Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:50:13.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What if We Contain Multiple Morally Relevant Subjects?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Dustin Crummett Open the ORCID record for Dustin Crummett [Opens in a new window]
Dustin Crummett*
Affiliation:
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

First, I introduce the concept of a “non-agential subject,” where a non-agential subject (1) exists within an organism and (2) has phenomenally conscious experiences in a morally significant way, but (3) is not morally responsible for (some or all of) the organism's voluntary actions. Second, I argue that it's a live possibility that typical adult humans contain non-agential subjects. Finally, I argue that, if there are non-agential subjects, this has important and surprising implications for a variety of ethical issues. Accordingly, ethicists should pay more attention to whether there are non-agential subjects and what their implications for ethics would be.

Type
Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 317 - 334
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhtar, Sahar. 2011. Animal Pain and Welfare: Can Pain Sometimes be Worse for Them Than for Us? In the Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, ed. by Beauchamp, Tom and Frey, R. G. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 495–518.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.003.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim. 2010. The Unity of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215386.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2011. Infinite Ethics. Analysis and Metaphysics, 10: 9–59.Google Scholar
Bruntrup, Godehard, and Jaskolla, Ludwig (eds.). 2017. Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bruntrup, Godehard. 2017. Emergent Panpsychism. In Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Bruntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 48–74.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David. 2017. Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism. In Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Bruntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Chen, Eddy Keming, and Rubio, Daniel. 2020. Surreal Decisions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(1): 54–74.10.1111/phpr.12510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiorando, Marie. 2017. Richard Dawkins: Animals Feel More Intense Pain than Humans. Plant Based News<https://plantbasednews.org/culture/richard-dawkins-animals-feel-more-intense-pain-than-humans/> [accessed Jan. 16, 2021].Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2001. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674029668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan C. W. 2005. Is Consciousness Only a Property of Individual Cells? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(4–5): 60–76.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan C. W. 2006. How Many People are There in My Head? And in Hers? (Exeter: Imprint Academic).Google Scholar
Eklund, Matti. 2020. The Existence of Personites. Philosophical Studies 177(7): 2051–71.10.1007/s11098-019-01298-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Anthony. 2003. A Deterrence Theory of Punishment. Philosophical Quarterly, 53(212): 337–351.10.1111/1467-9213.00316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1965. The Expressive Function of Punishment. The Monist, 49(3): 397–423.10.5840/monist196549326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Christopher C. 1989. The Case Against Mental Duality. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 8(3): 200–18.10.1007/BF02686749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herculano-Houzel, Suzana, et al. 2014. The Elephant Brain in Numbers. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 8(46): 1–9.10.3389/fnana.2014.00046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershenov, David B., and Adam P., Taylor. 2014. Split Brains: No Headache for the Soul Theorist. Religious Studies, 50(4): 487–503.10.1017/S0034412514000109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Hud. 2001. A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).10.7591/9781501725715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2017. The Personite Problem: Should Practical Reason be Tabled? Noûs, 51(3): 617–644.10.1111/nous.12159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 2019. How to Count Animals, More or Less (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/oso/9780198829676.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiserman, Alex. 2019. Stage Theory and the Personite Problem. Analysis, 79(2): 215–22.10.1093/analys/any074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1976. Survival and Identity. In The Identities of Persons, ed. by Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Michael. 2021. Is Consequentialist Perdurantism in Moral Trouble?. Synthese, 198(3): 10979–90.10.1007/s11229-020-02764-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/0195079981.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. 1986. The Society of Mind (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
Mørch, Hedda Hassel. 2019. Is Consciousness Intrinsic? A Problem for the Integrated Information Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26(1–2): 133–62.Google Scholar
Olson, E. T. 2010. Ethics and the Generous Ontology. Theoretical Medical Bioethics, 31: 259–70.10.1007/s11017-010-9148-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereboom, Derk. 2014. Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685516.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puccetti, Roland. 1981. The Case for Mental Duality: Evidence from Split-Brain Data and Other Considerations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(1): 93–123.10.1017/S0140525X00007755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puccetti, Roland. 1989. Two Brains, Two Minds? Wigan's Theory of Mental Duality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(2): 137–44.10.1093/bjps/40.2.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1982. Social Unity and Primary Goods. In Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Sen, by Amartya and Williams, Bernard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 159–86.10.1017/CBO9780511611964.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674042582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevush, Steven. 2006. Single Neuron Theory of Consciousness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 238(3): 704–25.10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.06.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevush, Steven. 2016. The Single-Neuron Theory of Consciousness (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan).10.1007/978-3-319-33708-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, Theodore. 2003. Maximality and Microphysical Supervenience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(1): 139–49.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00247.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 2017. The Hard Problem of the Many. Philosophical Perspectives, 31(1): 449–68.10.1111/phpe.12100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2002. Animal Liberation, 3rd ed. (New York: Harper Collins).Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip. 2021. Derivative Deprivation and the Wrong of Abortion. Bioethics, 35(3): 277–83.10.1111/bioe.12842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, A. P. 2013. The Frustrating Problem for Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies, 165(3): 1097–115.10.1007/s11098-012-0009-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter. 1980. The Problem of the Many. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5: 411–67.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00416.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter. 2006. All the Power in the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195155617.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Mark D. 2011. Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199752232.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Evan G. 2015. The Possibility of an Ongoing Moral Catastrophe. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18: 971–82.10.1007/s10677-015-9567-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yetter-Chappell, Richard. 2015. Value Receptacles. Nous, 49(2): 322–32.10.1111/nous.12023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Dean. 2003. Material People. In The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, ed. by Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 491–526.Google Scholar