Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:39:12.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilateral lesions of nucleus subpretectalis/interstitio-pretecto-subpretectalis (SP/IPS) selectively impair figure–ground discrimination in pigeons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2013

ERIN N. SCULLY ,
MARTIN J. ACERBO  and
OLGA F. LAZAREVA
ERIN N. SCULLY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa
MARTIN J. ACERBO*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
OLGA F. LAZAREVA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Earlier, we reported that nucleus rotundus (Rt) together with its inhibitory complex, nucleus subpretectalis/interstitio-pretecto-subpretectalis (SP/IPS), had significantly higher activity in pigeons performing figure–ground discrimination than in the control group that did not perform any visual discriminations. In contrast, color discrimination produced significantly higher activity than control in the Rt but not in the SP/IPS. Finally, shape discrimination produced significantly lower activity than control in both the Rt and the SP/IPS. In this study, we trained pigeons to simultaneously perform three visual discriminations (figure–ground, color, and shape) using the same stimulus displays. When birds learned to perform all three tasks concurrently at high levels of accuracy, we conducted bilateral chemical lesions of the SP/IPS. After a period of recovery, the birds were retrained on the same tasks to evaluate the effect of lesions on maintenance of these discriminations. We found that the lesions of the SP/IPS had no effect on color or shape discrimination and that they significantly impaired figure–ground discrimination. Together with our earlier data, these results suggest that the nucleus Rt and the SP/IPS are the key structures involved in figure–ground discrimination. These results also imply that thalamic processing is critical for figure–ground segregation in avian brain.

Keywords

Shape discriminationColor discriminationFigure–ground discriminationVisual processingSP/IPS
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acerbo, M.J., Lazareva, O.F., McInnerney, J., Leiker, E., Wasserman, E.A. & Poremba, A. (2012). Figure–ground discrimination in the avian brain: The nucleus rotundus and its inhibitory complex. Vision Research 70, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bingman, V.P., Gasser, B. & Colombo, M. (2008). Responses of pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst neurons during acquisition and reversal of a visual discrimination task. Behavioral Neuroscience 122, 1139–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brainard, D.H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10, 433–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdi, F.A. & Whitteridge, D. (1954). The representation of the retina on the optic tectum of the pigeon. Experimental Physiology 39, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellmann, B. & Güntürkün, O. (2001). Structural organization of parallel information processing within the tectofugal visual system of the pigeon. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 429, 94–112.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodos, W. & Bobko, P. (1984). A weighted index of bilateral brain lesions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 12, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodos, W. & Karten, H.J. (1966). Brightness and pattern discrimination deficits in the pigeon after lesions of the nucleus rotundus. Experimental Brain Research 2, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, M., Naito, J., Chen, Y., Ohmori, Y. & Fukuta, K. (2003). Afferent and efferent connections of the nucleus rotundus demonstrated by WGA-HRP in the chick. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia 32, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karten, H.J. & Hodos, W. (1967). A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Pigeon (Columba livia). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Karten, H.J. & Revzin, A.M. (1966). The afferent connections of the nucleus rotundus in the pigeon. Brain Research 2, 368–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mpodozis, J., Cox, K., Shimizu, T., Bischof, H-J., Woodson, W. & Karten, H.J. (1996). GABAergic inputs to the nucleus rotundus (pulvinar inferior) of the pigeon (Columba livia). The Journal of Comparative Neurology 374, 204–222.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguen, A.P., Spetch, M.L., Crowder, N.A., Winship, I.R., Hurd, P.L. & Wylie, D.R.W. (2004). A dissociation of motion and spatial-pattern vision in the avian telencephalon: Implications for the evolution of “visual streams”. The Journal of Neuroscience 24, 4962–4970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, S.E. (1999). Vision Science: From Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shimizu, T., Patton, T.B. & Husband, S.A. (2010). Avian visual behavior and the organization of the telencephalon. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 75, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supér, H. (2012). Neurobiological foundations of figure-ground segregation in primates. In How Animals See the World: Comparative Behavior, Biology, and Evolution of Vision, ed. Lazareva, O.F., Shimizu, T. & Wasserman, E.A., pp. 77–92. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tömböl, T., Németh, A., Sebestény, T. & Alpár, A. (1999). Electron microscopic data on the neurons of nuclei subpretectalis and posterior-ventralis thalami. A combined immunohistochemical study. Anatomy and Embryology 199, 169–183.Google Scholar
Wang, Y.C., Jiang, C. & Frost, B.J. (1993). Visual processing in pigeon nucleus rotundus: Luminance, color, motion, and looming subdivisions. Visual Neuroscience 10, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, M.E., Clark, M.H., Goffus, A. & Hoane, M.R. (2009). Mixed effects modeling of Morris water maze data: Advantages and cautionary notes. Learning and Motivation 40, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H., Friedman, H.S. & Von Der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 20, 6594–6611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed