Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T07:44:48.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heredity's Aesthetic Infrastructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2024

Amy R. Wong*
Affiliation:
Dominican University of California, United States

Abstract

This essay traces a disjointed aesthetics of hereditary units in Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure (1895) and Chinese filmmaker Wang Xiaoshuai's So Long, My Son (2019) and argues that shared social and economic conditions of Victorian Britain and postsocialist China prompt similar ruptures of social realism's totalizing aspirations. The novel and the film are mutually concerned with tragedies of biopolitical management and doomed lineages, but at the same time they both employ an aesthetics of leapings and projections—also featured in Hardy's 1917 poem “Heredity”—that argues for the value of an individual life based on a radical divestment from personhood itself, in favor of the gene's mindless jumps through unmapped space and time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Dikötter, Frank. Imperfect Conceptions: Medical Knowledge, Birth Defects and Eugenics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. “Heredity.” In Moments of Vision and Miscellaneous Verses. London: Macmillan, 1917.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Jude the Obscure. 1895. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016.Google Scholar
McGrath, Jason. “A Long Take on Post-Socialist Realism.” In Chinese Film: Realism and Convention from the Silent Era to the Digital Age, 241–80. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Steinlight, Emily. Literary Form and the Politics of Surplus Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy R. “Reading Enclosure and the Global Commons in Jia Zhangke's A Touch of Sin (2013).” Mediations: Journal of the Marxist Literary Group 34, no. 2 (2021): 7178.Google Scholar