Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:28:27.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IMMANENT METAPHOR, BRANCHING FORM(S), AND THE UNMAKING OF THE HUMAN IN ALICE AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2015

Rasheed Tazudeen*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Extract

Forms are plastic, names cannot determine the essence of living things, and ceaselessly changing organisms cannot be conceived as elements within a signifying system. Each of these precepts of evolutionary theory finds itself reflected in Lewis Carroll's Alice books: Alice grows bigger and smaller without relation to any notion of a normal or standard size, fantastic organisms such as the “bread-and-butterfly” are generated out of metaphors and puns on taxonomic names, and the Queen's croquet game cannot function properly because the animals do not fulfill their prescribed roles. Lewis Carroll familiarized himself thoroughly with Darwinian theory in the years leading up to his composition of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865) and Through the Looking-Glass (1871). He “read widely on the subject of evolution” (Woolf 191), possessing “nineteen books on Darwin, his theories and his critics” (Smith 8), as well as five works of social evolutionist Herbert Spencer, including First Principles (1862), which put Darwinian theory in dialogue with religious understandings of the world (Cohen 350; Stern 17). As a lecturer in mathematics at Christchurch Oxford from 1855 to 1881, he was present during the famous 1860 debate at Oxford University Museum between Thomas Henry Huxley, one of the main proponents of evolutionary theory in the late nineteenth century, and Bishop of Oxford William Wilberforce, one of its major critics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Attridge, Derek. “Unpacking the Portmanteau, or Who's Afraid of Finnegans Wake?On Puns: The Foundation of Letters. Ed. Culler, Jonathan. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. 140–55.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. London: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. “Alice on the Stage.” Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. London: Penguin, 1998. 293–98.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. The Letters of Lewis Carroll. Ed. Cohen, Morton. 2 vols. New York: Oxford UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morton N. Lewis Carroll: A Biography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
Collingwood, Stuart. The Life and Letters of Lewis Carroll. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1898.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “The Call of the Phoneme: Introduction.” On Puns: The Foundation of Letters. Ed. Culler. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. 116.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. Peterborough: Broadview, 2003.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia, 2004.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Mark Lester. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Empson, William. “The Child as Swain.” Some Versions of Pastoral. New York: New Directions, 1974. 253–94.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, Vol. 17. Ed. Strachey, James. Trans. Joan Rivière. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–56. 143–44.Google Scholar
Huxley, Francis. The Raven and the Writing Desk. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. Vernon, “Return to the Wilberforce-Huxley Debate.” British Journal for the History of Science 21.2 (1988): 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabber.” The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, December 2012. Web. 15 February 2013.Google Scholar
Jub.” The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, December 2012. Web. 15 February 2013.Google Scholar
Juba.” The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, December 2012. Web. 15 February 2013.Google Scholar
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. Philosophy of Nonsense: The Intuitions of Victorian Nonsense Literature. London: Routledge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippit, Akira Mizuta. Electric Animal: Towards a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Minnesota: U of Minnesota P, 2000.Google Scholar
Mock Turtle.” The Oxford English Dictionary. Web. 5 February 2013.Google Scholar
Rackin, Donald. “Blessed Rage: The Alices and the Modern Quest for Order.” Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass: Nonsense, Sense, and Meaning. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1991. 88103.Google Scholar
Sewell, Elizabeth. The Field of Nonsense. London: Chatto and Windus, 1952.Google Scholar
Smith, W. John. “Dodgson's Scientific Interests with Reference to the Books in His Library.” Jabberwocky: The Journal of the Lewis Carroll Society 14.1 (1984/85): 39.Google Scholar
Stern, Jeffrey, ed. Lewis Carroll's Library: A facsimile edition of the catalogue of the auction sale following C. L. Dodgson's death in 1898 (Carroll Studies No. 5). Silver Spring: The Lewis Carroll Society of North America, 1981.Google Scholar
Taylor, Roger, and Wakeling, Edward. Lewis Carroll: Photographer. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, Jeff. “Introduction: Difficulty and Defamiliarisation.” Charles Darwin's Origin of Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Ed. Amigoni, David and Wallace, Jeff. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1995. 146.Google Scholar
Woolf, Jenny. The Mystery of Lewis Carroll. New York: St. Martin's P, 2010.Google Scholar