Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:53:16.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and Translocation of Buthidazole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lloyd C. Haderlie*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Absorption and translocation of buthidazole [3-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-imidazolidinone] was determined in several plant tissues. Buthidazole caused slight effects on seed germination. Germination of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. ‘Williams’) seeds was inhibited up to 15% and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) was stimulated up to 13%. Buthidazole was absorbed by germinating soybeans, velvetleaf, and corn (Zea mays L.) with rate of absorption increasing when roots were capable of absorption. Buthidazole concentrations of 0.5 μM or greater inhibited growth of soybean in the early second-trifoliolate growth stage when supplied to the roots in nutrient solution. Within 96 h, 29% of the buthidazole available to soybeans was absorbed from nutrient solution and 89% of that absorbed was found in the shoots. The expanded leaves of soybean accumulated the majority of the radioactivity. Radioactivity in roots of soybean approached a steady state condition within 96 h, whereas 14C continued to increase in shoots. Foliar absorption of buthidazole in soybean greatly increased when any one of several surfactants were used. Soybean dry weight reduction nearly doubled by adding surfactants. Over 60% of the 14C-buthidazole applied to soybean leaves was absorbed within 1.5 h, and increased to 73% by 96 h when the nonionic surfactant, AL-411-F3 [Phytobland Spray Oil (83%) plus ATPLUS 300F (17%)] was used compared to only 7% in 96 h without the surfactant. There was little or no movement of buthidazole from the treated leaves. Translocation was typical of apoplastic movement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1968. Germination and Establishment of Weeds for Experimental Purposes. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 236 pp.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Mode of Action of Herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y. 504 pp.Google Scholar
3. Baradari, M. R., Haderlie, L. C., and Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1980. Chlorflurenol effects on absorption and translocation of dicamba in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense . Weed Sci. 28:(In press).Google Scholar
4. Hilton, H. W. and Osgood, R. V. 1977. Status report on herbicides. Pages 4043 in USA, Hawaii. Sugar Plant. Assoc. Exp. Stn. Annu. Rep.Google Scholar
5. MacDiarmid, B. N. 1975. Vel-5026 – a new herbicide for non-selective weed control. Proc. 28th N. Z. Weed Pest Control Conf. 28:154159.Google Scholar
6. Vostral, H. J., Buchholtz, K. P., and Kust, C. A. 1970. Effect of root temperature on absorption and translocation of atrazine in soybeans. Weed Sci. 18:115117.Google Scholar
7. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25:275287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar