Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:08:08.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Opium Trade and Little Dorrit: A Case of Reading Silences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Wenying Xu
Affiliation:
Northeast Missouri State University

Extract

Nationalism and imperialism in nineteenth-century European literature, located within a theoretical framework of Self/Other, have been the subject of much recent interest. Such projects focus chiefly on representations of the Other in descriptions, images, and evaluations. Sometimes, however, the affirmation of the national Self in such literature is achieved by the total or near total obliteration of the Other. In such cases it is on non-representations, or to use Macherey's word “silences,” that one's reading of such texts must be focused if their nationalistic and imperialistic character is to be exposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Achebe, Chinua. “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness.” Heart of Darkness. Norton, Critical Edition. New York: Norton, 1988.Google Scholar
Alloula, Malek. The Colonial Harem Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arac, Jonathan, ed. Micropolitics of Nineteenth-Century Literature. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, John. The Infection of Thomas De Quincey. New Haven: Yale UP, 1991.Google Scholar
“British Intercourse with China.” Eclectic Magazine 4 (March 1845): 382–92.Google Scholar
SirDavis, John Francis. “Relations of England with China.” Edinburgh Review 98 (07 1853): 98131.Google Scholar
de Quincey, Thomas. “Coleridge and Opium Eating.” De Quincey's Collected Writings. Vol. 5. London: A & C Black, 18961897. 179214.Google Scholar
de Quincey, Thomas. “The Opium Question with China in 1840.” De Quincey's Collected Writings. Vol. 14. London: A & C Black, 18961897. 165218.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Little Dorrit. New York: Oxford UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Mystery of Edwin Drood. New York: Oxford UP, 1956.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “The Chinese Junk.” Miscellaneous Papers. Vol. 18 of The Works of Charles Dickens. National Library Edition. New York: Biglow, Brown.Google Scholar
Dodd, George. “Opium: Chapter the Second, China.” Household Words 16 (22 08 1857): 181–85.Google Scholar
Eames, James B.The English in China. London: Curson, 1909.Google Scholar
Eames, James B.East India Company—China Question.” Edinburgh Review 52 (01 1831): 281322.Google Scholar
Eldridge, C. C.British Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Macmillan, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Susan. The Reader in the Dickens World. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
Mallalien, Alfred. “War with China, and the Opium Question.” Blackwood's Magazine 47 (03 1840): 368–74.Google Scholar
Morley, Henry, “China with a Flaw in It.” Household Words 5 (3 07 1852) 368–74.Google Scholar
“The Opium Trade with China.” Fraser's Magazine 20 (November 1839): 572–88.Google Scholar
“The Opium War and Its Injustice.” Christian Examiner 30 (May 1841): 223–37.Google Scholar
Perera, Suvendrini. Reaches of Empire: The English Novel from Edgeworth to Dickens. New York: Columbia UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Raskin, Johan. The Mythology of Imperialism. New York: Random House, 1971.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. “Jane Austen and Empire.” Raymond Williams, Critical Perspective. Ed. Eagleton, Terry. Boston: Northeastern UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Shirokauer, Conrad. A Brief History of Chinese and Japanese Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1978.Google Scholar