Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:47:40.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of light scatter in the residual visual sensitivity of patients with complete cerebral hemispherectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Sheila M. King ,
Paul Azzopardi ,
Alan Cowey ,
John Oxbury  and
Susan Oxbury
Sheila M. King
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
Paul Azzopardi
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
Alan Cowey
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
John Oxbury
Affiliation:
Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
Susan Oxbury
Affiliation:
Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various residual visual capacities have been reported for the phenomenally blind field of hemispherectomized patients, providing evidence for the relative roles of cortical and subcortical pathways in vision. We attempted to characterize these functions by examining the ability of five patients to detect, localize, and discriminate high-contrast flashed, flickering and moving targets. Dependent measures were verbal, manual, and oculomotor responses. As a control for light scatter, intensity thresholds for monocular detection of targets in the hemianopic field were compared with thresholds obtained when using an additional half eyepatch to occlude the blind hemiretina of the tested eye. One unilaterally destriate patient was tested on the same tasks. In photopic conditions, none of the hemispherectomized patients could respond to visual cues in their impaired fields, whereas the destriate patient could detect, discriminate, and point to targets, and appreciate the apparent motion of stimuli across his midline. Under reduced lighting, the threshold luminance required by hemispherectomized patients to detect stimuli presented monocularly was similar to that required for their detection when all visual information was occluded in the blind field, and only available to the visual system indirectly via light scatter. In contrast, the destriate patient's monocular threshold in his blind field was substantially lower than that for stimuli directly occluded in the blind field. As we found no range of stimuli which the hemispherectomized patients could detect or discriminate that was not also associated with discriminable scattered light, we conclude that the subcortical pathways which survive hemispherectomy cannot mediate voluntary behavioural responses to visual information in the hemianopic field.

Keywords

Residual visionSubcortical visual pathwaysCortical visual pathwaysLuminance intensity thresholdsHemianopic field
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C.B.T. (1983). Hemispherectomy—A modification. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 46, 617–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbur, J.L., Ruddock, K.H. & Waterfield, V.A. (1980). Human visual responses in the absence of the geniculo-calcarine projection. Brain 102, 905–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbur, J.L., Forsyth, P.M. & Findlay, J.M. (1988). Human saccadic eye movements in the absence of the geniculocalcarine projection. Brain 111, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbur, J.L., Watson, J.D.G., Frackowiak, R.S.J. & Zeki, S. (1993). Conscious visual perception without VI. Brain 116, 1293–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbur, J.L., Harlow, A.J. & Weiskrantz, L. (1994). Spatial and temporal response properties of residual vision in a case of hemi-anopia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (London) 343, 157–166.Google Scholar
BEARDSWORTH, E.D. & ADAMS, C.B.T. (1988). Modified hemispherectomy for epilepsy: Early results in 10 cases. British Journal of Neurosurgery 2, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, D.B. (1988). Electrophysiological and behavioral experiments on the primate pulvinar. Progress in Brain Research 75, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blythe, I.M., Bromley, J.M., Kennard, C. & Ruddock, K.H. (1986). Visual discrimination of target displacement remains after damage to the striate cortex in humans. Nature 320, 619–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, I.M., Kennard, C. & Ruddock, K.H. (1987). Residual vision in patients with retrogeniculate lesions of the visual pathways. Brain 110, 887–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braddick, O., Atkinson, J., Hood, B., Harkness, W., Jackson, G. & Vargha-Khadem, F. (1992). Possible blindsight in infants lacking one cerebral hemisphere. Nature 360, 461–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campion, J., Latto, R. & Smith, Y.M. (1983). Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex, and near-threshold vision? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 423–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, A. & Stoerig, P. (1991). Reflections on blindsight. In The Neuropsychology of Consciousness, ed. Milner, D. & Rigg, M., pp. 11–37. London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, R.M. & Bender, D.B. (1991). Selectivity for relative motion in the monkey superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 65, 1115–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felleman, D.J. & van Essen, D.C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grantyn, R. (1988). Gaze control through superior colliculus: Structure and function. In Neuroanatomy of the Oculomotor System, ed. Buttner-Ennever, J.A., pp. 273–333. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.Google Scholar
Gross, C.G. (1991). Contributions of striate cortex and the superior colliculus to visual function in area MT, the superior temporal poly-sensory area and inferior temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 29, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Gonzalez, A., Cavada, C. & Reinoso-Suarez, F. (1994). The lateral geniculate nucleus projects to the inferior temporal cortex in the macaque monkey. NeuroReport 5, 2693–2696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, K.-P., Distler, C., Erickson, R.G. & Mader, W. (1988). Physiological and anatomical identification of the nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 69, 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S.M. & Cowey, A. (1992). Defensive responses to looming visual stimuli in monkeys with unilateral striate cortex ablation. Neuropsychologia 30, 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, S.M., Cowey, A. & Azzopardi, P. (1995). The role of light scatter in the residual visual sensitivity of patients with cerebral hemispher-ectomy. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Abstracts 36(4), S673.Google Scholar
King, S.M., Frey, S., Villemure, J.G., Ptito, A. & Azzopardi, P. (1996). Perception of motion-in-depth in patients with partial or complete cerebral hemispherectomy. Behavioral Brain Research (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macmillan, N.A. & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marzi, C.A., Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S. & Lutzemberger, L. (1986). Spatial summation across the vertical meridian in hemianopics: a test of blindsight. Neuropsychologia 24, 749–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohler, C.W. & Wurtz, R.H. (1977). Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 40, 74–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perenin, M.T. & Jeannerod, M. (1978). Visual function within the hemianopic field following early cerebral hemidecortication in man –I. Spatial localisation. Neuropsychologia 16, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perenin, M.T. (1991). Discrimination of motion direction in perimet-rically blind fields. NeuroReport 2, 397–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptito, A., Lassonde, M., Lepore, F. & Ptito, M. (1987). Visual discrimination in hemispherectomized patients. Neuropsychologia 25, 869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptito, A., Lepore, F., Ptito, M. & Lassonde, M. (1991). Target detection and movement discrimination in the blind field of hemispherectomized patients. Brain 114, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddoch, G. (1917). Dissociation of visual perceptions due to occipital injuries, with especial reference to appreciation of movement. Brain 40, 15–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.L. & Petersen, S.E. (1992). The pulvinar and visual salience. Trends in Neuroscience 15, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodman, H.R., Gross, C.G. & Albright, T.D. (1989). Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal. Journal of Neuroscience 9, 2033–2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, H., Tanaka, K., Isono, H., Yasuda, M. & Mikami, A. (1989). Directionally selective response of cells in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque monkey to the movement of equiluminous opponent colour stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 75, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, S.J. & Desimone, R. (1990). Spectral properties of V4 neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 3369–3389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, J.I. (1984). The accessory optic system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 7, 13–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981). Biometry, 2nd edition. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stoerig, P. (1987). Chromaticity and achromaticity. Evidence for a functional differentiation in visual field defects. Brain 110, 869–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoerig, P. & Cowey, A. (1991). Increment threshold spectral sensitivity in blindsight. Brain 114, 1487–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoerig, P. & Cowey, A. (1992). Wavelength discrimination in blind-sight. Brain 115, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M.M. & Creelman, C.D. (1967). Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41, 782–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueki, K. (1966). Hemispherectomy in the human with special reference to the preservation of function. Progress in Brain Research 21B, 285–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L., Harlow, A. & Barbur, J.L. (1991). Factors affecting visual sensitivity in a hemianopic subject. Brain 114, 2269–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, R.H. & Albano, J.E. (1980). Visual-motor function of the primate superior colliculus. Annual Review of Neuroscience 3, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S.M. (1973). Colour coding in rhesus monkey prestriate cortex. Brain Research 53, 422–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S.M. (1974). Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Physiology 236, 549–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1980). The representation of colours in the cerebral cortex. Nature 284, 412–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1983). Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: the reaction of cells in monkey visual cortex to wavelengths and colours. Neuroscience 4, 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar