Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2009
How original was the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham? In John Stuart Mill's opinion, not very original at all. Bentham maintained that pleasure and pain should provide our chief criteria of the moral quality of actions, because they are important above all other things in making our lives go well or ill. But two thousand years before Bentham defended the doctrine of utility that ‘all things are good or evil, by virtue solely of the pain or pleasure which they produce”, a gentle and cultivated man had taught in a garden at Athens that the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain were the most fitting objectives in the life of the wise man. The name of this sage, who endeavoured to provide in his own career an exemplar of his doctrine, was Epicurus of Samos. On Mill's reading of history, utilitarianism and Epicureanism were in essential respects the same.
1 Mill, John Stuart, ‘The Protagoras” in Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1978Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, xi. 61Google Scholar; cf. Autobiography, in Autobiography and Literary Essays, ed. Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, Toronto, 1981Google Scholar, CW, i. 49Google Scholar; Utilitarianism in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1970Google Scholar, CW, x. ch. 2.Google Scholar
2 Epicurus: The Extant Remains, ed. Bailey, Cyril, Oxford, 1926Google Scholar, Fragment XXI. All subsequent references to Epicurus's writings will be to this edition, and the following abbreviations will be used: LM Letter to Menoeceus; PD Principal Doctrines; FR Fragments (note: Fragments with Roman numerals are from the Vatican collection); DL Life of Epicurus by Diogenes Laertius.
3 LM, p. 87.Google Scholar
4 LM, p. 91.Google Scholar
5 Causaubon, Meric, Of Credulity and Incredulity, London, 1668, pp. 213, 216.Google Scholar
6 DL, p. 145.Google Scholar
7 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 210.Google Scholar
8 DL, p. 147.Google Scholar
9 Cicero, , De Finibus Bononim et Malorum, ed. and trans. Rackham, H., London, 1967, p. 59.Google Scholar
10 IM, p. 87.Google Scholar
11 PD, VIII.Google Scholar
12 PD, XV.Google Scholar
13 LM, p. 87Google Scholar
14 FR, LIGoogle Scholar (cf. FR, 8).Google Scholar
15 FR, 69, 70.Google Scholar
16 LM, p. 89–91.Google Scholar
17 DL, p. 165.Google Scholar
18 FR, 59.Google Scholar
19 DL, p. 165.Google Scholar
20 Aristotle, for example at Nicomachean Ethics 1173a.Google Scholar
21 Cicero, , De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, Bk. II.Google Scholar
22 DL, p. 169.Google Scholar
23 DeWitt, N. W., Epicurus arid His Philosophy, Minneapolis, 1954, p. 243.Google Scholar
24 LM, p. 89.Google Scholar
25 LM, p. 87.Google Scholar
26 FR, LI.Google Scholar
27 LM, p. 91.Google Scholar
28 Ibid.
29 FR, 23.Google Scholar
30 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 210.Google Scholar
31 Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., London, 1970, p. 40.Google Scholar
32 IM, p. 89.Google Scholar
33 Ibid.; Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 211.Google Scholar
34 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 212Google Scholar; LM, p. 89.Google Scholar
35 DL, p. 147.Google Scholar
36 PD, XXVIIGoogle Scholar; FR, LII.Google Scholar
37 PD, XL.Google Scholar
38 FR, XXIII.Google Scholar
39 Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, Bk. IX.Google Scholar
40 Cicero, , De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, Bk. II.Google Scholar
41 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 218.Google Scholar