Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T15:54:14.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JASPER PACKLEMERTON, VICTORIAN FREAK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2006

Kelly Hager
Kelly Hager
Affiliation:
Simmons College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

ONE OF THEOED'S DEFINITIONS of the word “freak” is that of a freak of nature, “a monstrosity, an abnormally developed individual of any species; a living curiosity exhibited in a show.” The freak of nature I wish to focus on in this essay is marriage, and specifically, marriage as it is “exhibited” in Dickens's novel The Old Curiosity Shop (1840–41). To refer to marriage in a Victorian novel as a freak of nature is perhaps surprising. To refer to the sacred institution as freakish in a Dickens novel may seem to border on heresy. After all, Dickens is the self-appointed novelist of hearth and home, the creator of conservative domestic plots that celebrate marriage as the institution that establishes closure for the novel and for the society it represents. Despite this apparent conservatism and despite our vague sense that most marriages in Dickens are as happy as David and Agnes's, Esther and Allen Woodcourt's, Biddy and Joe's, it is in fact the case that in all his novels, from The Pickwick Papers to Our Mutual Friend, Dickens is fascinated–in a multiplicity of ways both large and small, in a manner that is alternately comic, tragic, melodramatic, ironic–with marriage's discontents. In fact, the disintegration of the institution is one of the things that Dickens makes fictions from, giving the failure of marriage a surprisingly high degree of visibility and presenting the breaking of the matrimonial bond with remarkable clarity and persistence. Dickens novels are full of wives who leave their husbands (Edith Dombey, Lady Dedlock, Louisa Gradgrind), breach of promise suits (in Pickwick and Our Mutual Friend most famously) and characters who try to find legal ways of escaping their marriages (Stephen Blackpool, Betsey Trotwood, Nickleby's Madame Mantalini). This essay, then, is an analysis of how Dickens undermines the institution early in his career, and of how the comic and grotesque display of the body, the sprawling, teeming physical surfaces of The Old Curiosity Shop, both conceal and reveal a story of marital skepticism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 209 - 232
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My thanks to Peter K. Garrett, Deidre Lynch, Thomas J. Otten, Lowry Pei, and Katharine Weber for enormously helpful readings of and conversations about this essay.

References

Altick Richard. 1978. The Shows of London. Cambridge: Belknap, Harvard UP
Baldick Chris. 1987. In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Oxford UP
Bennett Rachel. 1971 “Punch versus Christian in The Old Curiosity Shop.” Review of English Studies 22: 423– 34.Google Scholar
Brodhead Richard. 1993. Cultures of Letters: Scenes of Reading and Writing in Nineteenth-Century America. Chicago: U of Chicago P
Brooks Peter. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: Knopf
Chapman Pauline. 1992. Madame Tussaud in England: London: Quiller,
Chapman Pauline and Anita Leslie. 1978. Madame Tussaud: Waxworker Extraordinary. London: Hutchinson
Costello Dudley. 1854 “History in Wax.” Household Words 9: 17– 20.Google Scholar
Costello Dudley. 1860 “Our Eye-Witness in Great Company.” All the Year Round 2 n. s.: 249– 53.Google Scholar
Dickens Charles. 1983. David Copperfield. Ed. Nina Burgis. Oxford: Oxford UP
Dickens Charles. 1965. Great Expectations. Ed. Angus Calder. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Dickens Charles. 1978. Nicholas Nickleby. Ed. Michael Slater. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Dickens Charles. 1972. The Old Curiosity Shop. Ed. Angus Easson and Malcolm Andrews. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Freedberg David. 1989. The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago: U of Chicago P
Freud Sigmund. 1955. “The ‘Uncanny.’” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Trans. James Strachey. Vol. 17. London: Hogarth, 219– 52.
Hager Kelly. 1996 “Estranging David Copperfield: Reading the Novel of Divorce.” ELH 63: 989– 1019.Google Scholar
Hibbert Christopher, ed. 1985. Queen Victoria in her Letters and Journals. New York: Viking Penguin
Hodgson E. 1790. The Trial at Large of Rhynwick Williams. London: R. Butters
Huet Marie-Hélène. 1993. Monstrous Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard UP
Jameson Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell UP
Landes William-Alan, ed. 1995. Punch and Judy. Studio City: Players Press
Leach Robert. 1985. The Punch and Judy Show: History, Tradition and Meaning. Athens: U of Georgia P
Linton Eliza Lynn. 1856 “Marrriage Gaolers.” Household Words 13: 583– 85.Google Scholar
Mayhew Henry. 1968. London Labour and the London Poor. Vol. 3. New York: Dover 43– 64.
Miller Andrew H. 1995. Novels behind Glass: Commodity Culture and Victorian Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Partridge Eric. 1970. A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English. New York: Macmillan
Phillips Adam. 1993. “On Tickling.” On Kissing, Tickling, and Being Bored: Psychoanalytic Essays on the Unexamined Life. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 9– 11.
Sadoff Dianne. 1982. Monsters of Affection: Dickens, Eliot, and Brontë on Fatherhood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP
Schlicke Paul. 1985. Dickens and Popular Entertainment. London: Allen & Unwin
Schor Hilary. 1999. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Schor Naomi. 1987. “Duane Hanson: Truth in Sculpture.” Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. New York: Methuen, 131– 40.
Stewart Garrett. 1996. Dear Reader: The Conscripted Audience in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP
Stewart Susan. 1984. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP
Watt Ian. 1957. The Rise of the Novel. Berkeley: U of California P
Yeazell Ruth Bernard. 1991. Fictions of Modesty: Women and Courtship in the English Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P
Zemka Sue. 1993 “From the Punchmen to Pugin's Gothics: The Broad Road to a Sentimental Death in The Old Curiosity Shop.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 48: 291– 309.Google Scholar