Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:30:08.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meat Eating and Moral Responsibility: Exploring the Moral Distinctions between Meat Eaters and Puppy Torturers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2020

C. E. Abbate Open the ORCID record for C. E. Abbate [Opens in a new window]
C. E. Abbate*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his influential article on the ethics of eating animals, Alastair Norcross argues that consumers of factory raised meat and puppy torturers are equally condemnable because both knowingly cause serious harm to sentient creatures just for trivial pleasures. Against this claim, I argue that those who buy and consume factory raised meat, even those who do so knowing that they cause harm, have a partial excuse for their wrongdoings. Meat eaters act under social duress, which causes volitional impairment, and they often act from deeply ingrained habits, which causes epistemic impairment. But puppy torturers act against cultural norms and habits, consciously choosing to perform wrongful acts. Consequently, the average consumer of factory raised meat has, while puppy torturers lack, a cultural excuse. But although consumers of factory raised meat aren't blameworthy, they are partially morally responsible for their harmful behavior – and for this, they should feel regret, remorse, and shame.

Type
Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 398 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol. 1990. The Sexual Politics of Meat (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Amato, Paul and Partridge, Sonia. 1989. The New Vegetarians: Promoting Health and Protecting Life (New York: Plenum Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2009. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian Diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109.7: 1266–82.Google Scholar
Arnas, Yasare. 2006. The Effects of Television Food Advertisement on Children's Food Purchasing Requests. Pediatrics International, 48.2: 138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Solomon. 1955. Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American, 193.5: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Henry. 1990. Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edn (St. Paul: West Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Bogueva, Diana and Phau, Ian. 2016. Meat Myths and Marketing. In Impact of Meat Consumption on Health and Environmental Sustainability, ed. by Raphaely, Talia and Marinova, Dora (Hershey: IGI Global), pp. 264–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bove, Caron, Sobal, Jeffrey and Rauschenbach, Barbara. 2003. Food Choices Among Newly Married Couples: Convergence, Conflict, Individualism, and Projects, Appetite 40.1: 25–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, Christopher. 2016. Vegan Soul: Moving Beyond (animal) Meat in Black Communities. In The Future of Meat without Animals, ed. by Donaldson, Brianne and Carter, Christopher (London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 217–28.Google Scholar
Charles, Nickie and Kerr, Marion. 1988. Women, Food and Families (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Cherry, Elizabeth. 2015. I was a Teenage Vegan: Motivation and Maintenance of Lifestyle Movements. Sociological Inquiry, 85.1: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. 1996. Finding Meaning in Dreams: A Quantitative Approach (New York: Plenum Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, Julia. 2011. Consequentialism (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faunalytics. 2015. Study of Current and Former Vegetarians and Vegans (Olympia: Faunalytics).Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1995. Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objection from Justice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55.3: 567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiddes, Nick. 1991. Meat: A Natural Symbol (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Fischer, Bob. 2016. Against Blaming the Blameworthy. In Moral Complexities of Eating Meat, ed. by Bramble, Ben and Fischer, Bob (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 185–98.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, David. 1999. Children's Dreaming and the Development of Consciousness (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl. 2000. The Epistemic Requirements for Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives, 14: 267–77.Google Scholar
Graca, João, Oliveira, Abílio and Calheiros, Maria. 2015. Meat, Beyond the Plate. Data-driven Hypotheses for Understanding Consumer Willingness to Adopt a More Plant-based Diet. Appetite, 90: 80–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, John and Galvin, Richard. 2012. “Pass the Cocoamone, Please”: Causal Impotence, Opportunistic Vegetarianism and Act-Utilitarianism. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 15.3: 368–83.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roxanne and Williams, Joanne. 2017. Childhood Attachment to Pets: Associations Between Pet Attachment, Attitudes to Animals, Compassion, and Humane Behaviour. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14.5: 1–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Hinton, Mary. 2008. Saying Grace: Praying over the Loss of African-American Religious and Food Culture. Religious Education, 103: 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, Gordon and Earle, Megan. 2018. Conservatism Predicts Lapses from Vegetarian/Vegan Diets to Meat Consumption. Appetite, 120: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard-Snyder, Frances. 1997. The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism. Utilitas, 9: 241–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Marvalene. 1997. Soul, Black Women, and Food. In Food and Culture: A Reader, ed. by Counihan, C. and Van Esterik, P. (New York: Routledge), pp. 272–80.Google Scholar
James, Delores. 2004. Factors Influencing Food Choices, Dietary Intake, and Nutrition-Related Attitudes Among African Americans: Application of a Culturally Sensitive Model. Ethnicity and Health, 9.4: 349–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, Aline and Kidd, Robert. 1985. Children's Attitudes Toward Their Pets. Psychological Reports, 57.1: 15–31.Google Scholar
Kunst, Jonas and Hohle, Sigrid. 2016. Meat Eaters by Dissociation: How We Present, Prepare and Talk About Meat Increases Willingness to Eat Meat by Reducing Empathy and Disgust. Appetite, 105.1: 758–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Larsson, Christel, Rönnlund, Ulla, Johansson, Gunnar and Dahlgren, Lars. 2003. Veganism as Status Passage: The Process of Becoming a Vegan Among Youths in Sweden. Appetite, 41 .1: 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lea, Emma and Worsley, Anthony. 2003. Benefits and Barriers to the Consumption of a Vegetarian Diet in Australia. Public Health Nutrition, 6.5: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Neil. 2011. Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, Simon. 2017. Veganism, Normative Change and Second Nature. Environmental Philosophy, 14.2: 221–38.Google Scholar
MacInnis, Cara and Hodson, Gordon. 2017. It Ain't Easy Eating Greens: Evidence of Bias Toward Vegetarians and Vegans from Both Source and Target. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20: 721–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Elinor. 2019. Consequentialism and Moral Responsibility. In Consequentialism: New Directions, New Problems, ed. by Seidel, C. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar
Matheny, Gaverick. 2002. Expected Utility, Contributory Causation, and Vegetarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19.3: 293–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry. 1992. Sharing Responsibility (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Melson, Gail. 2005. Why the Wild Things Are: Animals in the Lives of Children (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Miller, Adrian. 2013. Soul Food: The Surprising Story of an American Cuisine, One Plate at a Time (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Miller, Dale. 2003. Actual-Consequence Act Utilitarianism and the Best Possible Humans. Ratio, 16: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Eric. 2006. Objective Consequentialism, Right Actions, and Good People. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 133.1: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Edward. 1984. The Defence of Necessity: Justification or Excuse? The University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 42.2: 165–83.Google Scholar
Murcott, Anne. 1983. Cooking and the Cooked: A Note on the Domestic Preparation of Meals. In the The Sociology of Food and Eating, ed. by Murcott, Anne (Aldershot: Gower), pp. 178–85.Google Scholar
Norcross, Alastair. 2004. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. Philosophical Perspectives, 18: 229–45.Google Scholar
Alastair, Norcross. 2008. Causal Impotence and Eating Meat. Southwest Philosophy Review, 24.2: 5–10.Google Scholar
Paisley, Judy, Beanlands, Heather, Goldman, Joanne, Evers, Susan and Chappell, Janet. 2008. Dietary Change: What Are the Responses and Roles of Significant Others? Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40.2: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickard, Hanna. 2011. Responsibility Without Blame: Empathy and the Effective Treatment of Personality Disorder. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 18.3: 209–23.Google Scholar
Rees, Jonas, Bamberg, Sebastian, Jäger, Andreas, Victor, Lennart, Bergmeyer, Minja and Friese, Malte. 2018. Breaking the Habit: On the Highly Habitualized Nature of Meat Consumption and Implementation Intentions as One Effective Way of Reducing It. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40.3: 136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, Alison. 1994. Is the Cultural Defense Detrimental to Children? In Law and Anthropology: International Yearbook for Legal Anthropology (Volume 7), ed. by Kuppe, René and Potz, Richard (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), pp. 27–106.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison. 2004. The Cultural Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rogers, Richard. 2008. Beasts, Burgers, and Hummers: Meat and the Crisis of Masculinity in Contemporary Television Advertisements. Environmental Communication, 2.3: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2003. Culpability and Ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103: 61–84.Google Scholar
Rothgerber, Hank. 2013. Real Men Don't Eat (Vegetable) Quiche: Masculinity and the Justification of Meat Consumption. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14.4: 363–75.Google Scholar
Royal Geographical Society. 2018. Meat-Free Men? Men Want to Eat Less Meat but Avoid Vegetarian and Vegan Food in Social Settings, <https://www.rgs.org/about/press-and-media/recent-press-releases/meat-free-men-men-want-to-eat-less-meat-but-avoid/> [accessed 2 February 2020].+[accessed+2+February+2020].>Google Scholar
Ruby, Matthew and Heine, Steven. 2011. Meat, Morals, and Masculinity. Appetite, 56.2: 447–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schösler, Hanna, de Boer, Joop and Boersema, Jan. 2014. Fostering More Sustainable Food Choices: Can Self-Determination Theory Help? Food Quality and Preference, 35: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2005. It's Not My Fault: Global Warmin and Individual Moral Obligations. In Perspectives on Climate Change, ed. by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter and Howarth, Richard (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing), pp. 221–53.Google Scholar
Sliwa, Paulina. 2017. On Knowing What's Right and Being Responsible for It. In Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition, ed. by Robichaud, Philip and Wieland, Jan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 127–45.Google Scholar
Sobal, Jeffery. 2005. Men, Meat, and Marriage: Models of Masculinity. Food and Foodways, 13: 135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Kate and Cole, Matthew. 2009. The Conceptual Separation of Food and Animals in Childhood. Food, Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12.4: 457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Humane Research Council. 2014. Study of Current and Former Vegetarians and Vegans: Initial Findings (Olympia: Faunalytics).Google Scholar
Vegetarian Resource Group. 2019. How Many People are Vegan? <https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/Polls/2019_adults_veg.htm> [accessed 2 February 2020].+[accessed+2+February+2020].>Google Scholar
Witt, Doris. 1999. Black Hunger: Soul Food and America (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Worsley, Anthony and Skrzypiec, Grace. 1998. Teenage Vegetarianism: Prevalence, Social and Cognitive Contexts. Appetite, 30.2: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrenn, Corey. 2016. The Surprising History of John Harvey Kellogg and His War on “Meat.” <http://www.coreyleewrenn.com/the-surprising-history-of-john-harvey-kellogg-and-his-war-on-meat/> [accessed 2 February 2020].+[accessed+2+February+2020].>Google Scholar
Wrenn, Corey. 2018. How to Help When It Hurts? Think Systemic. Animal Studies Journal, 7.1: 149–79.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael. 2017. Ignorance as a Moral Excuse. In Perspectives on Ignorance from Moral and Social Philosophy, ed. by Peels, Rik (Routledge), pp. 77–94.Google Scholar