Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:33:17.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An examination of the variables that affect express saccade generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2004

PETER H. SCHILLER ,
JOHANNES HAUSHOFER  and
GEOFFERY KENDALL
PETER H. SCHILLER
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
JOHANNES HAUSHOFER
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
GEOFFERY KENDALL
Affiliation:
Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The frequency with which express saccades are generated under a variety of conditions in rhesus monkeys was examined. Increasing the gap time between fixation spot termination and target onset increased express saccade frequency but was progressively less effective in doing so as the number of target positions in the sample was increased. Express saccades were rarely produced when two targets were presented simultaneously and the choice of either of which was rewarded; a temporal asynchrony of only 17 ms between the targets reinstated express saccade generation. Express saccades continued to be generated when the vergence or pursuit systems was coactivated with the saccadic system.

Keywords

Eye movementsSaccadesExpress saccadesTarget selectionGap
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 2004 , pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, W. (1989). The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements. Metrics. Reviews of Oculomotor Research 3, 13–67.Google Scholar
Boch, R. & Fischer, B. (1986). Further observations on the occurrence of express-saccades in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 63, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, I.H., Sommer, M.A., & Schiller, P.H. (1999). Express averaging saccades in monkeys. Vision Research 39, 4200–4216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, B. & Boch, R. (1983). Saccadic eye movements after extremely short reaction times in the monkey. Brain Research 260, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, B. & Ramsperger, E. (1984). Human express saccades: Extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Experimental Brain Research 57, 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, B. & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gezeck, S. & Timmer, J. (1998). Detecting multimodality in saccadic reaction time distributions in gap and overlap tasks. Biological Cybernetics 78, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gezeck, S., Fischer, B., & Timmer, J. (1997). Saccadic reaction times: A statistical analysis of multimodal distributions. Vision Research 37, 2119–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalesnykas, R.P. & Hallett, P.E. (1987). The differentiation of visually guided and anticipatory saccades in gap and overlap paradigms. Experimental Brain Research 68, 115–121.Google Scholar
Kowler, E. (1990). The role of visual and cognitive processes in the control of eye movement. Reviews of Oculomotor Research 4, 1–70.Google Scholar
Krauzlis, R.J. (2003). Neuronal activity in the rostral superior colliculus related to the initiation of pusuit and saccadic eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 4333–4344.Google Scholar
McPeek, R.M. & Schiller, P.H. (1994). The effects of visual scene composition on the latency of saccadic eye movements of the rhesus monkey. Vision Research 34, 2293–2305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, F.A., Kawano, K., & Optican, L.M. (1986). Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. Journal of Neurophysiology 56, 1321–1354.Google Scholar
Mokler, A. & Fischer, B. (1999). The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task. Experimental Brain Research 125, 511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paré, M. & Munoz, D.P. (1996). Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: Advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence. Journal of Neurophysiology 76, 3666–3681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashbass, C. (1961). The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements. Journal of Physiology 159, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reulen, J.P. (1984a). Latency of visually evoked saccadic eye movements. I. Saccadic latency and the facilitation model. Biological Cybernetics 50, 251–262.Google Scholar
Reulen, J.P. (1984b). Latency of visually evoked saccadic eye movements. II. Temporal properties of the facilitation mechanism. Biological Cybernetics 50, 263–271.Google Scholar
Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Hughes, H.C., & Fendrich, R. (1991). The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: An analysis of the gap effect. Perception and Psychophysics 49, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, W.H. & Sparks, D.L. (1993). Express saccades: The effects of spatial and temporal uncertainty. Vision Research 33, 2447–2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saslow, M.G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57, 1024–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, P.H. (1998). The neural control of visually guided eye movements. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention: A Developmental Perspective, ed. Richards, J.E., pp. 3–50. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Schiller, P.H. & Chou, I.H. (1998). The effects of frontal eye field and dorsomedial frontal cortex lesions on visually guided eye movements. Nature Neuroscience 1, 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, P.H. & Chou, I. (2000a). The effects of anterior arcuate and dorsomedial frontal cortex lesions on visually guided eye movements in the rhesus monkey: 1. Single and sequential targets. Vision Research 40, 1609–1626.Google Scholar
Schiller, P.H. & Chou, I. (2000b). The effects of anterior arcuate and dorsomedial frontal cortex lesions on visually guided eye movements: 2. Paired and multiple targets. Vision Research 40, 1627–1638.Google Scholar
Schiller, P.H. & Tehovnik, E.J. (2001). Look and see: How the brain moves your eyes about. Progress in Brain Research 134, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, P.H., Sandell, J.H., & Maunsell, J.H. (1987). The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafiq, R., Stuart, G.W., Sandbach, J., Maruff, P., & Currie, J. (1998). The gap effect and express saccades in the auditory modality. Experimental Brain Research 118, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, M.M. & Mays, L.E. (2003). Discharge of saccade-related superior colliculus neurons during saccades accompanied by vergence. Journal of Neurophysiology 90, 1124–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, H. & Fischer, B. (1994). Differential effects of non-target stimuli on the occurrence of express saccades in man. Vision Research 34, 1883–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, H. & Fischer, B. (1995). Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects. Vision Research 35, 987–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar