Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:02:32.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA 362622 in cotton, peanut, and selected weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Shawn D. Askew  and
John W. Wilcut
Shawn D. Askew
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-CGA 362622 when foliar applied to cotton, peanut, jimsonweed, and sicklepod. Differential metabolism is the basis for tolerance in cotton and jimsonweed. In addition, cotton absorbs less herbicide compared with the other three species, thus aiding in tolerance. Only jimsonweed translocated appreciable herbicide (25%) out of treated leaves and acropetally to the meristematic tissue where the herbicide was quickly metabolized. No plant species translocated over 2% of applied radioactivity below the treated leaves. Most of the metabolites formed by the four species were more polar than CGA 362622 and averaged 51, 48, 30, and 25% of the radioactivity detected in the treated leaves of cotton, jimsonweed, peanut, and sicklepod, respectively. The half-life of CGA 362622 was estimated to be 0.8, 1.9, 4, and 6 d in treated leaves of cotton, jimsonweed, sicklepod, and peanut, respectively.

Keywords

CGA 362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium saltjimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. DATSTsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOBcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 474’peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’Half-lifesulfonylureathin-layer chromatography
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 293 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adcock, T. E. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Effects of chlorimuron on soybean (Glycine max) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) as influenced by application timing. Weed Sci. 39:139–142.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Poterfield, D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Weed management systems utilizing CGA 362622 in cotton. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 41:57–58.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J., Bridges, D. C., and Grey, T. 2000. CGA 362622 for postemergence weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:26–27.Google Scholar
Camacho, R. F. and Moshier, L. J. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and activity of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and glyphosate in rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 39:354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1997. Physiological basis for nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in five plant species. Weed Sci. 45:22–30.Google Scholar
Dobbels, A. F. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Technol. 7:844–850.Google Scholar
Gillespie, G. R. 1994. Basis for the differential response of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) biotypes to rimsulfuron. Weed Sci. 42:8–12.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508–516.Google Scholar
Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1984. Basis for response differences of two broadleaf weeds to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 32:162–167.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. M. 2000. Management of Roundup Ready crops in rotation crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:4.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. C. Jr., Wells, J. W., Hudetz, M., et al. 2000. CGA-362622 application timing, rates, and weed spectrum in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:240.Google Scholar
Hudetz, M., Foery, W., Wells, J., and Soares, J. E. 2000. CGA 362622, a new low rate Novartis post-emergent herbicide for cotton and sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:163–166.Google Scholar
Lycan, D. W. and Hart, S. E. 1999. Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) and two weed species to thifensulfuron and bentazon combinations. Weed Sci. 47:143–148.Google Scholar
Ma, G., Coble, H. D., Corbin, F. T., and Burton, J. D. 1997. Physiological mechanisms for differential responses of three weed species to prosulfuron. Weed Sci. 45:642–647.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153–155.Google Scholar
Moreland, D. E., Fleischmann, T. J., Corbin, F. T., and McFarland, J. E. 1996. Differential metabolism of the sulfonylurea herbicide prosulfuron (CGA-152005) by plant microsomes. Z. Naturforsch. 51:698–710.Google Scholar
Neighbors, S. and Privalle, L. S. 1990. Metabolism of primisulfuron by barnyardgrass. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:145–153.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41:523–527.Google Scholar
Petersen, P. J. and Swisher, B. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:7–11.Google Scholar
Rawls, E. K., Wells, J. W., Hudetz, M., Jain, R., and Ulloa, M. F. 2000. CGA 362622: a new herbicide for weed control in sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:163.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Eastin, E. F. 1993. Weed control and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to nicosulfuron and bentazon alone and in mixture. Weed Sci. 41:615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252214 in soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.Google Scholar
Troxler, S. T., Wilcut, J. W., Porterfield, D., Askew, S. D., and Smith, W. D. 2001. Weed management in transgenic and non-transgenic Gossypium hirsutum with CGA 362622, pyrithiobac, bromoxynil, and glyphosate. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 41:58.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Askew, S. D., and Porterfield, D. 2000. Weed management in non-transgenic and transgenic cotton with CGA 362622. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:27.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.Google Scholar