Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:59:58.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A LATTER-DAY MYSTERY: THOMAS CARLYLE AND EUGÈNE SUE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Alexander Hugh Jordan
Alexander Hugh Jordan*
Affiliation:
Fondazione Luigi Einaudi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The names Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881) and Eugène Sue (1804–1857) rarely figure in the same sentence. Carlyle is commonly remembered as a dour Scots Calvinist and eminent Victorian; Sue, in contrast, as a sensational French novelist, and sybarite-turned-champagne-socialist. Nevertheless, the following article will contend that Carlyle was in fact familiar with the works of Sue, to such an extent that he adapted passages from the latter's Mystères de Paris (1842–1843) in his own Latter-Day Pamphlets (1850). First, the article will offer a brief sketch of Sue and his novel, before discussing their reception amongst Carlyle's circle of friends and acquaintances. It will then suggest that Carlyle himself was likely to have read the novel, and then proceed to compare the relevant passages of the Mystères and the Pamphlets, which together constitute the primary focus of the article. Finally, it will be argued that this matter is far from being a mere curiosity, of concern only to the most obsessive of Carlyle scholars. To the contrary, it will be suggested that in understanding what Carlyle did with Sue, we will be better able to grasp the meaning of some of the more notorious passages of his most notorious work, and particularly their political thrust. In doing so, the article will build upon a number of recent studies of the reception of French literature in Victorian Britain, and will also reopen the question of Carlyle's debts to French socialism, an issue that continues to be a matter of some controversy amongst Carlyle scholars.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 493 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Altick, Richard D. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900. [1957].New ed. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Juliette. “The London Library and the Circulation of French Fiction in the 1840s.” Information & Culture 48.4 (2013): 391–418.Google Scholar
Baker, William. “The London Library Borrowings of Thomas Carlyle, 1841–1844.” Library Review 30: 2 (1981): 89–95.Google Scholar
Bensimon, Fabrice. Les Britanniques face à la révolution française de 1848. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2000.Google Scholar
Bory, Jean-Louis. Eugène Sue: Dandy mais socialiste. Paris: Hachette, 1973.Google Scholar
Campbell, Ian. Thomas Carlyle. [1974].New ed. Edinburgh: The Saltire Society, 1993.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “Model Prisons.” Latter-Day Pamphlets and Tales by Musaeus, Tieck, Richter. Copyright ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1897. 65–93.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. “The Present Time.” Latter-Day Pamphlets and Tales by Musaeus, Tieck, Richter. Copyright ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1897. 29–64.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas, and Carlyle, Jane Welsh. The Collected Letters of Thomas and Jane Welsh Carlyle. Durham: Duke UP, 1970-.Google Scholar
Chevasco, Berry Palmer. Mysterymania: The Reception of Eugène Sue in Britain, 1838–1860. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2003.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. Citizens and Saints: Politics and Anti-Politics in Early British Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Cofer, David Brooks. Saint-Simonism in the Radicalism of Thomas Carlyle. College Station: English, 1931.Google Scholar
Davis, James A. John Forster: A Literary Life. Leicester: Leicester UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Fielding, Kenneth J. “Carlyle and the Saint-Simonians (1830–1832): New Considerations.” Carlyle and his Contemporaries. Ed. Clubbe, J.. Durham: Duke UP, 1976. 35–59.Google Scholar
Finn, Margot C. After Chartism: Class and Nation in English Radical Politics, 1848–1874. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Forbes Gray, W. “Carlyle and John Forster: an unpublished correspondence.” Quarterly Review 268 (1937): 271–87.Google Scholar
Forster, John. The Life of Charles Dickens. 2 vols. Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott, 1873.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Michael. Carlyle and Dickens. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1972.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Michael. “A Universal ‘howl of execration’: Carlyle's Latter-Day Pamphlets and Their Critical Reception.” Carlyle and his Contemporaries. Ed. Clubbe, J.. Durham: Duke UP, 1976. 129–47.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon, S. “The Carlyles and the Leweses.” Carlyle and His Contemporaries. Ed. Clubbe, J.. Durham: Duke UP, 1976. 181–204.Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian. “George W. M. Reynolds and the radicalization of Victorian serial fiction.” Media History 4.2 (1998): 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecquet, Michèle. Poétique de la parabole: les romans socialistes de George Sand. Paris: Klincksiek, 1992.Google Scholar
Heyrendt, Catherine. “Autour d'un inédit de Carlyle sur la Révolution de 1848.” La France et l'Angleterre au XIXe siècle: Echanges, représentations, comparaisons,. Ed. Aprile, S. and Bensimon, F.. Paris: Editions Créaphis, 2006. 519–40.Google Scholar
Heyrendt, Catherine. “‘My books were not, nor ever will be popular’: Reappraising Carlyle in and through France.” Thomas Carlyle Resartus. Ed. Kerry, P. E. and Hill, M.. Teaneck: Farleigh Dickinson UP, 2010. 170–86.Google Scholar
Howe, Susanne. Geraldine Jewsbury: Her Life and Errors. London: George Allen & Unwin, n.d.).Google Scholar
Humphreys, Anne. “G. W. M. Reynolds: Popular Literature & Popular Politics.” Victorian Periodicals Review 16.3/4 (1983): 79–89.Google Scholar
Jordan, Alexander. “‘Noble Just Industrialism’: Saint-Simonism in the Political Thought of Thomas Carlyle.” Unpublished PhD thesis. European University Institute, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred. “Phallus-Worship (1848): Unpublished Manuscripts III.” Carlyle Newsletter 2 (1980): 19–23.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred. Thomas Carlyle: A Biography. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
LaValley, Albert J. Carlyle and the Idea of the Modern. New Haven: Yale UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Le Quesne, A. L. Carlyle. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Lyon-Caen, Judith. “Un magistère social: Eugène Sue et le pouvoir de représenter.” Le Mouvement social 224 (2008): 75–88.Google Scholar
Marchand, Leslie Alexis. The Athenaeum: A Mirror of Victorian Culture. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1941.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Fredrich, Engels. Rev. of “Latter-Day Pamphlets.” Neue Rheinische Zeitung, politisch-öknomische Revue (4 April 1850): 17–30.Google Scholar
McWilliam, Rohan. “The Mysteries of G. W. M. Reynolds: radicalism and melodrama in Victorian Britain.” Living and Learning: Essays in Honour of J. F. C. Harrison. Ed. Chase, M. and Dyck, I.. Brookfield: Ashgate, 1996. 182–98.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “The Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill 1812–1848: Part II.” The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XIII. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1963.Google Scholar
Morrow, John. Thomas Carlyle. London: Hambledon Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Murphy, Paul Thomas. Toward a Working-Class Canon: Literary Criticism in British Working Class Periodicals, 1816–1858. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Nathan, Michel. “Délinquance et réformisme dans Les Mystères de Paris ,” Paris au XXe siècle: aspects d'un mythe littéraire. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon, 1984. 61–69.Google Scholar
Nowell-Smith, Simon. “Carlyle and the London Library.” English Libraries 1800–1850. London: Lewis, 1958. 59–78.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, Richard K. P. The Saint-Simonians, Mill and Carlyle. London: Lalibela, 1957.Google Scholar
Pietz, Dagmar. Zur literarischen Rezeption des Comte de Saint-Simon: die Rezeption, Verarbeitung und Vermittlung der soziopolitischen Ideen Saint-Simons bei Stendhal und Honoré de Balzac. Bonn: Romantischer Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Christopher. For the People, By the People? Eugène Sue's ‘Les Mystères de Paris’. Oxford: Legenda, 2003.Google Scholar
Proietti, Fausto. Louis Blanc nel dibattito politico inglese (1848–1852). Florence: Centro editoriale toscano, 2009.Google Scholar
Régnier, Philippe. “Les saint-simoniens et George Sand.” Autour de George Sand. Brest: Centre d'études des correspondances des XIXe e XXe siècles, 1992. 55–73.Google Scholar
Reid, Wemyss, ed. The Life, Letters, and Friendships of Richard Monckton Milnes. 2 vols. New York: Cassell, 1891.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Philip. The Seventh Hero: Thomas Carlyle and the Theory of Radical Activism. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jules. “Carlyle's Model Prison and Prisoners Identified.” Victorian Periodicals Newsletter 9.3 (1976): 81–83.Google Scholar
Shine, Hill. Carlyle and the Saint-Simonians: The Concept of Historical Periodicity. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins P, 1941.Google Scholar
Sorensen, David R. “‘A Scotch Proudhon’: Carlyle, Herzen, and the French Revolutions of 1789 and 1848.” The Carlyles at Home and Abroad. Ed. Sorensen, D. R. and Tarr, R. L.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. 40–59.Google Scholar
Sue, Eugène. Les Mystères de Paris. 10 vols. Paris: Paulin, 1845.Google Scholar
Sue, Eugène. The Mysteries of Paris. 3 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1845.Google Scholar
Thiesse, Anne-Marie. “La Chair de l'Utopie ou: la vulgarisation de la pensée saint-simonienne dans les romans d'Eugène Sue.” Regards sur le Saint-Simonisme et les Saint-Simoniens. Ed. Derré, J. R.. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon, 1986. 143–60.Google Scholar
Vanden Bossche, Chris R. Carlyle and the Search for Authority. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Viard, Jacques. “Balzac et le socialisme ‘Pierre Lerouxico-sandique’.” L'Année balzacienne 14 (1993): 285–307.Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin J. Reconstructing the Criminal: Culture, Law, and Policy in England, 1830–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar