Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:16:42.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fused Binocular Vision is Required for Development of Proper Eye Alignment in Barn Owls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Eric I. Knudsen
Eric I. Knudsen
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The eyes of adult barn owls (Tyto alba) are virtually fixed in the head in positions that are highly consistent from one individual to the next. However, early in development the eyes are exodeviated; the eyes achieve their adult positions during the owl's second month of life. Disruption of binocular vision in baby owls leads to permanent, highly abnormal eye positions and interocular alignment. Of three owls raised with both eyelids sutured closed, two developed exotropic strabismus and one developed esotropic strabismus. Two owls reared with monocular vision developed esotropic strabismus, whereas three owls reared with fused, but optically deviated binocular vision developed normal eye positions. Thus, the alignment of the eyes in adults results from an active process that depends on fused binocular vision during early life.

Extracellular microelectrode recordings from the optic tecta of strabismic owls reveal that many units retain binocular inputs from corresponding points of the two eyes: the left-eye and right-eye receptive fields of individual units are misaligned by an amount predicted by the direction and magnitude of the strabismus. These results indicate that an innately determined pattern of connections in the brain anticipates the eye positions necessary to achieve binocular fusion. The hypothesis is put forth that the powerful activation of such binocular neurons by strong, synchronous inputs from the two eyes is the signal required by the optimotor system that proper eye alignment has been attained.

Keywords

StrabismusVisual experienceSensitive periodOptic tectum
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, N. & Murphy, E.H. (1982). The critical period for alteration in cortical binocularity resulting from divergent and convergent strabismus. Developmental Brain Research 2, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, H. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1981). The distribution of neurons projecting from the retina and visual cortex to the thalamus and tectum opticum of the barn owl, Tyto alba, and the burrowing owl, Speotyto cunicularia. Journal of Comparative Neurology 199, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M.L. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1979). A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl. Journal of Comparative Neurology 184, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynader, M.S. (1979). Interocular alignment following visual deprivation in the cat. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 18, 726–741.Google ScholarPubMed
Jampolsky, A. (1978). Unequal visual inputs and strabismus management: a comparison of human and animal strabismus. In Symposium on Strabismus, Trans. New Orleans Acad. Ophthal. Chapter 26, pp. 358–492.Google Scholar
Knudsen, E.I. (1982). Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl. Journal of Neuroscience 2, 1177–1194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, E.I., Esterly, S.D. & Knudsen, P.F. (1984). Monaural occlusion alters sound localization during a sensitive period in the barn owl. Journal of Neuroscience 4, 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, E.I. & Knudsen, P.F. (1985). Vision guides the adjustment of auditory localization in young barn owls. Science 230, 545–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lackner, J.R. (1973). The role of posture in adaptation to visual rearrangement. Neuropsychologia 11, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVay, S., Stryker, M.P. & Shatz, C.J. (1978). Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: a quantitative study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 179, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, J.D. (1979). Binocular visual processing in the owl's telencephalon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 204, 435–454.Google ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, J.D. & Konishi, M. (1976). Effects of monocular deprivation on binocular neurones in the owl's visual Wulst. Nature 264, 753–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakic, P. (1977). Prenatal development of the visual system in rhesus monkey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 278, 245–260.Google ScholarPubMed
Sherman, S.M. (1972). Development of interocular alignment in cats. Developmental Brain Research 37, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinbach, M.J. & Money, K.E. (1973). Eye movements of the owl. Vision Research 13, 889–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiesel, T.N. & Hubel, D.H. (1965). Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 1029–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed