Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:17:08.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amblyopia: The clinician’s view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2018

DAVID HUNTER
DAVID HUNTER*
Affiliation:
Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 35 , 2018 , E011
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel (2012). Preferred practice pattern guidelines: Amblyopia. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology. Available at: www.aao.org/ppp.Google Scholar
American Optometric Association Consensus Panel On Care of the Patient With Amblyopia (2004). Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline: Care of the Patient with Amblyopia. Reference Guide for Clinicians. Available at: http://www.aoa.org/documents/optometrists/CPG-4.pdf (accessed February 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Bregman, J. & Donahue, S.P. (2016). Validation of photoscreening technology in the general pediatrics office: A prospective study. Journal of AAPOS 20, 153–158.Google Scholar
Cotter, S.A., Foster, N.C., Holmes, J.M., Melia, B.M., Wallace, D.K., Repka, M.X., Tamkins, S.M., Kraker, R.T., Beck, R.W., Hoover, D.L., Crouch, E.R. 3rd, Miller, A.M., Morse, C.L. & Suh, D.W. (2012). Writing committee for the pediatric eye disease investigator group. Optical treatment of strabismic and combined strabismic-anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 119, 150–158.Google Scholar
González, E.G., Wong, A.M., Niechwiej-Szwedo, E., Tarita-Nistor, L. & Steinbach, M.J. (2012). Eye position stability in amblyopia and in normal binocular vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 53, 5386–5394.Google Scholar
Grant, S. & Moseley, M.J. (2011). Amblyopia and real-world visuomotor tasks. Strabismus 19, 119–128.Google Scholar
Hendler, K., Mehravaran, S., Lu, X., Brown, S.I., Mondino, B.J. & Coleman, A.L. (2016). Refractive errors and amblyopia in the UCLA preschool vision program; first year results. American Journal of Ophthalmology 172, 80–86. Epub 2016 Sep 14.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.M., Kraker, R.T., Beck, R.W., Birch, E.E., Cotter, S.A., Everett, D.F., Hertle, R.W., Quinn, G.E., Repka, M.X., Scheiman, M.M., Wallace, D.K. & Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2003). A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 110, 2075–2087.Google Scholar
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106–154.Google Scholar
Kelly, K.R., Jost, R.M., De La Cruz, A. & Birch, E.E. (2015). Amblyopic children read more slowly than controls under natural, binocular reading conditions. Journal of AAPOS 19, 515–520.Google Scholar
Kelly, K.R., Jost, R.M., Dao, L., Beauchamp, C.L., Leffler, J.N. & Birch, E.E. (2016). Binocular iPad game vs. patching for treatment of amblyopia in children: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmology 134, 1402–1408.Google Scholar
Kushner, B.J., Lucchese, N.J. & Morton, G.V. (1995). Grating visual acuity with Teller cards compared with Snellen visual acuity in literate patients. Archives of Ophthalmology 113, 485–493.Google Scholar
Membreno, J.H., Brown, M.M., Brown, G.C., Sharma, S. & Beauchamp, G.R. (2002). A cost-utility analysis of therapy for amblyopia. Ophthalmology 109, 2265–2271.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health. Facts about amblyopia. Available at: https://nei.nih.gov/health/amblyopia/amblyopia_guide (accessed January 01, 2017).Google Scholar
Packwood, E.A., Cruz, O.A., Rychwalski, P.J. & Keech, R.V. (1999). The psychosocial effects of amblyopia study. Journal of AAPOS 3, 15–17.Google Scholar
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2002). A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Archives of Ophthalmology 120, 268–278.Google Scholar
Repka, M.X., Beck, R.W., Holmes, J.M., Birch, E.E., Chandler, D.L., Cotter, S.A., Hertle, R.W., Kraker, R.T., Moke, P.S., Quinn, G.E., Scheiman, M.M. & Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2003). A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Archives of Ophthalmology 121, 603–611.Google ScholarPubMed
Sloot, F., Hoeve, H.L., de Kroon, M.L., Goedegebure, A., Carlton, J., Griffiths, H.J., Simonsz, H.J. & EUS€REEN Study Group, (2015). Inventory of current EU paediatric vision and hearing screening programmes. Journal of Medical Screening 22, 55–64.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Lam, D.S., Chen, L.J., Wang, Y., Zheng, C., Lin, Q., Rao, S.K., Fan, D.S., Zhang, M., Leung, P.C. & Ritch, R. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of patching vs. acupuncture for anisometropic amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years. Archives of Ophthalmology 128, 1510–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed