Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:36:29.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Reform as Political Reform in the Writings of John Stuart Mill*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Eldon J. Eisenach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Students of Mill's political theory know that he was both a political reformer and a social philosopher. An important part of Mill's life involved political struggles over the electoral franchise and schemes of parliamentary representation, the legal and social emancipation of women, land law and economic policy, and freedom of speech and the press. When turning to his best known writings such as On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, Principles of Political Economy and The Subjection of Women, issues of reform intrude at almost every point. Even his more philosophical writings—Utilitarianism, An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy and System of Logic — can be seen as attacks on or supports for those theories of man and society which Mill sees as hindering or furthering ‘the improvement of mankind’. Moreover, Mill's subsidiary careers as a journalist, editor of the London and Westminster Review and member of parliament further demonstrate his commitment to political reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 242 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author thanks the Earhart Foundation for grant support used in the research for this paper.

References

1 Mill, John Stuart, Autobiography and Literary Essays, eds. Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, Toronto, 1981 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. i), i. 139.Google Scholar

2 Mill, John Stuart, Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill, ed. Mineka, Francis E., 2 vols., Toronto, 1963 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols, xii and xiii), xii. 172.Google Scholar

3 Woods, Thomas, Poetry and Philosophy; A Study in the Thought of John Stuart Mill, London 1961Google Scholar; Sharpless, F. Parvin, The Literary Criticism of John Stuart Mill, The Hague, 1967, pp. 172–241Google Scholar; Alexander, Edward, ‘Mill's Theory of Culture: the Wedding of Literature and Democracy’, University of Toronto Quarterly, xxxv (1965), 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr, Stephen Leo, ‘The Ideology of Antithesis: Science Versus Literature and the Exemplary Case of J. S. Mill’, Modern Language Quarterly, xlii (1981), 247–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Robson, John M., ‘J. S. Mill's Theory of Poetry’, University of Toronto Quarterly, xxix (1960), 420–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, 1780–1950, Garden City, 1960, pp. 53–76Google Scholar; Halliday, R. J., John Stuart Mill, London, 1976, pp. 20–43Google Scholar; and Semmel, Bernard, John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue, New Haven, 1984, pp. 82–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Mill, , Earlier Letters (CW), xii. 169 and 312Google Scholar. And see Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 169 and 177Google Scholar; and ‘Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy’, in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1969 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x), x. 16–17.Google Scholar

5 Annan, Noel, ‘John Stuart Mill’, The English Mind, ed. Davies, Hugh Sykes and Watson, George, Cambridge, 1964, p. 219Google Scholar; and see Carr, , 58Google Scholar; Loesberg, Jonathan, ‘Free Association: Mill's Autobiography as the Fiction of a Philosophy’, Interspace and the Inward Sphere: Essays on the Romantic and Victorian Self, eds. Anderson, Norman A. and Weiss, Margene E., Illinois, 1978, pp. 87–106Google Scholar; and Krook, Dorothea, Three Traditions of Moral Thought, Cambridge, 1959, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar

6 Mill, , ‘Coleridge’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 99Google Scholar; and see Williams, , 53–73Google Scholar; and Eisenach, Eldon J., ‘The Historical Dimension in Bentham's Theory of Law’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, xvi (1983), 290–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Mill, , ‘Bentham’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 90 and 98.Google Scholar

8 Mill, , ‘Bentham’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 98Google Scholar; and see Autobiography (CW), i. 147Google Scholar; and Halliday, R. J., ‘John Stuart Mill's Idea of Polities’, Political Studies, xvii (1970), 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Mill, , Earlier Letters (CW), xii. 205.Google Scholar

10 Mill, , ‘Use and Abuse of Political Terms’, Essays on Politics and Society, ed. Robson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto, 1977 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols, xviii and xix), xviii. 6–7.Google Scholar

11 Mill, , ‘Coleridge’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 121.Google Scholar

12 Mill, , ‘On Genius’, Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 330–33, passimGoogle Scholar. In his Autobiography and Literary Essays following his mental crisis, Mill speaks of ‘rediscovering things known to all the world, which I had previously disbelieved, or disregarded’ (CW), i. 175Google Scholar; and see Annan, Noel, 224–25Google Scholar on Mill's looking to the past.

13 Mill, , Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 115ff.Google Scholar

14 Compare Mill in this respect to liberal Anglicans writing in this period as summarized by Forbes, Duncan, The Liberal Anglican Idea of History, Cambridge, 1952, pp. 12–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and see Eisenach, Eldon J., ‘Mill's Autobiography as Political Theory’, History of Political Thought, viii (1987), 111–29.Google Scholar

15 Mill, , Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 115 and 113.Google Scholar

16 Here, too, Mill shares an ameliorating style with liberal Anglican historians. See Forbes, , Liberal Anglican Idea of History, pp. 89–122Google Scholar; and Altick, Richard D., Victorian People and Ideas, New York, 1973, pp. 238–40.Google Scholar

17 Mill, , Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1978 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xi), xi. 96Google Scholar. These essays originally appeared in The Monthly Repository, 1834–1835Google Scholar. Mill's relationship to this journal and its effect on his view of the appropriate editorial principles for the periodical press is found in Mineka, Francis E., The Dissidence of Dissent; the Monthly Repository, 1806–1838, New York, 1972, pp 271–83 and 321–30.Google Scholar

18 Mill, , Earlier Letters (CW), xiii. 202Google Scholar. Discussion of these principles and Mill's role as editor are found in Packe, Michael St. John, The Life of John Stuart Mill, New York, 1954, pp. 189–247Google Scholar; for a more general discussion of the periodical press in this period see Graham, Walter, English Literary Periodicals, New York, 1966, pp. 208–55Google Scholar; Houghton, Walter E., ‘Victorian Periodicals and the Articulate Classes’, The Victorian Press: Samplings and Soundings, eds. Shattock, Joanne and Wolff, Michael, Leicester and Toronto, 1982, pp. 2–38Google Scholar; and Kent, Christopher, ‘The Higher Journalism and the Mid-Victorian Clerisy’, Victorian Studies, xxiii (1969), 181–98.Google Scholar

19 Mill, , ‘The Gorgias’, Essays on Philosophy and the Classics (CW), xi. 150Google Scholar; and Earlier Letters (CW) xii. 163Google Scholar; and see ‘Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 16Google Scholar; Earlier Letters (CW), xii. 312Google Scholar; and Sharpless, , 196–97.Google Scholar

20 Mill, , ‘Bentham’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 95Google Scholar; A System of Logic, ed. Robson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto, 1974 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols, vii and viii), viii. 842–43Google Scholar; and An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1979 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. ix), ix. 2Google Scholar. For a comprehensive discussion of Mill's psychology, see Hollis, Martin, ‘J. S. Mill's Political Philosophy of Mind’, Philosophy, vii (1972), 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Cumming, Robert Denoon, ‘Mill's History of His Ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, xxv (1964), 235–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eisenach, , ‘Mill's Autobiography as Political Theory’Google Scholar; and de St. Victor, Carole, ‘Mill and the Autobiography of History’, Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens, ii (1980), 1–18Google Scholar, which traces relationships between his autobiography, his psychological theory and his theory of history.

22 Mill, , System of Logic (CW), viii. 123.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., viii. 926.

24 The relationship between the rise of‘higher journalism’ and ideas of intellectual and moral leadership by journalists and ‘men of letters’ is now well established. Gross, John, The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters, London, 1969Google Scholar, is the best survey; and see Knights, Ben, The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, 1978Google Scholar, a study of Coleridge, Carlyle, Arnold and Mill; Houghton, , 3–28Google Scholar; and The Victorian Frame of Mind, New Haven, 1959, chs. 4, 11 and 12Google Scholar; Altick, , Victorian People and Ideas, pp. 238–68Google Scholar; Kent, Christopher, Brains and Numbers; Elitism, ComtismGoogle Scholar, and Democracy in Mid-Victorian England, Toronto, 1978, pp. 3–52 and 104–54Google Scholar; and ‘The Higher Journalism and the Mid-Victorian Clerisy’, Victorian Studies, xiii (1969), 181–98Google Scholar; Harvie, Christopher, The Lights of Liberalism; University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy, London, 1976, pp. 11–49Google Scholar; Heyck, T. W., The Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England, New York, 1982, chs. 1, 2 and 7Google Scholar; and see Sharpless, , 172–78Google Scholar; and Collini, Stefan, ‘Political Theory and the “Science of Society” in Victorian Britain’, The Historical Journal, xxiii (1980), 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Mill, , Earlier Letters (CW), xii. 145.Google Scholar

26 Mill, , ‘On Liberty’, Essays on Politics and Society (CW), xviii. 269Google Scholar and see 274–75.

27 Williams, , 25–8Google Scholar; and see Altick, eh. 7.

28 Mill, , ‘Coleridge’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 117–64Google Scholar; for Carlyle, , Autobiography (CW), i. 145–83 passimGoogle Scholar; and Earlier Letters (CW), i. 133–63 passimGoogle Scholar; and Packe, St. J., pp. 261–64 and 284–87Google Scholar; for Maurice, , Autobiography (CW), i. 159–63Google Scholar; and Packe, St. J., pp. 84, 311, 403 and pp. 44.Google Scholar

29 Megill, Allan D., ‘J. S. Mill's Religion of Humanity and the Second Justification for the Writing of On Liberty’, Journal of Politics, xxxiv (1972), 612–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eisenach, Eldon J., Two Worlds of Liberalism: Religion and Politics in Hobbes, Locke and Mill, Chicago, pp. 169–215Google Scholar; Mueller, Iris Wessel, John Stuart Mill and French Thought, Urbana, 1956, pp. 48–133Google Scholar; Knights, , The Idea of the Clerisy, pp. 140–77Google Scholar; and Leisohn, D. H., ‘Mill and Comte on the Methods of Social Science’, Journal of the History of Ideas, xxxiii (1972), 315–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the more general influence of Comte and St. Simon in England at this time, see Kent, , 55–101Google Scholar; and Simon, W. M., ‘Auguste Comte's English Disciples’, Victorian Studies, viii (1964–1965), 161–72.Google Scholar

30 Mill, , Autobiography (CW), i. 5Google Scholar; and ‘Preface’, Dissertations and Discussions in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 493–94.Google Scholar

31 Megill; Friedman, Richard B., ‘A New Exploration of Mill's Essay On Liberty’, Political Studies, xiv (1966), 288–304Google Scholar; Eisenach, , Two Worlds, pp. 199–205.Google Scholar

32 See note 24, above, and Megill; Friedman; Cowling, Maurice, Mill and Liberalism, Cambridge, 1963Google Scholar; Duncan, Graeme, Marx and Mill, Cambridge, 1973, pp. 258–85Google Scholar; Ten, C. L., ‘Mill and Liberty’, Journal of the History of Ideas, xxx (1969), 47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Letwin, Shirley Robin, The Pursuit of Certainty, Cambridge, 1965, pp. 282–317Google Scholar; and Rees, J. C., ‘Was Mill for Liberty?’, Political Studies, xiv (1966), 72–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and ‘The Reaction to Cowling on Mill’, Mill Newsletter, i (1966), 2–11.Google Scholar

33 Mill, John Stuart, ‘Spirit of the Age’, Newspaper Writings, eds. , Ann P. and Robson, John M., 4 vols., Toronto, 1986 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols, xxii–xxv), xxii. 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and see 238–40 for his discussion of the consequences.

34 Mill, , Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 173Google Scholar. As he put it in ‘Spirit of the Age’: ‘To have erroneous convictions is one evil; but to have no strong or deep-rooted convictions at all, is an enormous one.’ Newspaper Writings (CW), xxii. 233Google Scholar. This same issue is raised in ‘Utility of Religion’, in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 403–28Google Scholar, an essay written towards the end of his life.

35 Mill, , Autobiography and Literary Essays (CW), i. 175.Google Scholar

36 For Mill's recognition of these differences, see ‘Reorganization of the Reform Party’, in Essays on England, Ireland and the Empire, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1982 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. vi), vi. 465–96Google Scholar; and the discussion in Duncan, , Marx and Mill, pp. 223–31.Google Scholar

37 Mill, , ‘Armand Carrel’, Essays on French History and Historians, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1985 (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xx), xx. 170 and 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and see Earlier Letters (CW), xii. 38 and 314Google Scholar; and Sharpless, , 178.Google Scholar

38 Mill, , ‘Armand Carrel’, Essays on French History and Historians (CW), xx. 184.Google Scholar

39 On the adoption of System of Logic in the ancient universities, see Packe, , pp. 271–73Google Scholar; and Letwin, , Pursuit of Certainty, 272Google Scholar; on Mill's influence on university reform, Knights, , 178–213Google Scholar; Harvie, , pp. 50–73Google Scholar; and Kent, , 3–52Google Scholar; for the influence of university men on higher journalism and the relationship of journalistic to academic vocations, see Gross; Jann, Rosemary, ‘From Amateur to Professional: The Case of the Oxbridge Historians’, Journal of British Studies, xxii (1983), 122–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roach, John P. C., ‘Victorian Universities and the National Intelligentsia’, Victorian Studies, iii (1959–1960), 131–50Google Scholar; and Heyck, , Transformation of Intellectual Life, ch. 6.Google Scholar

40 Mill, , ‘Armand Carrel’, Essays on French History and Historians (CW), xx. 183–84.Google Scholar

41 See Mill, 's ‘Spirit of the Age’, Newspaper Writings (CW), xxiiGoogle Scholar. and ‘Utility of Religion’, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (CW), x. 403Google Scholar, and the discussion of these themes in Eisenach, , pp. 169–215Google Scholar; and Megill.

42 Mill, , An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy (CW), ix. 194.Google Scholar