Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T15:19:31.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blame, Respect and Recognition: A Reply to Theo van Willigenburg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2005

JOHN SKORUPSKI
JOHN SKORUPSKI
Affiliation:
University of St [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an article in Utilitas Theo van Willigenburg has argued that moral valuation is distinguished from other forms of valuation by the Kantian concept of respect. He criticizes, from that standpoint, an account I put forward, which builds on the connections between moral wrongdoing, blame and withdrawal of recognition. I examine the difference between these two approaches and defend my own.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , November 2005 , pp. 333 - 347
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable