Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:57:08.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GASKELL'S DETOURS: HOW MARY BARTON, RUTH, AND CRANFORD REDEFINED “REDUNDANCY”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

Anna Fenton-Hathaway
Anna Fenton-Hathaway*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the 1851 census reported an “excess” of some half-million women in Britain, feminists and anti-feminists quickly took to the press to debate the implications of the demographic imbalance. Yet Victorian novelists also wishing to convey and alter the “Condition of England” experienced something of a quandary: How should fiction respond to news of the imbalance, and what options could be suggested for resolving it?

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 235 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Altick, Richard D. Victorian People and Ideas. New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Ed. Jones, Vivien. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Boucherett, Jessie. “How to Provide for Superfluous Women.” Woman's Work and Woman's Culture: A Series of Essays. Ed. Butler, Josephine. London: Macmillan, 1869. Google Books. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Nicola. “Dickens and the Form of the Novel.” The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Ed. Jordan, John O.. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 152–66.Google Scholar
Chapple, J. A. V., and Pollard, Arthur, eds. The Letters of Mrs. Gaskell. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Chorley, Henry Fothergill. Rev. of Cranford. Athenaeum (25 June 1853): 765. Rpt. in Easson, ed. 194–95.Google Scholar
Collins, W. Lucas. “A Few Words on Social Philosophy.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 83 (April 1858): 416–27. The Online Books Page. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Rev. of Cranford. Examiner (23 July 1853): 467–68. Rpt. in Easson, ed. 195–97.Google Scholar
Croskery, Margaret Case. “Mothers without Children, Unity without Plot: Cranford's Radical Charm.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 52.2 (Sept. 1997): 198–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1886. Google Books. Web. 25 May 2013.Google Scholar
Easson, Angus, ed. Elizabeth Gaskell: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Freeland, Natalka. “Ruth's Perverse Economies: Women, Hoarding, and Expenditure.” English Literary History 70.1 (Spring 2003): 197–221.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of English Fiction: Social Discourse and Narrative Form 1832–1867. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. Cranford. Ed. Ingham, Patricia. London: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. Mary Barton: A Tale of Manchester Life. Ed. Gill, Stephen. London: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. Ruth. Ed. Easson, Angus. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen. “Introduction.” Mary Barton. By Elizabeth Gaskell. 9–28.Google Scholar
Greg, W. R. “False Morality of Lady Novelists.” National Review 8 (January 1859): 144–67. Rpt. in Literary and Social Judgments. Vol 1. Trübner, 1877. HathiTrust Digital Library. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Greg, W. R.. “Why Are Women Redundant?” National Review 14 (April 1862): 434–60. Google Books. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Herman, David, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda K., and Lund, Michael. Victorian Publishing and Mrs. Gaskell's Work. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 1999.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia. “Introduction.” Cranford. By Elizabeth Gaskell. xiii–xxx.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia. Note on the Text. Cranford. By Elizabeth Gaskell. xxxiv-xxxviii.Google Scholar
Keen, Suzanne. Victorian Renovations of the Novel: Narrative Annexes and the Boundaries of Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Rev. of Mary Barton. British Quarterly Review 9 (1 February 1849): 117–36. Rpt. in Easson, ed. 102–18.Google Scholar
Rev. of Mary Barton. Economist 6 (25 November 1848): 1337–38. Rpt. in Easson, ed. 77–78.Google Scholar
Matus, Jill L. Unstable Bodies: Victorian Representations of Sexuality and Maternity. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie. Outside the Pale: Cultural Exclusion, Gender Difference, and the Victorian Woman Writer. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Mulvihill, James. “Economies of Living in Mrs. Gaskell's Cranford.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 50.3 (December 1995): 337–56.Google Scholar
Niles, Lisa. “Malthusian Menopause: Aging and Sexuality in Elizabeth Gaskell's Cranford.” Victorian Literature and Culture 33.1 (2005): 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Norman. A Dickens Companion. New York: Schocken Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Recchio, Thomas. Elizabeth Gaskell's “Cranford”: A Publication History. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Talia. “Craft, Authorial Anxiety, and ‘The Cranford Papers.’” Victorian Periodicals Review 38.2 (Summer 2005): 222–39.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary. “Dickens and Plot.” Palgrave Advances in Dickens Studies. Ed. Bowen, John and Patten, Robert L.. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Sir Walter. Redgauntlet. Oxford and New York: Oxford World's Classics, 1998. Amazon. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Stoneman, Patsy. Elizabeth Gaskell. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1987. Google Books. Web. 1 May 2012.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford World's Classics, 1999.Google Scholar
Vlock, Deborah. Dickens, Novel Reading, and the Victorian Popular Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar