Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:55:08.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proserpina Unbound: John Ruskin, Maria La Touche, and Victorian Floriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2020

Lindsay Wells
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Filled with caustic statements on artificial plant breeding and florist flowers, John Ruskin's botanical essay collection, Proserpina (1875–86), advances a cogent argument against commercial floriculture and, by extension, the commodification of vegetal life. However, the eco-political stakes of this text have received limited attention. Past studies have primarily interpreted Proserpina as a testament to Ruskin's disquiet about Darwinism and as a memorial to his late love, Rose La Touche. In this article, I argue that beneath these scientific and personal imperatives, Proserpina urges readers to resist the consumption of floral commodities engineered by Victorian nurserymen and florists. My reading draws together the history of nineteenth-century flower breeding with recent inquiries from the field of critical plant studies in order to illuminate how Ruskin's botanical prose dovetails with present-day debates on vegetal ethics. Flower-breeding motifs figure prominently in a series of letters written for Proserpina by Rose's mother, Maria La Touche, whose contributions to this book have long been overlooked. Analyzing Proserpina's floricultural subtext will not only recover La Touche's letters from the shadow of Ruskin's love life but also underscore an unexplored facet of Ruskin's antipathy toward Darwin, who celebrated florist flowers in his own botanical writings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , Winter 2020 , pp. 633 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Albritton, Vicky, and Jonsson, Fredrik Albritton. Green Victorians: The Simple Life in John Ruskin's Lake District. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Alexander, Edward. “Ruskin and Science.” Modern Language Review 64, no. 3 (1969): 508–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Mea. Darwin and His Flowers: The Key to Natural Selection. New York: Taplinger, 1977.Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. Colin Clout's Calendar: The Record of a Summer, April–October. London: Chatto & Windus, 1883.Google Scholar
Arnold, Edward A. “The London Flower Trade.” Nineteenth Century 18, no. 102 (August 1885): 328–37.Google Scholar
Atwood, Sara. “The Soul of the Eye: Ruskin, Darwin, and the Nature of Vision.” Nineteenth-Century Prose 38, no. 1 (2011): 127–46.Google Scholar
Austin, Linda M. “Ruskin and Rose at Play with Words.” Criticism 28, no. 4 (1986): 409–25.Google Scholar
Ball, Patricia M. The Science of Aspects: The Changing Role of Fact in the Work of Coleridge, Ruskin and Hopkins. London: Athlone, 1971.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Romantic Ecology: Wordsworth and the Environmental Tradition. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Dinah. “Ruskin and the Science of Proserpina.” In New Approaches to Ruskin: Thirteen Essays, edited by Hewison, Robert, 142–56. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
Birch, Dinah. Ruskin's Myths. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Burd, Van Akin, ed. Christmas Story: John Ruskin's Venetian Letters of 1876–1877. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Burd, Van Akin. John Ruskin and Rose La Touche: Her Unpublished Diaries of 1861 and 1867. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.Google Scholar
Campbell, Elizabeth. “Flowers of Evil: Proserpina's Venomous Plants in Ruskin's Botany.” Pacific Coast Philology 44, no. 1 (2009): 114–28.Google Scholar
Carter, Tom. The Victorian Garden. Salem: Salem House, 1985.Google Scholar
Chang, Elizabeth Hope. Novel Cultivations: Plants in British Literature of the Global Nineteenth Century. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, William G. Ruskin Relics. New York: T. Y. Crowell, 1904.Google Scholar
Craig, David M. John Ruskin and the Ethics of Consumption. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Crawfurd, O. J. F. “English Flower Gardens.” New Quarterly Magazine 3, no. 40 (1875): 373–98.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray, 1859.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects. London: John Murray, 1862.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 vols. London: John Murray, 1868.Google Scholar
Davis, Alan. “Ruskin and Persephone Revisited: The Goddess, the Maiden, and the Bud.” Ruskin Review and Bulletin 4, no. 2 (2008): 4–19.Google Scholar
Davis, Whitney. Queer Beauty: Sexuality and Aesthetics from Winkelmann to Freud and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, William. “Violas.” Journal of Horticulture, Cottage Gardener, and Home Farmer, 3rd ser., 11, no. 270 (27 August 1885): 177–78.Google Scholar
Dearden, James S. The Library of John Ruskin. Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 2012.Google Scholar
Duthie, Ruth. Florists’ Flowers and Societies. Aylesbury: Shire, 1988.Google Scholar
Duthie, Ruth. “Florists’ Societies and Feasts after 1750.” Garden History 12, no. 1 (1984): 8–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagles, Stuart. After Ruskin: The Social and Political Legacies of a Victorian Prophet, 1870–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Brent. “Flower Shows in Nineteenth-Century England.” Garden History 29, no. 2 (2001): 171–84.Google Scholar
Endersby, Jim. Orchid: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. “Darwin's Use of the Analogy between Artificial and Natural Selection.” Journal of the History of Biology 17, no. 1 (1984): 113–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finley, C. Stephen. “Ruskin, Darwin, and the Crisis of Natural Form.” Cahiers Victoriens & Édouardiens, no. 25 (1987): 7–24.Google Scholar
Fitch, Raymond E. The Poison Sky: Myth and Apocalypse in Ruskin. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Frost, Mark. “‘The Circles of Vitality’: Ruskin, Science, and Dynamic Materiality.” Victorian Literature and Culture 39, no. 2 (2011): 367–83.Google Scholar
Frost, Mark. “Entering the ‘Circles of Vitality’: Beauty, Sympathy, and Fellowship.” In Vital Beauty: Reclaiming Aesthetics in the Tangle of Technology and Nature, edited by Brouwer, Joke, Mulder, Arjen, and Spuybroek, Lars, 132–53. Rotterdam: V2, 2012.Google Scholar
Frost, Mark. “The Everyday Marvels of Rust and Moss: John Ruskin and the Ecology of the Mundane.” Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism 14, no. 1 (2011): 10–22.Google Scholar
Frost, Mark. “Of Trees and Men: The Law of Help in Modern Painters V.” Nineteenth-Century Prose 38, no. 2 (2011): 85–108.Google Scholar
Frost, Mark. “Reading Nature: John Ruskin, Environment, and the Ecological Impulse.” In Victorian Writers and the Environment: Ecocritical Perspectives, edited by Mazzeno, Laurence W. and Morrison, Ronald D., 13–28. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Fuller, Peter. Theoria: Art and the Absence of Grace. London: Chatto & Windus, 1988.Google Scholar
Gagliano, Monica. “Seeing Green: The Re-discovery of Plants and Nature's Wisdom.” In The Green Thread: Dialogues with the Vegetal World, edited by Vieira, Patrícia, Gagliano, Monica, and Ryan, John, 19–35. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Gates, Barbara T. Kindred Nature: Victorian and Edwardian Women Embrace the Living World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gessert, George. Green Light: Toward an Art of Evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girdlestone, T. W. “Rose Garden: Rose John Hopper.” The Garden 36, no. 923 (27 July 1889): 75.Google Scholar
Glenny, George. “On Some of the Points Which Constitute Excellence in the Characters of Florists’ Flowers.” In The Florists’ Guide, and Gardeners’ and Naturalists’ Calendar, edited by Ayres, William P. and Moore, Thomas, 2–4. London: William S. Orr, 1850.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Culture of Flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gray, Asa. “Ruskin's Proserpina.” In Scientific Papers of Asa Gray, 1:199–204. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1889.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Devin. The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature between the Darwins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
H., S. “Plant Collecting.” Floral World and Garden Guide 8, no. 10 (October 1865): 220–23.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew. Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hanley, Keith. “The Discourse of Natural Beauty.” In Ruskin and Environment: The Storm-Cloud of the Nineteenth Century, edited by Wheeler, Michael, 10–37. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Anne. The English Garden and National Identity: The Competing Styles of Garden Design, 1870–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Helsinger, Elizabeth K. Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Heriz-Smith, Shirley. The House of Veitch: A Horticultural Record. London: Royal Horticultural Society, 2002.Google Scholar
Hewison, Robert. John Ruskin: The Argument of the Eye. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hibberd, Shirley. New and Rare Beautiful-Leaved Plants. London: Bell & Daldy, 1870.Google Scholar
Hibberd, Shirley. The Town Garden: A Manual for the Management of City and Suburban Gardens. London: Groombridge, 1855.Google Scholar
Hilton, Tim. John Ruskin: The Later Years. 2 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hull, Howard. “Geographer of the Soul: John Ruskin and His ‘Fairy Books of Science.’” In Ruskin in Perspective: Contemporary Essays, edited by Casaliggi, Carmen and March-Russell, Paul, 215–31. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2007.Google Scholar
Illingworth, John. “Ruskin and Gardening.” Garden History 22, no. 2 (1994): 218–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, David. The Gardens at Brantwood: Evolution of John Ruskin's Lakeland Paradise. London: Pallas Athene, 2014.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. Ruskin's Botanical Books: Re-Ordered and Annotated Editions of Baxter and Sowerby. York: Guild of St. George, 2016.Google Scholar
Ingram, David, and Wildman, Stephen. Ruskin's Flora: The Botanical Drawings of John Ruskin. Lancaster: Ruskin Library and Research Centre, Lancaster University, 2011.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. “Cultivating Our Sensory Perceptions.” In Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives, by Luce Irigaray and Michael Marder, 46–51. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce, and Marder, Michael. Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalba, Laura Anne. Color in the Age of Impressionism: Commerce, Technology, and Art. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Amy M. Bloom: The Botanical Vernacular in the English Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Noel. Hybrid: The History and Science of Plant Breeding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, Frederick. “A Science against Sciences: Ruskin's Floral Mythology.” In Nature and the Victorian Imagination, edited by Knoepflmacher, U. C. and Tennyson, G. B., 246–58. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Kreisel, Deanna K. “‘Form against Force’: Sustainability and Organicism in the Work of John Ruskin.” In Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in the Age of Empire, edited by Hensley, Nathan K. and Steer, Philip, 101–20. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Krieg, Katelin. “Ruskin, Darwin, and Looking beneath Surfaces.” Victorian Literature and Culture 45, no. 4 (2017): 709–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Touche, Maria. Lady Willoughby; or, The Double Marriage. 3 vols. London: Hurst and Blackett, 1855.Google Scholar
La Touche, Maria. The Letters of a Noble Woman (Mrs. La Touche of Harristown). Edited by Young, Margaret Ferrier. London: George Allen, 1908.Google Scholar
Leng, Andrew. “Ruskin's Rewriting of Darwin: Modern Painters 5 and ‘The Origin of Wood.’” Prose Studies 30, no. 1 (2008): 64–90.Google Scholar
Levine, George. “Reflections on Darwin and Darwinizing.” Victorian Studies 51, no. 2 (2009): 223–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, George. “Ruskin, Darwin, and the Matter of Matter.” Nineteenth-Century Prose 35, no. 1 (2008): 223–49.Google Scholar
Louis, Margot K. Persephone Rises, 1860–1927: Mythography, Gender, and the Creation of a New Spirituality. Burlington: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre Shauna. “‘Young Ladies Are Delicate Plants’: Jane Austen and Greenhouse Romanticism.” ELH 77, no. 3 (2010): 689–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDuffie, Allen. Victorian Literature, Energy, and the Ecological Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahood, M. M. The Poet as Botanist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
March, T. C. Flower and Fruit Decoration. London: Harrison, 1862.Google Scholar
Marder, Michael. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Marshall, Nancy Rose. City of Gold and Mud: Painting Victorian London. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jed. “Ruskin, Vivisection, and Scientific Knowledge.” Nineteenth-Century Prose 35, no. 1 (2008): 200–222.Google Scholar
Menely, Tobias, and Taylor, Jesse Oak. “Introduction.” In Anthropocene Reading: Literary History in Geologic Times, 1–24. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Meynell, Alice. John Ruskin. 2nd ed. Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood, 1900.Google Scholar
Mollison, John R. The New Practical Window Gardener. London: Groombridge, 1877.Google Scholar
Nealon, Jeffrey T. Plant Theory: Biopower and Vegetable Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, Francis. “Ruskin, Science, and the Miracles of Life.” Review of English Studies 61, no. 249 (April 2010): 276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gorman, Francis. “Ruskin's Science of the 1870s: Science, Education, and the Nation.” In Ruskin and the Dawn of the Modern, edited by Birch, Dinah, 35–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Owen, C. M. “Scottish Pansies.” The Garden 25, no. 658 (28 June 1884): 529.Google Scholar
Prodger, Phillip. “Ugly Disagreements: Darwin and Ruskin Discuss Sex and Beauty.” In The Art of Evolution: Darwin, Darwinisms, and Visual Culture, edited by Larson, Barbara and Brauer, Fae, 40–58. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press, 2009.Google Scholar
R., A. C. “Tuberous Begonias—Florists’ Flowers.” Journal of Horticulture, Cottage Gardener, and Home Farmer, 3rd ser., 11, no. 264 (16 July 1885): 57.Google Scholar
“Royal Horticultural Society.” Journal of Horticulture, Cottage Gardener, and Home Farmer, n.s., 24, no. 638 (19 June 1873): 486.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Diaries of John Ruskin: 1874–1889. Edited by Evans, Joan and Whitehouse, John Howard. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1956–59.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Letters of John Ruskin to Lord and Lady Mount-Temple. Edited by Bradley, John Lewis. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Private Letters to Lady Mount Temple, Her Husband – & Mrs La Touche from J. R. The Ruskin Foundation, Ruskin Library, Museum and Research Centre, Lancaster University, n.d.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Works of John Ruskin. Edited by Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. 39 vols. London: George Allen, 1903–12.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Paul L. Ruskin's Poetic Argument: The Design of the Major Works. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Seaton, Beverly. “Considering the Lilies: Ruskin's ‘Proserpina’ and Other Victorian Flower Books.” Victorian Studies 28, no. 2 (1985): 255–82.Google Scholar
Sherburne, James Clark. John Ruskin, or the Ambiguities of Abundance: A Study in Social and Economic Criticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, Nicholas. “Politics and Economics.” In The Cambridge Companion to John Ruskin, edited by O'Gorman, Francis, 116–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shteir, Ann B. Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora's Daughters and Botany in England, 1760–1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan. Charles Darwin and Victorian Visual Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Solman, David. Loddiges of Hackney: The Largest Hothouse in the World. London: Hackney Society, 1995.Google Scholar
“A Spring Posy.” Illustrated London News 86, no. 2399 (11 April 1885): 376.Google Scholar
Spuybroek, Lars. The Sympathy of Things: Ruskin and the Ecology of Design. Rotterdam: V2, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stynen, Andreas. “‘Une Mode Charmante’: Nineteenth-Century Indoor Gardening between Nature and Artifice.” Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes 29, no. 3 (2009): 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, Virginia, ed. Sublime and Instructive: Letters from John Ruskin to Louisa, Marchioness of Waterford, Anna Blunden and Ellen Heaton. London: Michael Joseph, 1972.Google Scholar
Syme, Alison. A Touch of Blossom: John Singer Sargent and the Queer Flora of Fin-de-Siècle Art. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Teukolsky, Rachel. The Literate Eye: Victorian Art Writing and Modernist Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Veder, Robin. “Flowers in the Slums: Weavers’ Floristry in the Age of Spitalfields’ Decline.” Journal of Victorian Culture 14, no. 2 (2009): 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, Helen Gill, ed. The Brantwood Diary of John Ruskin. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “Victorian Orchids and the Forms of Ecological Society.” In Strange Science: Investigating the Limits of Knowledge in the Victorian Age, edited by Karpenko, Lara and Claggett, Shalyn, 19–39. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandersee, James H., and Schussler, Elisabeth E.. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” American Biology Teacher 61, no. 2 (February 1999): 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Michael. The Garden in Victorian Literature. Aldershot: Scolar, 1988.Google Scholar
Weltman, Sharon Aronofsky. “Myth and Gender in Ruskin's Science.” In Ruskin and the Dawn of the Modern, edited by Birch, Dinah, 153–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Weltman, Sharon Aronofsky. Performing the Victorian: John Ruskin and Identity in Theater, Science, and Education. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael, ed. Time and Tide: Ruskin and Science. London: Pilkington, 1996.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Anne. The Victorian Gardener: The Growth of Gardening and the Floral World. Stroud: Sutton, 2006.Google Scholar
Willes, Margaret. The Gardens of the British Working Class. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wilmer, Clive. “‘No Such Thing as a Flower [. . .] No Such Thing as a Man’: John Ruskin's Response to Darwin.” In Darwin, Tennyson and Their Readers: Explorations in Victorian Literature and Science, edited by Purton, Valerie, 97–108. New York: Anthem, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B., ed. The Tuberous Begonia, Its History and Cultivation. London: Gardening World Office, 1888.Google Scholar