Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T07:33:22.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photography as Knowledge Infrastructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2024

Andrea Kaston Tange*
Affiliation:
Macalester College, Minnesota, United States

Abstract

Photography may seem primarily a technology of image-making, but it was in fact a powerful mode of meaning-making in the nineteenth century, and its operation as such was actively under negotiation from its invention. This essay examines the photograph's status as both documentary object and artistic expression, drawing on examples including journalistic, political, and familial uses of the medium as well as the forms of entertainment it provided. As a force of knowledge production—whether helping consolidate emerging sentimental ideals of family relations, forwarding anthropological understandings of the world, or supporting the work of spiritualists claiming to commune with the dead—photography was used to clarify and shape people's ideas about phenomena they did not understand and often otherwise could not see. As such, it became a vital infrastructure for the transmission of culture and the consolidation of national identity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Belknap, Geoffrey. “Photographs in Text: The Reproduction of Photographs in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Communication.” In Photography and Other Media in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Leonardi, Nicoletta et al., 131–46. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carville, Justin. “Mr Lawrence's Great Photographic Bazaar: Photography, History and the Imperial Streetscape.” Early Popular Visual Culture 5, no. 3 (2007): 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, William. The Keepers of Light: A History and Working Guide to Early Photographic Processes. New York: Morgan & Morgan, 1979.Google Scholar
[Eastlake, Lady Elizabeth]. “Photography.” London Quarterly Review 101 (April 1857): 241–55.Google Scholar
(From a Correspondent). “The Stereoscope.” The Illustrated London News, 20, no. 500 (March 20, 1852): 229–30.Google Scholar
Kang, Inhye. “Visual Technologies of Imperial Anthropology: Tsuboi Shōgorō and Multiethnic Japanese Empire.” Positions: Asia Critique 24, no. 4 (2016): 761–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimon, Vered. Singular Images, Failed Copies: William Henry Fox Talbot and the Early Photograph. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelangoskie, Susan. “Domesticity in the Darkroom: Photographic Process and Victorian Romantic Narratives.” LIT: Literature Interpretation Theory 24, no. 2 (2013): 93111.Google Scholar
Spinner, Cheryl. “The Spell and the Scalpel: Scientific Sight in Early 3D Photography.” J19: The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists 3, no. 2 (2015): 436–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiegler, Bernd. “Photographs from the Shadowy Realm: Photography and Spiritualism.” In Arthur Conan Doyle and Photography: Traces, Fairies and Other Apparitions, translated by Filkins, Peter, 137209. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Tange, Andrea Kaston. “Gestures of Connection: Victorian Technologies of Photography and Visible Mothering.” Victorian Studies 65, no. 2 (2023): 193225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lin. “A Lady's Guide to Spectral Etiquette: Domestic Science in Georgiana Houghton's Séance Diaries.” Women's Writing 29, no. 2 (2022): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar