Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:21:11.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reverse-Hebb plasticity leads to optimization and association in a simulated visual cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Robert E. Soodak
Robert E. Soodak
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller University, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of a variable-phase synaptic modification rule on the experience-dependent development of a simulated visual cortex were investigated. Of interest were the process of optimization of the internal representation with respect to orientation, through which the weakly tuned neurons of visually inexperienced animals attain their tightly tuned adult characteristics, and the process of association by which identical stimuli presented to either eye come to evoke identical cortical representations. In its general form, the synaptic modification rule was Hebbian. However, it was not assumed that positive correlation of presynaptic and postsynaptic activity would lead to an increase in synaptic weight. The relative phase of presynaptic vs. postsynaptic activity that would effect an increase in synaptic weight was a parameter of the modification rule. When this parameter was zero, synaptic modification conformed to the standard Hebbian type. With a value of 180 deg, or the reverse-Hebb condition, negative correlation between presynaptic and postsynaptic activity led to increased synaptic weight. It was found that a synaptic modification rule of the reverse-Hebb type not only optimized the cortical representation, and associated the representations from the two eyes, but was quite stable with respect to retaining the optimized state for long periods of learning.

Keywords

Hebbian plasticityVisual cortexNeural networks
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , May 1991 , pp. 507 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albus, K. & Wolf, W. (1984). Early postnatal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex: a laminar analysis. Journal of Physiology (London) 348, 153–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bienenstock, E.L., Cooper, L.N. & Munro, P.W. (1982). Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interactions in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Mitchell, D.E. (1973). Environmental modification of the visual cortex and the neural basis of learning and memory. Nature (London) 241, 467–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Van, Sluyters R.C. (1974). Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. Further evidence for a sensitive period. Journal of Physiology (London) 237, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Van, Sluyters R.C. (1975). Innate and environmental factors in the development of the kitten's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 248, 663–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Van, Sluyters R.C. & Movshon, J.A. (1976). Synaptic competition in the kitten's visual cortex. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 40, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Van, Sluyters R.C., Peck, C.K. & Hein, A. (1975). Development of cat visual cortex following rotation of one eye. Nature (London) 257, 584–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, C.J., Isley, M.R. & Shinkman, P.C. (1981). Visual experience and development of interocular orientation disparity in visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 46, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, L.N., Liberman, F. & Oja, E. (1979). A theory for the acquisition and loss of neuron specificity in visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics 33, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creutzfeldt, O.D. & Heggelund, P. (1975). Neural plasticity in visual cortex of adult cats after exposure to visual patterns. Science 188, 1025–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crewther, S.G., Crewther, D.P., Peck, C.K. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1980). Visual cortical effects of rearing cats with monocular or binocular cyclotorsion. Journal of Neurophysiology 44, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enroth-Cugell, C. & Robson, J.G. (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 187, 517–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferster, D. & LeVay, S. (1978). The axonal arborizations of lateral geniculate neurons in the striate cortex of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 182, 923–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hirsch, H.V.B. & Spinelli, D.N. (1971). Modification of the distribution of receptive-field orientation in cats by selective visual exposure during development. Experimental Brain Research 12, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interactions, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 160, 106–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1963). Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 26, 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1970). The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. Journal of Physiology (London) 206, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, A.L., Sur, M., Uhlrich, D.J. & Sherman, S.M. (1985). Projection patterns of individual X- and Y-cell axons from the lateral geniculate nucleus to cortical area 17 in the cat. Journal of Neurology 233, 159–189.Google ScholarPubMed
Isley, M.R., Rogers-Ramachandran, D.C. & Shinkman, P.C. (1990). Interocular torsional disparity and visual cortical development in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 64, 1352–1360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, J. & Lynch, G. (1986). Induction of synaptic potentiation in hippocampus by patterned stimulation involves two events. Science 232, 985–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, A.G. (1983). Relationship between preferred orientation and receptive-field position of neurons in cat striate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 220, 476–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsker, R. (1986 a). From basic network principles to neural architecture: emergence of spatial-opponent cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 7508–7512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsker, R. (1986 b). From basic network principles to neural architecture: emergence of orientation-selective cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 8390–8394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsker, R. (1986 c). From basic network principles to neural architecture: emergence of orientation columns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 8779–8783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movshon, J.A. (1976). Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 261, 125–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movshon, J.A. & Lennie, P. (1979). Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurons. Nature (London) 278, 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movshon, J.A.Thompson, I.D. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1978). Receptive- field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 238, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movshon, J.A. & Van, Sluyters R.C. (1981). Visual neural development. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 477–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saul, A.B. & Cynader, M.S. (1987). Adaptation in single visual cortical neurons: dependence on stimulus contrast, spatial frequency, and direction. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28, 197.Google Scholar
Schall, J.D., Vitek, D.J. & Leventhal, A.G. (1986). Retinal constraints on orienation specificity in cat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 6(3), 823–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherk, H. & Stryker, M.P. (1976). Quantitative study of cortical orientation selectivity in visually inexperienced kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 39, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinkman, P.G. & Bruce, C.J. (1977). Binocular differences in cortical receptive fields of kittens after rotationally disparate binocular experience. Science 197, 285–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shou, T. & Leventhal, A.G. (1989). Organized arrangement of orientation-sensitive relay cells in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 9(12), 4287–4302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillito, A.M. (1975 a). The effectiveness of bicuculline as an antagonist of GABA and visually evoked inhibition in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 250, 305–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillito, A.M. (1975 b). The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive-field properties of neurons in the striate cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 250, 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soodak, R.E. (1986). Two-dimensional modeling of visual receptive fields using Gaussian subunits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 9259–9263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soodak, R.E. (1987). The retinal ganglion cell mosaic defines orientation columns in striate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 84, 3936–3940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tusa, R. J., Palmer, L.A. & Rosenquist, A.C. (1978). The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 177, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von, Der Malsburg C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation-sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetic 14, 85–100.Google Scholar
Wässle, H., Boycott, B.H. & Illing, R.B. (1981). Morphology and mosaic of ON- and OFF-beta cells in the cat retina and some functional considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 212, 177–195.Google Scholar