Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:59:45.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objectively Curious Commitments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2020

Extract

In these times of ours, whither art? What is the use of the defamiliarizing and the sublime amidst cataclysmic conflicts over identity and belonging, resources and institutions, climate and extinction? Understandably, many defenders of art have lately come to frame their defenses in terms of messaging: artists make art to convey messages otherwise excluded from official discourse (ideology, policy, history, social science), to testify and self-express, to achieve recognition and elicit identification. Spectators and readers in turn look to art in order to see themselves mirrored, their experience confirmed, their truth avowed.

Type
Special Cluster: Commitment
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor. “Commitment.” In Aesthetics and Politics, edited by Taylor, Ronald, 177–95. London: Verso, 1977.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. “On Dickens’ The Old Curiosity Shop.” In Notes to Literature, edited by Tiedemann, Rolf, 2:170–77. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Old Curiosity Shop. 1843. New York: Penguin, 2001.Google Scholar
Marshall, Kate. “The Readers of the Future Have Become Shitty Literary Critics.” boundary2online, February 2018, www.boundary2.org/2018/02/kate-marshall-the-readers-of-the-future-have-become-shitty-literary-critics.Google Scholar