Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:05:42.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The electroretinogram of the rhodopsin knockout mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

KAZUSHIGE TODA
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, and Programs in Neuroscience and in Bioengineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
RONALD A. BUSH
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, and Programs in Neuroscience and in Bioengineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
PETER HUMPHRIES
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Ocular Genetics Unit, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
PAUL A. SIEVING
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, and Programs in Neuroscience and in Bioengineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Abstract

The electroretinogram (ERG) of the rhodopsin knockout (rho−/−) mouse of Humphries et al. (1997) (Humphries et al., 1997) was studied for evidence of light-evoked rod activity and to describe the cone function. The rho−/− retina develops normal numbers of rod and cone nuclei, but the rods have no outer segments, and no rhodopsin is found by immunohistochemistry. The dark-adapted ERG threshold was elevated 4.7 log units above wild-type (WT) control mice, indicating that any residual rod responses were reduced >50,000-fold, consistent with a complete functional knockout. The dark-adapted rho−/− ERG had a cone waveform, and the spectral sensitivity peaked near 510 nm for both dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions, without evidence of a Purkinje shift. The light-adapted ERG b-wave amplitude of young rho−/− mice was the same as WT. The amplitude remained steady up to postnatal day P47, but thereafter it declined to only 1–2% by P80 when no cone outer segments remained. Cone b-wave threshold of dark-adapted rho−/− mice was −1.07 ± 0.39 log cd-s/m2 (n = 17), which is 1.27 log units more sensitive than light-adapted thresholds against a rod-suppressing Ganzfeld background of 1.61 log scotopic cd/m2. This indicates that dark-adapted WT responses to still dimmer stimuli are exclusively rod driven with minimal cone intrusion. Above this cone threshold intensity, the dark-adapted b-wave of WT will be a summation of rod and cone responses. Threshold versus intensity (TVI) studies gave no evidence of a rod influence on the mouse cone b-wave.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)