Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T23:48:41.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Girls of the Future: Queer Community in Olive Schreiner and Amy Levy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2025

Rachel Hollander Open the ORCID record for Rachel Hollander [Opens in a new window]
Rachel Hollander*
Affiliation:
St. John's University, New York, United States
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite their overlapping fin de siècle New Woman communities in London and their correspondence, few scholars have compared the literary works of South African writer Olive Schreiner and Jewish author Amy Levy directly. Reading allegories from Schreiner's first collection, Dreams (1890), in relation to two of Levy's early verse works, “Xantippe” (1881) and Medea (1884), I argue that they both imagine new futures for queer community as an alternative to the oppressive status quo of imperialist England. This paper suggests that Schreiner and Levy, feminist writers with fraught relationships to Englishness, can best be understood as members of a rich community of late Victorian visionaries. When they turn their attention to the forms of allegory and dramatic monologue, Schreiner and Levy are able to explore radical possibilities for gender and community that did not exist in their real lives or their realist fiction. Schreiner and Levy share a deep skepticism about the benefits of marriage, family, and other conventional sources of community, and both offer queer visions of suspended present states or undetermined futures as alternatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , Spring 2025 , pp. 23 - 48
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Allen, Grant. “The Girl of the Future.” Universal Review 7 (May–August 1890): 49–64.Google Scholar
Beckman, Linda Hunt. Amy Levy: Her Life and Letters. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Beyers, Marike. “Souls in Civilization—Why Do We Struggle to Read Olive Schreiner's Short Fiction and Allegories?” English in Africa 48, no. 1 (2021): 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Barbara, Nations, Carly, and Spydell, Anna. “Introduction.” In Dreams, by Schreiner, Olive, 13–48. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2020.Google ScholarPubMed
Bristow, Joseph. “‘All out of Tune in This World's Instrument’: The ‘Minor’ Poetry of Amy Levy.” Journal of Victorian Culture 4, no. 1 (1999): 76–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, Laura. “Allegory, Feminist Thought, and the Dreams of Olive Schreiner.” In Edward Carpenter and Late Victorian Radicalism, edited by Brown, Tony, 126–50. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Dever, Carolyn. “Everywhere and Nowhere: Sexuality in Victorian Fiction.” In A Concise Companion to the Victorian Novel, edited by O'Gorman, Francis, 156–79. Malden: Blackwell, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Dustin. “‘The rarest, most complex & most lately developed form of aestheticism’: Olive Schreiner, Decadence, and the Aesthetic Education of the Senses.” Feminist Modernist Studies 4, no. 2 (2021): 256–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Leela. Affective Communities: Anticolonial Thought, Fin-de-Siècle Radicalism, and the Politics of Friendship. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gill, Clare. “Olive Schreiner, T. Fisher Unwin and the Rise of the Short Fiction Collection in Britain.” English Literature in Transition 55, no. 3 (2012): 315–38.Google Scholar
Hackett, Robin. Sapphic Primitivism: Productions of Race, Class, and Sexuality in Key Works of Modern Fiction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Harrington, Emily. “‘A Merciful Fury Sent to Save Me’: Amy Levy's ‘Xantippe’ and Women's Conversations.” Victorian Studies 62, no. 2 (2020): 188–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda K. “Discoursing of Xantippe: Amy Levy, Classical Scholarship, and Print Culture.” Philological Quarterly 88, no. 3 (2009): 259–81.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s: Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Simon. LGBT Victorians: Sexuality and Gender in the Nineteenth-Century Archives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusova, Iveta. The New Woman and the Empire. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lake, Carolyn. “‘All the world is blind’: Unveiling Same-Sex Desire in the Poetry of Amy Levy.” In Changing the Victorian Subject, edited by Tonkin, Maggie, Treagus, Mandy, Seys, Madeleine, and Crozier-DeRosa, Sharon, 241–57. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lane, Christopher. The Burdens of Intimacy: Psychoanalysis and Victorian Masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Levy, Amy. Medea. In A Minor Poet and Other Verse, 35–57. 1884. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1891.Google Scholar
Levy, Amy. “Xantippe.” In The Complete Novels and Selected Writings of Amy Levy, 1861– 1889, edited by New, Melvyn, 357–65. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1993.Google Scholar
Livesey, Ruth. Socialism, Sex, and the Culture of Aestheticism in Britain, 1880–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, Scott. “Stages of Sand and Blood: The Performance of Gendered Subjectivity in Olive Schreiner's Colonial Allegories.” In Rereading Victorian Fiction, edited by Jenkins, Alice and John, Juliet, 145–58. New York: Macmillan Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Josephine. Child Murder and British Culture, 1720–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Monsman, Gerald. “Olive Schreiner's Allegorical Vision.” Victorian Review 18, no. 2 (1992): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olverson, T. D. “‘Such Are Not Woman's Thoughts’: Amy Levy's ‘Xantippe’ and ‘Medea.’” In Amy Levy: Critical Essays, edited by Valman, Nadia and Hetherington, Naomi, 110–34. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Randolph, Lyssa. “Verse or Vitality? Biological Economies and the New Woman Poet.” In Amy Levy: Critical Essays, edited by Valman, Nadia and Hetherington, Naomi, 198–220. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sanders, Mark. Complicities: The Intellectual and Apartheid. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Sanders, Mark. “Towards a Genealogy of Intellectual Life: Olive Schreiner's The Story of an African Farm.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 34, no. 1 (2000): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinberg, Cynthia. “Canonizing the Jew: Amy Levy's Challenge to Victorian Poetic Identity.” Victorian Studies 39, no. 2 (1996): 173–200.Google Scholar
Scheinberg, Cynthia. “Recasting ‘sympathy and judgement’: Amy Levy, Women Poets, and the Victorian Dramatic Monologue.” Victorian Poetry 35, no. 2 (1997): 173–91.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. Dreams. 1890. Edited by Barbara Black, Carly Nations, and Anna Spydell. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. “Olive Schreiner to Edward Carpenter, September 1889.” Sheffield Archives, Archives & Local Studies, Sheffield, Olive Schreiner Letters Project transcription (OSLO).Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. “Olive Schreiner to Havelock Ellis, April 23, 1892.” Harry Ransom Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Olive Schreiner Letters Project transcription (OSLO).Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. The Story of an African Farm. 1883. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. Woman and Labour. 1911. London: Virago, 1978.Google Scholar
Symons, Arthur. “Dreams.” The Athenæum 3298 (1891): 46–47.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. “Cosmopolitan Disturbances: Amy Levy in Dresden.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 53, no. 3 (2017): 325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar