Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:36:29.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bentham's Penal Theory in Action: the Case Against New South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

R. V. Jackson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bentham was an influential thinker with an ‘essentially practical mind’. His influence on British social and political reform, however, was indirect, coming largely after his death and largely through the work of his disciples. Bentham's own attempts to put his ideas directly into practice generally had little effect. He came closest to success in the area of penal policy, winning a contract from Pitt's government in the early 1790s to build and manage a penitentiary that was to be organized on the panopticon principle. Bentham saw the penitentiary as the spearhead of prison reform and as a means of effecting a change from transportation to imprisonment as a punishment for serious crime. While Bentham's use of the panopticon principle itself has attracted most attention in the literature, there was more to his scheme than this. The penitentiary proposals were worked out in great detail, they were a conscious application of his theory of punishment, and they were consistent with and an element of his all-embracing plan of social, political, and constitutional reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 226 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John Stuart Mill's description of Bentham in an essay reprinted in Jeremy Bentham: Ten Critical Essays, ed. Parekh, Bhikhu, London, 1974, p 5.Google Scholar

2 Reprinted in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John, 11 vols., Edinburgh, 1838–1843, iv. 1–35.Google Scholar

3 Reference here is to the definitive text edited by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. for The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, London, 1970.Google Scholar

4 Clark, to Bentham, , 31 08 1786Google Scholar, and Wilson, to Bentham, , 24 09 1786Google Scholar, The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. iii, ed. Christie, Ian R., London, 1971 (CW), pp. 488, 491.Google Scholar

5 A detailed account of Bentham's efforts on behalf of the penitentiary project is given in Hume, L. J., ‘Bentham's Panopticon: An Administrative History’, Historical Studies, xv (1973), 703–21, and xvi (1974), 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 The three pamphlets, Panopticon: or, the Inspection-House and Panopticon Postscript, Parts I and II, are reprinted in Bowring, , iv. 37–172.Google Scholar

7 Bentham, to Pitt, , 23 01 1791Google Scholar, The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. iv, ed. Milne, Alexander Taylor, London, 1981 (CW), pp. 223–29.Google Scholar

8 28th Report from the Select Committee on Finance, etc.: Police including Convict Establishments (1798), p. 17Google Scholar. A copy of this report is in vol. iv of the sessional papers for 1810, beginning at p. 375.

9 Report on Police and Convicts, pp. 21–8.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., p. 18.

11 Ibid., p. 20 and App. G.

12 Portland, to Treasury, , 14 10 1799Google Scholar. Bentham's copy of the letter is in the Bentham MSS, UC cxxi. 220Google Scholar, University College London.

13 Bentham, to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 19 06 1800Google Scholar, The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. vi, ed. Dinwiddy, J. R., Oxford, 1984 (CW), pp. 316–19Google Scholar. See also Bowring, , iv. 203.Google Scholar

14 Treasury Board Minutes, 13 08 1800Google Scholar, in Further Proceedings of the Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's Treasury etc. Respecting the Reports of the Committee of Finance (1801), p. 79.Google Scholar

15 Treasury Board Minutes, 18 03 1801Google Scholar, in Further Proceedings, pp. 80–1.Google Scholar

18 Later published as Panopticon versus New South Wales; reprinted in Bowring, , iv. 173–248.Google Scholar

17 Bowring, , iv. 174.Google Scholar

18 An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (CW), p. 158.Google Scholar

19 Bowring, , iv. 174.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 184.

21 Ibid., 6.

22 Ibid., 174.

23 Ibid., 174–76.

24 Ibid., 177.

25 Collins, David, An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales, 2 vols., London, 1798–1802Google Scholar. The second volume appeared when Bentham's work on the Letters was well advanced. Reference here is to the reprint edited by Fletcher, B. H. (Sydney, 1975).Google Scholar

26 Bowring, , iv. 177.Google Scholar

27 Collins, , Account of New South Wales, i, p. xxxviii.Google Scholar

28 Bowring, , iv. 178.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., 179.

30 Collins, , Account of New South Wales, i. 395.Google Scholar

31 This was Bentham's opinion in View of the Hard-Labour Bill (1778)Google Scholar. See Bowring, , iv. 7.Google Scholar

32 Bowring, , iv. 182–83.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., 183–86.

34 UC cxix. 85.Google Scholar

35 UC cxlix. 130, 133.Google Scholar

36 Bowring, , iv. 186–87.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., 191–94.

38 Ibid., 183.

39 An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (CW), pp. 158–59.Google Scholar

40 Bowring, , iv. 174.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., 201.

42 Report on Police and Convicts, App. O.

43 Bowring, , iv. 203–4.Google Scholar

44 What follows is based on my paper, ‘Luxury in Punishment: Jeremy Bentham on the Cost of the Convict Colony in New South Wales’, Australian Historical Studies, xxiii (1988), 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 The material on New South Wales occupies pp. 21–8 of the Report on Police and Convicts. The sheets at UC cxlix. 121–30, 132, and 134 are effectively pp. 23–7Google Scholar of the report. An early draft of p. 22 is on the back of UC cvii. 172Google Scholar. Some material from UC cxlix. 136–45Google Scholar appears in a heavily edited form on p. 28 of the report.

46 Thornton, to Bentham, , two letters of 27 06 1798Google Scholar, Correspondence (CW), vi. 47–9.Google Scholar

47 Colchester Papers, PRO 30/9/32, fol. 226, Public Record Office.

48 UC cl. 359.Google Scholar

49 Perceval, to Abbot, , 30 12 1802Google Scholar, The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. vii, ed. Dinwiddy, J. R., Oxford, 1988 (CW), pp. 180–81, 5n.Google Scholar

50 Reprinted in Bowring, , iv. 249–84.Google Scholar

51 Bentham, to Bentham, Samuel, c.21 08 1802Google Scholar, Correspondence (CW), vii. 90.Google Scholar

52 See, in particular, two articles in the Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society: Campbell, Enid, ‘Prerogative Rule in New South Wales, 1788–1823’, 1 (1964–1965), 161–91Google Scholar, and Atkinson, Alan, ‘Jeremy Bentham and the Rum Rebellion’, lxiv (1978–1979), 1–13.Google Scholar