Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:05:18.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A correlative study of the physiology and morphology of the retinotectal pathway of the perch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

D. M. Guthrie
Affiliation:
Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester United Kingdom
J. R. Banks
Affiliation:
Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester United Kingdom

Abstract

The anatomy and physiology of the retinotectal pathway of the perch was investigated using physiological and histological techniques. Massed responses of the optic nerve to single shocks exhibited five distinct peaks. Single-unit responses to shocks indicate two groups of fast fibers correlating well with peaks I and II of the massed response. The flash-evoked response in nerve and tectum has three major phases (PSPI-III), with a marked low-threshold fast component. Patterns of flash-evoked response from single fibers vary, but the responses of fast transient fibers coincide with the timing of PSPI, and longer latency groups with PSPII-III. Units reflexly activated by efferents were also seen, and 12% of units were photically inexcitable.

Surprisingly, few fibers responded well to a scanned spot light, unlike tectal cells, and receptive fields were often large (>70 deg). ON/OFF responses, evoked either by whole field or local illumination, were much commoner than pure ON or OFF responses.

Effects of electrical stimulation or cautery of the tectum on the flash-evoked response of fiber bundles, via the efferents were marginal, but repetitive stimulation or section of the optic nerve produced clear-cut deficits in the slow components of the flash-evoked response of the nerve. Stimulation of the eighth nerve produced a complex long-latency, large-amplitude response in the optic nerve.

The fiber spectrum of the optic nerve taken from electron micrographs revealed the presence of a relatively small group (less than 1%) of thick fibers with diameters between 3 μm and 10 μm that could be correlated with fast responses recorded from the optic nerve, and the remainder with axon diameters down to 0.2 μm providing the slow responses. The distribution of cell-body diameters from sectioned and wholemount material indicated a marked distinction between small and large ganglion cells. The total number of fibers in the nerve was estimated 868,840.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlbert, I. (1969). The organization of the cone cells in the retinae of four teleosts–Perca fluvatilis, Lucioperca lucioperca, Acerina cernua, and Coregonus albula. Archiv für Zoologie 22, 445481.Google Scholar
Buser, P. (1955). Descriptions et analyses topographiques des reponses a la stimulation du nerf optique. Journal de Physiologie (Paris) 47, 737768.Google Scholar
Cajal, , Ramon, S. (1893). La retine des vertebres La Cellule 9, 17257.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.H. & Daw, N. (1978). New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology (London) 276, 257276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, D.M. (1982). Methods for the fixation of methylene blue. Tissue and Cell 14(3), 475487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, S.P. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1988). Retinal topography in reef teleosts. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 31, 269295.Google ScholarPubMed
De Kock, J. & Reuter, T. (1978). Retinal ganglion cells in the crucian carp. Journal of Comparative Neurology 179, 535568.Google Scholar
Dunne-Meynell, A. & Sharma, S. (1987). Visual system of the channel catfsh (Ictalurus punctatus). Journal of Comparative Neurology 257, 166175.Google Scholar
Ebbesson, S.O.E. & Meyer, D.L. (1981). Efferents to the retina have multiple sources in teleost fish. Science 214, 924928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famiglietti, E.V., Kaneko, A. & Tachibana, M. (1977). Neuronal architecture of ON and OFF pathways to ganglion cells in carp retina. Science 198, 12671269.Google Scholar
Gasser, H.G. & Erlanger, J. (1927). The role played by the Constituent fibres of a nerve trunk in determining the form of the action potential wave. American Journal of Physiology 80, 522547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D.M. & Banks, J.R. (1978). The receptive-field structure of visual cells in the optic tectum of the freshwater perch (Perca fluviatilis). Brain Research 141, 211225.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D.M. (1981). The properties of the visual pathway of a common freshwater fish (Perca fluviatilis) in relation to its behaviour. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 9, 79111.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D.M. (1990). The physiology of the optic tectum. In Vision in Fishes, ed. Djamgoz, M.B.A. & Douglas, R.A., pp. 72112. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hida, E. & Naka, K-I. (1982). Spatio-temporal visual receptor fields as revealed by spatio-temporal random noise. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 37c, 10481049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, P.F. & Easter, S.S. (1986). Retinal ganglion cells in goldfish. Journal of Neuroscience 6(4), 10371050.Google Scholar
Ito, H. & Murakami, T. (1984). Retinal ganglion cells in two teleost species (Sebasticus marmoratus and Navodon modestus). Journal of Comparative Neurology 229, 8096.Google Scholar
Konishi, J. (1960). Electrical responses of visual centre in fish especially to coloured light flash. Japanese Journal of Physiology 10, 1327.Google ScholarPubMed
Landau, W.M., Clare, M.H. & Bishop, G.H. (1968). Reconstruction of myelinated nerve tract action potentials: an arithmetic method. Experimental Neurology 22, 480490.Google Scholar
Meek, H. (1981). The tectum mesencephali of the goldfish. Ph.D. Thesis, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Naka, K.I. & Carraway, N.R.G. (1975). Morphological and functional identification of catfish retinal neurones. Journal of Neurophysiology 38, 5371.Google Scholar
Polyak, S. (1957). The Vertebrate Visual System. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rager, G. & Rager, U. (1978). Systems matching by degeneration: a quantitative electron-microscope study of retinal ganglion cells in the chick. Experimental Brain Research 33, 6578.Google Scholar
Robinson, R.J., Horsburgh, G.M., Dreher, B. & McCall, M.J. (1987). Changes in the number of retinal ganglion cells and optic nerve axons in the developing albino rabbit. Developmental Brain Research 35, 161174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandeman, D.C. & Rosenthal, N.P. (1974). Efferent axons in fish optic nerve and their effects on retinal ganglion cells. Brain Research 68, 4154.Google Scholar
Schellart, N.A.M. & Spekreijse, H. (1976). Shapes of receptive-field centers in optic tectum of goldfish. Vision Research 16, 10181020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, J.T. (1979). The laminar organization of the optic nerve fibres in the tectum of the goldfish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 205, 287306.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, J. (1983). Parallel Processing. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Tapp, R. (1974). Axon numbers and distribution, myelin thickness, and the reconstruction of the compound action potential in the optic nerve of the teleost Eugerres plumeri. Journal of Comparative Physiology 153, 267274.Google Scholar
Uchiyama, H. & Hironube, H. (1984). Fibre connections and synaptic organization of the preoptic retinopetal nucleus in the file fish (Balistidae) Brain Research 298, 424.Google Scholar
Vanegas, H., Aamt, J. & Essayag-Millan, E. (1973). Electrophysiological evidence for tectal efferents to the fish eye. Brain Research 54, 309313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanegas, H. & Laufer, M. (1974). The optic tectum of a perciform teleost, II: Fine structure. Journal of Comparative Neurology 154, 6170.Google Scholar
Vanegas, H. (1984). The Comparative Neurology of the Optic Tectum. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.W., Bastiani, M.J., Lia, B. & Chalupa, L.M. (1986). Growth cones, dying axons, and developmental fluctuations in the fibre population of the cat's optic nerve. Journal of Comparative Neurology 246, 3269.Google Scholar
Witkovsky, P. (1971). Synapses made by myelinated fibres running to teleost and elasmobranch retinas. Journal of Comparative Neurology 142, 205222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zottoli, S.J., Hordes, A.R. & Faber, D.S. (1987). Localization of optic tectum input to the ventral dendrite of the goldfish Mauthner cell. Brain Research 401, 113121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar