Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:23:05.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimum-variance cone-excitation ratios and the limits of relational color constancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

SÉRGIO M.C. NASCIMENTO ,
VASCO M.N. de ALMEIDA ,
PAULO T. FIADEIRO  and
DAVID H. FOSTER
SÉRGIO M.C. NASCIMENTO
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Gualtar Campus, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
VASCO M.N. de ALMEIDA
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing Unit—Department of Physics, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
PAULO T. FIADEIRO
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing Unit—Department of Physics, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
DAVID H. FOSTER
Affiliation:
Visual and Computational Neuroscience Group, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Relational color constancy refers to the constancy of the perceived relations between the colors of surfaces of a scene under changes in the spectral composition of the illuminant. Spatial ratios of cone excitations provide a natural physical basis for this constancy, as, on average, they are almost invariant under illuminant changes for large collections of natural surfaces and illuminants. The aim of the present work was to determine, computationally, for specific surfaces and illuminants, the constancy limits obtained by the application of a minimum-variance principle to cone-excitation ratios and to investigate its validity in predicting observers' surface-color judgments. Cone excitations and their changes due to variations in the color of the illuminant were estimated for colored surfaces in simulated two-dimensional scenes of colored papers and real three-dimensional scenes of solid colored objects. For various test surfaces, scenes, and illuminants, the estimated levels of relational color constancy mediated by cone-excitation ratios varied significantly with the test surface and only with certain desaturated surfaces corresponded to ideal matches. Observers' experimental matches were compared with predictions expressed in CIE 1976 (u′,v′) space and were found to be generally consistent with minimum-variance predictions.

Keywords

Color constancyRelational color constancyCone-excitation ratiosColor vision
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 337 - 340
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arend, L. & Reeves, A. (1986). Simultaneous color constancy. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 3, 1743–1751.Google Scholar
Bäuml, K.H. (1999). Simultaneous color constancy: How surface color perception varies with the illuminant. Vision Research 39, 1531–1550.Google Scholar
Brainard, D.H., Brunt, W.A., & Speigle, J.M. (1997). Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 1. Asymmetric matches. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14, 2091–2110.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, F.W. & Brenner, E. (1995). Simultaneous color constancy revisited—An analysis of viewing strategies. Vision Research 35, 2431–2448.Google Scholar
Craven, B.J. & Foster, D.H. (1992). An operational approach to colour constancy. Vision Research 32, 1359–1366.Google Scholar
de Almeida, V.M.N., Fiadeiro, P.T., Nascimento, S.M.C., & Foster, D.H. (2002). Colour constancy under illuminant changes with 3-D and 2-D views of real scenes. Perception 31, 135–135.Google Scholar
de Almeida, V.M.N., Fiadeiro, P.T., & Nascimento, S.M.C. (2004). Colour constancy by asymmetric colour matching with real objects in three-dimensional scenes. Visual Neuroscience 21, 341–345.Google Scholar
Foster, D.H. (2003). Does colour constancy exist? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 439–443.Google Scholar
Foster, D.H. & Nascimento, S.M.C. (1994). Relational colour constancy from invariant cone-excitation ratios. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 257, 115–121.Google Scholar
Foster, D.H., Amano, K., & Nascimento, S.M.C. (2001a). Colour constancy from temporal cues: Better matches with less variability under fast illuminant changes. Vision Research 41, 285–293.Google Scholar
Foster, D.H., Nascimento, S.M.C., Amano, K., Arend, L., Linnell, K.J., Nieves, J.L., Plet, S., & Foster, J.S. (2001b). Parallel detection of violations of color constancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 98, 8151–8156.Google Scholar
Foster, D.H., Amano, K., & Nascimento, S.M.C. (2003). Tritanopic colour constancy under daylight changes? In Normal & Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J.D., Pokorny, J. & Knoblauch, K., pp. 218–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurlbert, A. & Wolf, K. (2003). Color contrast: A contributory mechanism to color constancy. Progress in Brain Research 144, 147–160.Google Scholar
Jaaskelainen, T., Parkkinen, J., & Toyooka, S. (1990). Vector-subspace model for color representation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, 725–730.Google Scholar
Judd, D.B., MacAdam, D.L., & Wyszecki, G. (1964). Spectral distribution of typical daylight as a function of correlated color temperature. Journal of the Optical Society of America 54, 1031–1040.Google Scholar
Munsell Color Corporation (1976). Munsell Book of Color-Matte Finish Collection. Baltimore, Maryland: Munsell Color Corporation.
Nascimento, S.M.C. & Foster, D.H. (1997). Detecting natural changes of cone-excitation ratios in simple and complex coloured images. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 264, 1395–1402.Google Scholar
Nascimento, S.M.C., Ferreira, F.P., & Foster, D.H. (2002). Statistics of spatial cone-excitation ratios in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 19, 1484–1490.Google Scholar
Vos, J.J. (1978). Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer. Color Research and Application 3, 125–128.Google Scholar