Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:40:23.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reaction time measures of adaptation to chromatic contrast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

N.R.A. PARRY ,
I.J. MURRAY  and
D.J. McKEEFRY
N.R.A. PARRY*
Affiliation:
Vision Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, United Kingdom
I.J. MURRAY
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
D.J. McKEEFRY
Affiliation:
Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, United Kingdom
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: N.R.A. Parry, Vision Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WH, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) were measured to brief temporally blurred (total onset 570 ms) Gaussian isoluminant chromatic patches (s.d. 0.5°) whose chromaticities lay along the cardinal chromatic axes (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° in MBDKL color space). Bipolar adapting stimuli were employed (0° versus 180° or 90° versus 270°). These were larger Gaussian blobs (s.d. 1°), modulating sinusoidally between the two hues at 1 Hz. Throughout, the background was illuminant “C” (x = 0.31, y = 0.316, L = 12.5). In a single run, a series of 64 or 32 stimuli were presented without adaptation, followed by 64 or 32 stimuli each of which was preceded by 3 s of adaptation, either along the same or the orthogonal chromatic axis. Finally, 192 or 128 RTs were recorded to measure the time course of recovery from adaptation. Both adapting and test stimuli were presented at fixed supra-threshold contrasts. The effect of adaptation was seen as a lengthening of the RT, which occurred in the first few seconds of the adaptation period. After cessation of adaptation, there was a similarly rapid shortening of RT, although full recovery took 60–90 s. Adaptation gain functions suggested that the S-(L + M) system was less prone to adaptation than L-M.

Keywords

Reaction timesAdaptationColor opponencyIsoluminance
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 405 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Derrington, A.M., Krauskopf, J. & Lennie, P. (1984). Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. Journal of Physiology 357, 241–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeValois, R.L., Cottaris, N.P., Elfar, S.D., Mahon, L.E. & Wilson, J.A. (2000). Some transformations of color information from lateral geniculate nucleus to striate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97, 4997–5002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeValois, R.L., DeValois, K.K., Switkes, E. & Mahon, L. (1997). Hue scaling of isoluminant and cone specific lights. Vision Research 37, 885–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauskopf, J., Williams, D.R. & Heeley, D.W. (1982). Cardinal directions of color space. Vision Research 22, 1123–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lennie, P., Krauskopf, J. & Sclar, G. (1990). Chromatic mechanisms in the striate cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 649–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeefry, D.J., Parry, N.R.A. & Murray, I.J. (2003). Simple reaction times in color space: The influence of chromaticity, contrast and cone opponency. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science 44, 2267–2276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, I.J., Parry, N.R.A. & McKeefry, D.J. (2002). RTs in color space; effects of equiluminance and adaptation. Perception 31, 70.Google Scholar
Murray, I.J. & Plainis, S. (2003). Contrast coding and magno/parvo segregation revealed in reaction time studies. Vision Research 43, 2707–2709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, M.J. & Pokorny, J. (1977). Wavelength effects on simple reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 22, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plainis, S. & Murray, I.J. (2000). Neurophysiological interpretation of human visual reaction times: Effect of contrast, spatial frequency and luminance. Neuropsychologia 38, 1555–1564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithson, H.E. & Mollon, J.D. (2004). Is the S-opponent chromatic sub-system sluggish? Vision Research 44, 2919–2929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, M.A. & Mollon, J.D. (1991). Changes in color appearance following post-receptoral adaptation. Nature 349, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, M.A. & Mollon, J.D. (1994). The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance. Vision Research 34, 1993–2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, T., Lee, B.L. & Kremers, J. (1996). The time course of adaptation in macaque retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research 36, 913–931CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed