No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Conservatism Not Much Reconsidered
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
1 O'Sullivan, Noel, ‘Conservatism: A Reply to Ted Honderich’, Utilitas, pp. 133–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar All following page references, unless otherwise indicated, are to O'Sullivan's article.
2 pp. 133–4.
3 pp. 134–5 and 141–2.
4 p. 142.
5 pp. 135–6.
6 Conservatism, pp. 127–30.Google Scholar
7 Conservatism, p. 127.Google Scholar
8 Conservatism, pp. 188–95 and pp. 110–21.Google Scholar
9 p. 137.
10 pp. 137–8.
11 Conservatism, pp. 232–3.Google Scholar
12 Conservatism, pp. 204–6 and p. 231.Google Scholar
13 Conservatism, p. 235.Google Scholar
14 pp. 138–9.
15 p. 143.
16 pp. 139–40.
17 Conservatism, pp. 208–9 and p. 23.Google Scholar
18 Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London, Macmillan, 1962, p. 116ff.Google Scholar
19 p. 141.
20 p. 140; Conservatism, p. 72.Google Scholar
21 pp. 141–2.
22 p. 142.
23 Quoted by Nisbet, Robert, Conservatism: Dream and Reality, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1986, p. 55.Google Scholar
24 O'Sullivan, , Conservatism, London, Dent, 1976.Google Scholar