Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:29:53.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“THE GHOST OF SLAVERY” IN OUR MUTUAL FRIEND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2015

Alexandra Neel
Alexandra Neel*
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On his last trip to America in 1868, Charles Dickens would write a letter to his friend and biographer John Forster, which paints a sobering picture of postbellum Baltimore: “It is remarkable to see how the Ghost of Slavery haunts the town; and how the shambling, untidy, evasive, and postponing Irrepressible proceeds about his free work, going round and round it, instead of at it.” While Dickens's phrase “the Ghost of Slavery” indicts a slave system that persists despite abolition, his representation of the former slave body – “the shambling, untidy, evasive, and postponing Irrepressible” – suggests another kind of ghost, an identity that toggles between the spectral and the grossly embodied. Dickens reinforces this conjunction of the ghostly and the corporeal as he goes on to note that “[t]he melancholy absurdity of giving these people votes, at any rate at present, would glare at one out of every roll of their eyes, chuckle in their mouths, and bump in their heads, if one did not see . . . that their enfranchisement is a mere party trick to get votes” (Letters 27). Resorting to the crudest racial stereotypes, Dickens portrays recently manumitted slaves as dolls devoid of speech and political agency. In depicting the “postponing Irrepressible” as stripped of personhood and civil capacities, Dickens conjures the legal fiction of “civil death” – a medieval English common law that divested a prisoner accused of treason any rights by proclaiming him dead in the eyes of the law. In stark contrast to Dickens's impassioned pleas for the abolition of slavery and prison reform in American Notes (1842), his private remarks in this letter some twenty-five years later convert former slaves into the objects of satire – minstrelsy puppets in a larger political game in which they play no civil part – as it were, dead again. However, even as Dickens attempts to constrain the former slave body through a kind of stereotypical branding, his language – the “postponing Irrepressible” – registers an unease that this corporeal ghost won't die. It is precisely in this form of the living dead that the “ghost of slavery” surfaces in Our Mutual Friend (OMF).

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 511 - 532
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adrian, Arthur A. “Dickens on American Slavery: A Carlylean Slant.” PMLA 67.4 (June 1952): 315–29.Google Scholar
The American Anti-Slavery Almanac for 1837. Vol. 1. No. 2. Boston: Southard, 1837.Google Scholar
BlackstoneWilliam, Sir William, Sir. Commentaries on the Laws of England, in four books. Vol. 4. 12th ed. London: A Strahan and W. Woodfall, 1793–95. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 17 Jan. 2014.Google Scholar
Brown, Bill, ed. Things. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Brown, ed. 1–21.Google Scholar
Chadhuri, Brahma. “Dickens and the Question of Slavery.” Dickens Quarterly 6.1 (March 1989): 3–10.Google Scholar
Claybaugh, Amanda. The Novel of Purpose: Literature and Social Reform in the Anglo-American World. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2007.Google Scholar
[Dallas, E. S.] Rev. of Our Mutual Friend, by Charles Dickens. Times 29 Nov 1865: 6.Google Scholar
Daly, Suzanne. “Kashmir Shawls in Mid-Victorian Novel.” Victorian Literature and Culture 30 (2002): 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, Colin (Joan). The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2011.Google Scholar
Dayan, Colin (Joan). “Poe, Persons, and Property.” American Literary History 11.3 (Autumn 1999): 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Charles. American Notes. Ed. and intro. Patricia Ingham. New York: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “The Black Mill.” All the Year Round. Vols. 5–6. 21 Dec 1861. London: Chapman, 1861.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Letters of Charles Dickens: Volume Twelve, 1868–1870. Ed. Storey, Graham. London: Oxford UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. Ed. and intro. Adrian Poole. New York: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Uncollected Writing from Household Words, 1850–1859. Ed. Stone, Harry. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Dooling, Wayne. Slavery, Emancipation and Colonial Rule in South Africa. Athens: Ohio UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. My Bondage and My Freedom. New York: Miller, Orton & Mulligan, 1855.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. Frederick Douglass: Selected Speeches and Writings. Ed. Foner. Abr., Philip S. and Taylor, adapt. Yuval. Chicago: Lawrence Hill, 1999.Google Scholar
Fabi, Giulia M. “Representing Slavery in Nineteenth-century Britain: The Anxiety of Non/fictional Authorship in Charles Dickens’ American Notes (1842) and William Brown's Clotel (1853).” Images of America: Through the European Looking-Glass. Ed. Chew, William L. III. Brussels: VUB UP, 1997. 125–40.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “The Bio-Economics of Our Mutual Friend.” Subject to History: Ideology, Class, Gender. Ed. Simpson, David. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Revolution of English Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Gallagher, John, and Robinson, Ronald. “The Imperialism of Free Trade.” Economic History Review ns 6.1 (1953): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Michael. “From Bentham to Carlyle: Dickens’ Political Development.” Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (1972): 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, Daniel. “Close Reading at a Distance: The African Americanization of Bleak House.” Critical Inquiry 34.4 (Summer 2008): 729–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar
The Harvard Law Review Association. “Civil Death Statutes. Medieval Fiction in a Modern World.” Harvard Law Review 50.6 (April 1937): 968–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecimovich, Gregg A. “The Cup and the Lip and the Riddle of Our Mutual Friend.” ELH 62.4 (Winter 1995): 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Hutter, Albert D. “Dismemberment and Articulation in Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction 11 (1983): 135–75.Google Scholar
James, Henry. “Our Mutual Friend,” Nation (21 Dec. 1865): 786–87.Google Scholar
L. F., Jr. “The Legal Status of Convicts during and after Incarceration.” Virginia Law Review 37.1 (Jan. 1951): 105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan. “Modern Metamorphoses and Disgraceful Tales.” Brown, ed. 193–226.Google Scholar
Lasser, Carol. “Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric.” Journal of the Early Republic 28 (Spring 2008): 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Julia Sun-Joo. The American Slave Narrative and the Victorian Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes. Intro. Ernest Mandel. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Dispatches for the New York Tribune: Selected Journalism of Karl Marx. Intro. James Ledbetter. New York: Penguin, 2007.Google Scholar
Maskiell, Michelle. “Consuming Kashmir: Shawls and Empires, 1500–2000.” Journal of World History 13.1 (Spring 2002): 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McParland, Robert. Charles Dickens's American Audience. New York: Lexington, 2010.Google Scholar
Moore, Grace. Dickens and Empire: Discourses of Class, Race, and Colonialism in the Works of Charles Dickens. Burlington: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Peterson, Jan. Black Diamond City: Nanaimo, the Victorian Era. Surrey, BC, Can.: Heritage, 2002.Google Scholar
Poole, Adrian, ed and intro. Dickens, Our Mutual Friend.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864. Chicago: U of Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar
Rayner, Mary. “Wine and Slaves: The Failure of an Export Economy and the Ending of Slavery in the Cape Colony, South Africa, 1806–1834.” Diss. Duke U, 1986.Google Scholar
“Roke.” Defs. 1 and 2. The Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd ed. 2010.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Jeffrey T. “The Romance of Caffeine and Aluminum.” Brown, ed. 304–29.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Michael. Ed. Dickens on America & the Americans. Austin: U of Texas P, 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, Caleb. The Prison and the American Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Stone, Harry. “Charles Dickens and Harriet Beecher Stowe.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 12.3 (Dec. 1957): 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Harry. Charles Dickens’ Uncollected Writings from Household Words, 1850–1859. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. Uncle Tom's Cabin; or, Life Among the Lowly. Vol.1. Boston: Jewett, 1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teukolsky, Rachel. “Pictures in Bleak Houses: Slavery and the Aesthetics of Transatlantic Reform.” ELH 76.2 (Summer 2009): 491–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, John O. “Charles Dickens and the American Civil War.” Studies in Philology 57 (1960): 535–48.Google Scholar
Weld, Theodore. American Slavery As It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses. 1839. New York: Arno, 1968.Google Scholar
Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America, 1780–1865. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Xu, Wenying. “The Opium Trade and Little Dorrit: A Case in Reading Silences.” Victorian Literature and Culture 25.1 (1997): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zutshi, Chitralekha. “‘Designed for eternity’: Kashmiri Shawls, Empire, and Cultures of Production and Consumption in Mid-Victorian Britain.” Journal of British Studies 48.2 (April 2009): 420–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar