Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:51:23.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eye fixation–related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2010

PIA RÄMÄ  and
THIERRY BACCINO
PIA RÄMÄ*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
THIERRY BACCINO
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Pia Rämä, Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception (CNRS UMR 8158), Université Paris Descartes, 45, rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eye fixation–related potential (EFRP) measures electrical brain activity in response to eye fixations. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the EFRPs vary during consecutive eye fixations while subjects were performing an object identification task. Eye fixations evoked P1 and N1 components at the occipital and parietal recording sites. The latency of P1 component increased during consecutive fixations. The amplitude of P1 increased and the amplitude of N1 decreased during consecutive fixations. The results indicate that EFRPs are modulated during consecutive fixations, suggesting that the current technique may provide a useful tool to study temporal dynamics of visual perception and processes underlying object identification.

Keywords

EEGSaccadic eye-movementsVisual perceptionP1N1
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 27 , Issue 5-6 , November 2010 , pp. 187 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alario, F.X. & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31, 531–552.Google Scholar
Baccino, T. & Manunta, Y. (2005). Eye-fixation-related potentials: Insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology 19, 204–215.Google Scholar
Doniger, G.M., Foxe, J.J., Murray, M.M., Higgins, B.A. & Javitt, D.C. (2002). Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 59, 1011–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doniger, G.M., Foxe, J.J., Murray, M.M., Higgins, B.A., Snodgrass, J.G., Schroeder, C.E. & Javitt, D.C. (2000). Activation timecourse of ventral visual stream object-recognition areas: High density electrical mapping of perceptual closure processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 615–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C. & Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13, 171–180.Google Scholar
Grill-Spector, K. & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science 16, 152–160.Google Scholar
Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: Course-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology 84, 405–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutzler, F., Braun, M., Võ, M.L.H., Engl, V., Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., Leder, H. & Jacobs, A.M. (2007). Welcome to the real world: Validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Research 1172, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, H.H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10, 371–375.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.S. & Olshausen, B.A. (2003). Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. Journal of Vision 3, 499–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazai, K. & Yagi, A. (1999). Integrated effect of stimulation at fixation points on EFRP (eye-fixation related brain potentials). International Journal of Psychophysiology 32, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazai, K. & Yagi, A. (2003). Comparison between the lambda response of eye-fixation-related potentials and the P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 3, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maldonado, P.E. & Babul, C.M. (2007). Neuronal activity in the primary visual cortex of the cat freely viewing natural images. Neuroscience 144, 1536–1543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez, A., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M.I., Frank, L.R., Buxton, R.B., Dubowitz, D.J., Wong, E.C., Hinrichs, H., Heinze, H.J. & Hillyard, S.A. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 2, 364–369.Google Scholar
Marton, M. & Szirtes, J. (1988). Context effects on saccade related brain potentials to words during reading. Neuropsychologia 26, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picton, T.W., Hillyard, S.A. & Galambos, R. (1976). Habituation and attention in the auditory system. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Auditory System: Clinical and Special Topics, ed. Keidel, W.D. & Neff, W.D., pp. 343–390. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, M.C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory 2, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajkai, C., Lakatos, P., Chen, C.M., Pincze, Z., Karmos, G. & Schroeder, C.E. (2008). Transient cortical excitation at the onset of visual fixation. Cerebral Cortex 18, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raney, G.E. & Rayner, K. (1993). Event-related brain potentials, eye movements, and reading. Psychological Science 4, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousselet, G.A., Fabre-Thorpe, M. & Thorpe, S.J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience 5, 629–630.Google Scholar
Sereno, S.C., Brewer, C.C. & O’Donnell, P.J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science 14, 328–333.Google Scholar
Sereno, S.C. & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 489–493.Google Scholar
Sereno, S.C., Rayner, K. & Posner, M.I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport 9, 2195–2200.Google Scholar
Simola, J., Holmqvist, K. & Lindgren, M. (2009). Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: Evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Brain and Language 111, 101–113.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J.G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 6, 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagi, A. (1979). Lambda waves associated with offset of saccades: A subject with large lambda waves. Biological Psychology 8, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagi, A. (1981). Visual signal detection and lambda responses. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 52, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagi, A., Kazai, K. & Takeda, Y. (2000). Spatial and temporal variations in eye-fixation-related potentials. The Japanese Psychological Research 42, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar