
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
John G. Graveel
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Eva M. Glosauer
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Mohammad K. Amin
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Patty L. Church
Affiliation:
Univ. Tennessee, Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of wheat straw incorporation on imazaquin concentration and biological activity in soil solution was determined as a function of herbicide rate and time of incubation. Etowah silt loam, amended with wheat straw (2 g/kg) or unamended, received imazaquin (0, 31, 62, or 124 μg ai/kg oven-dry soil). Soils incubated at 25 C were subsampled 0, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h after treatment and soil solutions were analyzed for imazaquin, pH, and electrical conductivity. Wheat straw amendment, imazaquin rate, and time of incubation influenced the concentration of imazaquin in the soil solution. Imazaquin concentration in soil solution exhibited gradual linear declines with time. Relative length of sunflower radicles declined with increased imazaquin rate. Regression of relative radicle length on activity of imazaquin anion in soil solution indicated differential response in the presence of wheat straw-amended versus unamended soil.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum L.imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidsunflower, Helianthus anuus L.Adsorptionpersistencebioactivityion activity
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 254 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. American Cyanamid Company. 1986. Spepter herbicide, imazaquin (CL 252,214: Validation of HPLC method M-1631 for the determination of CL 252,214 residues in soil. Agric. Res. Div. Rep. No. C-2720. American Cyanamid Co., Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
2. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
4. Freund, R. J. and Littel, R. C. 1981. SAS for linear models. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 231 pp.Google Scholar
5. Fuqua, M. A., Rhodes, G. N. Jr., Hayes, R. M., and Krueger, W. A. 1988. Effects of tillage on activity of preemergence herbicides in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:59.Google Scholar
6. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, A., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.Google Scholar
7. Hayes, M.H.B. and Himes, F. L. 1986. Nature and properties of humus-mineral complexes. Pages 103–158 in Huang, P. M. and Schnitzer, M., eds. Interactions of Soil Minerals and Natural Organics and Microbes. SSSA Special Publ. No. 17. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
8. Howard, D. D. and Adams, F. 1965. Calcium requirements for penetration of subsoils by primary cotton roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29:558–562.Google Scholar
9. Kavanagh, B. M., Posner, A. M., and Quirk, J. P. 1980. Effect of adsorption of phenoxyacetic acid herbicides on the surface charge of goethite. J. Soil Sci. 31:33–39.Google Scholar
10. Lindsay, W. L. 1979. Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 449 pp.Google Scholar
11. Loux, M. M. and Slife, F. W. 1987. Residual characteristics of imazaquin, AC 263,499, and FMC 57020 in two Illinois soils. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 27:76.Google Scholar
12. Ononye, E. K., Graveel, J. G., and Wolt, J. D. 1987. Direct determination of benzidine in unaltered soil solution by liquid chromatography. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39:524–532.Google Scholar
13. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Fluometuron in soil solutions as an indicator of its efficacy in three soils. Weed Sci. 30:688–691.Google Scholar
14. Sikora, F. J. and Wolt, J. 1986. Effect of cadmium- and zinctreated sludge on yield and cadmium-zinc uptake of corn. J. Environ. Qual. 15:340–345.Google Scholar
15. Sparks, D. L. 1984. Ion activities: An historical and theoretical overview. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:514–518.Google Scholar
16. Watson, J. R., Posner, A. M., and Quirk, J. P. 1973. Adsorption of the herbicide 2,4-D on goethite. J. Soil Sci. 24:503–511.Google Scholar
17. Wolt, J. and Graveel, J. G. 1986. A rapid routine method for obtaining soil solution using vacuum displacement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 50:602–605.Google Scholar