Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:57:13.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do rods influence the hue of foveal stimuli?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

STEVEN L. BUCK ,
LAURA P. THOMAS ,
NICK HILLYER  and
ERIC M. SAMUELSON
STEVEN L. BUCK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
LAURA P. THOMAS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
NICK HILLYER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
ERIC M. SAMUELSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To understand the generality and mechanisms of previously reported rod hue biases, we examined whether they are present for small foveal stimuli by comparing the wavelengths of the three spectral unique hues under dark-adapted and flash-bleached conditions. Rod green bias (shift of unique yellow) and rod blue bias (shift of unique green) were found for some observers with 1°-diameter foveal stimuli, the size most likely to stimulate rods. Smaller stimuli (0.2° and 0.6° diameter), which were least likely to stimulate rods, produced no large or consistent differences between dark-adapted and bleached conditions. This suggests that rod hue biases result from the local stimulation of rods by light, not from remote suppression by dark-adapted, unstimulated rods, and not from bleaching light artifacts.

Keywords

Human color visionRod-cone interactionFoveal vision
Type
ROD-CONE INTERACTION
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 23 , Issue 3-4 , May 2006 , pp. 519 - 523
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, K.R. & Fishman, G.A. (1985). Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry: Evidence for a distal retinal locus. Documenta Ophthalmologica 60, 3–36.Google Scholar
Buck, S. (1997). Influence of rod signals on hue perception: Evidence from successive scotopic color contrast. Vision Research 37, 1295–1301.Google Scholar
Buck, S. & Knight, R. (2003). Stimulus duration affects rod influence on hue perception. In Normal and Defective Colour Vision, eds. Mollon, J.D., Pokorny & J., Knoblauch, K., pp. 177–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buck, S., Knight, R., & Bechtold, J. (2000). Opponent-color models and the influence of rod signals on the loci of unique hues. Vision Research 40, 3333–3344.Google Scholar
Buck, S., Knight, R., Fowler, G., & Hunt, B. (1998). Rod influence on hue-scaling functions. Vision Research 38, 3259–3263.Google Scholar
Coletta, N.J. & Adams, A.J. (1984). Rod-cone interaction in flicker detection. Vision Research 24, 1333–1340.Google Scholar
DeMarco, P., Pokorny, J., & Smith, V. (1992). Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
De Valois, R.L. & De Valois, K.K. (1993). A multi-stage color model. Vision Research 33, 1053–1065.Google Scholar
Frumkes, T. (unpublished). Dark-adapted rods suppress color opponency. Presentation made at the XIVth Symposium of the International Research Group on Colour Vision Deficiencies. Ghent, 1997.
Goldberg, S.H., Frumkes, T.E., & Nygaard, R.W. (1983). Inhibitory influence of unstimulated rods in the human retina: Evidence provided by examining cone flicker. Science 221, 180–182.Google Scholar
Jameson, D. & Hurvich, L. (1955). Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory. I. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 45, 546–552.Google Scholar
Knight, R. & Buck, S. (2002). Time-dependent changes of rod influence on hue perception. Vision Research 42, 1651–1662.Google Scholar
Lange, G., Denny, N., & Frumkes, T.E. (1997). Suppressive rod-cone interactions: Evidence for separate retinal (temporal) and extraretinal (spatial) mechanisms in achromatic vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 14, 2487–2498.Google Scholar
Lie, I. (1963). Dark adaptation and the photochromatic interval. Documenta Ophthalmologica 17, 411–510.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. & Buck, S. (2004). Generality of Rod Hue Biases with Smaller, Brighter, and Photopically Specified Stimuli. Visual Neuroscience 21, 257–262.Google Scholar
Wyszecki, G. & Stiles, W. (1982). Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.