Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:56:52.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

H. G. Wells's Plant Plot: Horticulture and Ecological Narration in The Time Machine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

Mary Bowden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

H. G. Wells's The Time Machine (1895) imagines the environmental consequences of two important Victorian horticultural trends: artificial selection and selective breeding. Victorian horticulturalists glorified these techniques as steps toward the subjugation of the natural environment. This horticultural narrative of environmental control seemingly reaches its apex in the novel's future world of 802,701: Wells's Time Traveller believes he has entered an environment perfectly engineered to suit human needs. While critical attention has typically focused on the novel's humans, I use its engagement with contemporary horticulture to describe a plant-centered plotline. Building on critical work that argues for the possibility of nonhuman narrative agency, I read the novel's plants as minor characters. I argue that Wells's novel pits its plant and human characters against one another in competing plotlines, in a narrative refraction of ecological competition. Earlier ecocritical analyses of Victorian works have pointed to the harmonious entanglement of humans with the nonhuman vegetal environment. I argue that ecological competition, as exemplified both in horticultural narratives’ descriptions of environmental subjugation and in Wells's competing plant and human plots, was also a significant source of inspiration for Victorian environmental depictions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , Fall 2019 , pp. 603 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Ivan Kreilkamp, Monique Morgan, the editors of Victorian Literature and Culture, and the journal's anonymous reviewer for their generous and incisive comments on this piece.

References

Works Cited

Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Browne, Janet. Charles Darwin: The Power of Place. New York: Knopf, 2002.Google Scholar
Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Burbidge, F. W. Cultivated Plants: Their Propagation and Improvement. Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1877.Google Scholar
Burbidge, F. W. “The Narcissus.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 11 (1889): 70–92.Google Scholar
Carter, Tom. The Victorian Garden. London: Cameron Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Cohen, William A. “Arborealities: The Tactile Ecology of Hardy's Woodlanders.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 19 (2014): 1–19.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Edited by Bynum, William. 1859. New York: Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. 1868. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Davies, Jennifer. The Victorian Flower Garden. New York: Norton, 1991.Google Scholar
Davies, Jennifer. The Victorian Kitchen Garden. New York: Norton, 1987.Google Scholar
“Discussion.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 11 (1889): 216–17.Google Scholar
Drayton, Richard. Nature's Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the “Improvement” of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Elliott, Brent. Victorian Gardens. Portland: Timber, 1986.Google Scholar
Haynes, Roslynn D. H. G Wells: Discoverer of the Future. London: Macmillan, 1980.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William Carew. Gleanings in Old Garden Literature. London: Elliot Stock, 1887.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Anne. The English Garden and National Identity: The Competing Styles of Garden Design, 1870–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Herbert, William. “On Crosses and Hybrid Intermixtures in Vegetables.” In Amaryllidaceae: Preceded by an Attempt to Arrange the Monocotyledonous Orders, and Followed by a Treatise on Cross-Bred Vegetables and Supplement, 335–80. London: Ridgway, 1837.Google Scholar
Hibberd, Shirley. “The Origin of the Florist's Dahlia.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 13 (1891): 1–14.Google Scholar
Horner, F. D. “The Auricula.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 11 (1889): 107–15.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. “Evolution and Ethics. Prolegomena.” In Evolution and Ethics: And Other Essays, 1–45. Vol. 9 of Collected Essays. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Iovino, Serenella, and Oppermann, Serpil. “Material Ecocriticism: Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity.” Ecozon @ 3, no. 1 (2012): 75–91.Google Scholar
Kern, Robert. “Ecocriticism: What Is It Good For?” ISLE 7, no. 1 (2000): 9–32.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.” New Literary History 45, no. 1 (2014): 1–18.Google Scholar
Lindley, John. Introduction to A Guide to the Orchard and Kitchen Garden; or, An Account of the Most Valuable Fruit and Vegetables Cultivated in Great Britain, by Lindley, George, edited by Lindley, John, vii–xxviii. London: Longman, 1831.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, Allen. Victorian Literature, Energy, and the Ecological Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Norman and Jeanne, . H. G. Wells: A Biography. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973.Google Scholar
McLean, Steven. The Early Fiction of H. G. Wells: Fantasies of Science. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2009.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. “Dendrography and Ecological Realism.” Victorian Studies 58, no. 4 (2016): 696–718.Google Scholar
Morton, Peter. The Vital Science: Biology and the Literary Imagination, 1860–1900. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
Page, Michael R. The Literary Imagination from Erasmus Darwin to H. G. Wells: Science, Evolution, and Ecology. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Paul, William. “On the Grouping of the Garden Varieties of Roses.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 11 (1889): 175–85.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. “Speculative Naturalism and the Problem of Scale: Richard Jefferies's After London, after Darwin.” Modern Language Quarterly 76, no. 1 (2015): 31–56.Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. Foreword to The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, by Darwin, Charles, v–xiii. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Russell, E. John Sir. English Farming. London: William Collins, 1941.Google Scholar
Russell, E. John Sir. A History of Agricultural Science in Great Britain. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966.Google Scholar
Scott, Heidi C. M. Chaos and Cosmos: Literary Roots of Modern Ecology in the British Nineteenth Century. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Scourse, Nicolette. The Victorians and Their Flowers. Portland: Timber Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Secord, James A. “Darwin and the Breeders: A Social History.” In The Darwinian Heritage, edited by Kohn, David, 519–42. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “The Victorian Novel and Horticulture.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Victorian Novel, edited by Rodensky, Lisa, 549–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wagar, W. Warren. H. G. Wells: Traversing Time. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “The Chronic Argonauts.” Appendix to The Early H. G. Wells: A Study of the Scientific Romances, by Bergonzi, Bernard, 187–214. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. Experiment in Autobiography: Discoveries and Conclusions of a Very Ordinary Brain (Since 1866). New York: Macmillan, 1934.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “Extinction.” Chambers's Journal, Sept. 30, 1893, 623–24.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “Letter to T. H. Huxley.” May 1895. In The Correspondence of H. G. Wells, edited by Smith, David C., 1:238. London: Pickering, 1998.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “The Refinement of Humanity.” National Observer, Apr. 21, 1894, 581–82.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. The Time Machine: An Invention. Edited by Ruddick, Nicholas. 1895. Peterborough: Broadview, 2001.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar