Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:38:19.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convergence of experimental multiple Rayleigh matches to peak L- and M-photopigment sensitivity estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

FRANÇOISE VIÉNOT ,
LUCILE SERREAULT  and
PEDRO PARDO FERNANDEZ
FRANÇOISE VIÉNOT
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CRCDG, Paris, France
LUCILE SERREAULT
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Sud, MST Optique physiologique, Optique de contact et Optométrie, Orsay, France
PEDRO PARDO FERNANDEZ
Affiliation:
Universidad de Extremadura, Departamento de F ísica, Badajoz, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shift in the wavelength of peak sensitivity of the cone photo pigments is a major cause of inter-individual variations in the Rayleigh match. Normal color observers performed multiple Rayleigh matches (i.e., a series of seven Rayleigh-type color matches using various sets of test and primary lights) in order to derive estimates of the M- and L-photo pigment wavelengths of maximum absorbance. We predicted the ratio of incident radiances Pr/Pg for a range of plausible values in terms of wavelength of the peak sensitivity of the M-cone and L-cone. An algorithm allowed us to adjust the values of the peak wavelength of the cone photo pigments in order to minimize the sum of squared differences between predicted and real results of matches. To create candidate M-cone and L-cone photo pigments that best predict the set of equation values, we used the low density spectral absorbance curves of the M-cone and L-cone photo pigments respectively, as tabulated by Stockman and Sharpe (2000), and shifted each template along a logarithmic wavelength scale. For all observers, the system of seven Rayleigh-like equations converges to a unique solution. M- and L-cone photo pigments are estimated separately. The distribution of the wavelength of maximum sensitivity of the photo pigments includes a cluster. Only a few women's results lie outside the cluster. The choice of the template has a considerable influence on the convergence of the algorithm.

Keywords

Multiple Rayleigh color matchesCone photo pigmentsSpectral absorbance templateColorimetryHuman color vision
Type
PHOTOPIGMENTS
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 23 , Issue 3-4 , May 2006 , pp. 419 - 427
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, H.B. (1982). What causes trichromacy? A theoretical analysis using comb-filtered spectra. Vision Research 22, 635–643.Google Scholar
Baylor, D.A., Nunn, B.J., & Schnapf, J.L. (1987). Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Journal of Physiology 390, 145–160.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., McMahon, C., Neitz, M., & Neitz, J. (2000). Flicker-photometric electroretinogram estimates of L:M cone photoreceptor ratio in men with photopigment spectra derived from genetics. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17, 499–509.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.A. (1953). The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. British Medical Bulletin 9, 24–30.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.A., Bowmaker, J.K., & Mollon, J.D. (1983). Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B 220, 115–130.Google Scholar
DeMarco, P., Pokorny, J., & Smith, V.C. (1992). Full spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome linked anomalous trichromats. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
Govardovskii, V.I., Fyhrquist, N., Reuter, T., Kuzmin, D.G., & Donner, K. (2000). In search of the visual pigment template. Visual Neuroscience 17, 509–528.Google Scholar
He, J.C. & Shevell, S.K. (1994). Individual differences in cone photo pigments of normal trichromats measured by dual Rayleigh-type color matches. Vision Research 34, 367–376.Google Scholar
Lamb, T.D. (1995). Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities: common shape in the long-wavelength region. Vision Research 35, 3083–3091.Google Scholar
Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G.H. (1990). Polymorphism in normal human color vision and its mechanisms. Vision Research 30, 621–636.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., & Lutze, M. (1987). Aging of the human lens. Applied Optics 26, 1437–1440.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L.T., Stockman, A., Jägle, H., & Nathans, J. (1999). Opsin genes, cone photo pigments, color vision and colorblindness. In Color Vision: From Genes to Perception, eds. Gegenfurtner, K.R. & Sharpe, L.T., pp. 3–50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sjoberg, S.A., Neitz, M., Balding, S.D., & Neitz, J. (1998). L-cone pigment genes expressed in normal colour vision. Vision Research 38, 3213–3219.Google Scholar
Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J., & Starr, S.J. (1976). Variability of color mixture data—I. Inter-observer variability in the unit coordinates. Vision Research 16, 1087–1094.Google Scholar
Stockman, A. & Sharpe, L.T. (2000). Spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Research 40, 1711–1737. http://www.cvrl.org.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.B.M. & Mollon, J.D. (2004). Modelling the Rayleigh match. Visual Neuroscience 21, 477–482.Google Scholar
Viénot, F. (2001). Retinal distribution of the macular pigment and the cone effective optical density from colour matches of real observers. Color Research and Application 26, S264–S268.Google Scholar