Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:45.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conservatism Not Much Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 O'Sullivan, Noel, ‘Conservatism: A Reply to Ted Honderich’, Utilitas, pp. 133–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar All following page references, unless otherwise indicated, are to O'Sullivan's article.

2 pp. 133–4.

3 pp. 134–5 and 141–2.

4 p. 142.

5 pp. 135–6.

6 Conservatism, pp. 127–30.Google Scholar

7 Conservatism, p. 127.Google Scholar

8 Conservatism, pp. 188–95 and pp. 110–21.Google Scholar

9 p. 137.

10 pp. 137–8.

11 Conservatism, pp. 232–3.Google Scholar

12 Conservatism, pp. 204–6 and p. 231.Google Scholar

13 Conservatism, p. 235.Google Scholar

14 pp. 138–9.

15 p. 143.

16 pp. 139–40.

17 Conservatism, pp. 208–9 and p. 23.Google Scholar

18 Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London, Macmillan, 1962, p. 116ff.Google Scholar

19 p. 141.

20 p. 140; Conservatism, p. 72.Google Scholar

21 pp. 141–2.

22 p. 142.

23 Quoted by Nisbet, Robert, Conservatism: Dream and Reality, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1986, p. 55.Google Scholar

24 O'Sullivan, , Conservatism, London, Dent, 1976.Google Scholar