Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T14:31:39.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synaptic input to an ON parasol ganglion cell in the macaque retina: A serial section analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2002

DAVID W. MARSHAK
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston
ELIZABETH S. YAMADA
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston
ANDREA S. BORDT
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Oral Roberts University, Tulsa
WENDY C. PERRYMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Oral Roberts University, Tulsa

Abstract

A labeled ON parasol ganglion cell from a macaque retina was analyzed in serial, ultrathin sections. It received 13% of its input from diffuse bipolar cells. These directed a large proportion of their output to amacrine cells but received a relatively small proportion of their amacrine cell input via feedback synapses. In these respects, they were similar to the DB3 bipolar cells that make synapses onto OFF parasol cells. Bipolar cell axons that contacted the ON parasol cell in stratum 4 of the inner plexiform layer always made synapses onto the dendrite, and therefore, the number of bipolar cell synapses onto these ganglion cells could be estimated reliably by light microscopy in the future. Amacrine cells provided the majority of inputs to the ON parasol cell. Only a few of the presynaptic amacrine cell processes received inputs from the same bipolar cells as the parasol cells, and most of the presynaptic amacrine cell processes did not receive any inputs at all within the series. These findings suggest that most of the inhibitory input to the ON parasol cell originates from other areas of the retina. Amacrine cells presynaptic to the parasol ganglion cell interacted very infrequently with other neurons in the circuit, and therefore, they would be expected to act independently, for the most part.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)