Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:56:04.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Water technology in eighteenth-century London: the London Bridge Waterworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

LESLIE TOMORY*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Classical Studies, McGill University, Room 608, Leacock Building, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2 T7, Canada

Abstract:

The London Bridge Waterworks (LBWW) was founded in 1581 and lasted until the removal of the bridge in 1822. The waterworks was one of the largest water companies in London during this time. In contrast to the other water companies, its history was closely tied to both the bridge itself, as well as the City of London. Its initial growth was linked to the City's expansion, but was more limited in the eighteenth century because its pipes could not reach the expanding suburbs. This article describes the LBWW mostly at its height around 1745, when its surveyor produced a detailed engineering report of its technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Boulton, J., ‘London 1540–1700’, in Clark, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. I: 1540–1840 (Cambridge, 2000), 16Google Scholar.

2 Robert Mylne's notebook, held at the London Metropolitan Archives (hereafter LMA) ACC/2558/NR/13/188, p. 19.

3 Most of the historical attention given to water companies has been directed to the New River. Dickinson, H.W., Water Supply of Greater London, Being a Series of Articles Originally Published in the Engineer in 1948 (Leamington Spa, 1954)Google Scholar; Ward, R., London's New River (London, 2003)Google Scholar; Tynan, N., ‘London's private water supply, 1582–1902’, in Seidenstat, P., Haarmeyer, D. and Hakim, S. (eds.), Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems: Global Lessons for Improving Water Management (New York, 2002)Google Scholar; Sisley, R., The London Water Supply: A Retrospect and a Survey (London, 1899)Google Scholar; Robins, F.W., The Story of Water Supply (Oxford, 1946)Google Scholar; Jenner, M.S.R., ‘From conduit community to commercial network? Water in London 1500–1725’, in Griffiths, P. and Jenner, M. (eds.), Londinopolis: Essays in the Social and Cultural History of Early Modern London (Manchester, 2000)Google Scholar.

4 Keene, D., ‘Issues of water in medieval London to c. 1300’, Urban History, 28 (2001), 161–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jenner, ‘From conduit community to commercial network?’.

5 Grewe, K., Wasserversorgung und- entsorgung im mittelalter. Ein technikgeschichtlicher Überblick (Mainz, 1991)Google Scholar; Grewe, K., ‘Water technology in medieval Germany’, in Squatriti, P. (ed.), Working with Water in Medieval Europe: Technology and Resource-Use (Leiden, 2000)Google Scholar.

6 Tomory, L., ‘London's water supply before 1800 and the origins of network modernity’, Technology and Culture, 56 (forthcoming, 2015)Google Scholar.

7 Thomson, R., Chronicles of London Bridge (London, 1827)Google Scholar; Jackson, P., London Bridge: A Visual History, rev. edn (London, 2002)Google Scholar.

8 See Grewe, Wasserversorgung; Grewe, ‘Water technology’; Moeck-Schlömer, C., Wasser für Hamburg: Die Geschichte der Hamburger Feldbrunnen und Wasserkünste vom 15. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (Hamburg, 1998)Google Scholar.

9 Jenkins, R., ‘Notes on the London Bridge Waterworks’, Antiquary, 12, 243–6 (1895), 261–5Google Scholar.

10 For the negotiations in 1581, see LMA, London Repertory of the Court of Aldermen (hereafter Rep.) 20, pp. 75, 83, 95, 97, 102, 120, 144, 167, 168, 170. The indenture approved by the City, City of London Journal of the Common Council (hereafter Jour.) 21, p. 251, 24 Nov. 1581. Sharpe, R.R., London and the Kingdom: A History Derived Mainly from the Archives at Guildhall in the Custody of the Corporation of the City of London, 3 vols. (London, 1894)Google Scholar, vol. II, 19, letter I, 102, p. 551, 15 Jul. 1580; Rep. 20, pp. 75, 83, 95, 97, 102, 120, 144, 168.

11 Rep. 20, pp. 345 (10 Jul. 1582), 346* (12 Jul. 1582), 368 (15 Oct. 1582), 375 (13 Dec. 1582); details of lease p. 382 (6 Dec. 1582).

12 Rep. 20, p. 170 (16 Feb. 1580/81); Rep. 21, pp. 353 (25 Oct. 1586), 456 (15 Jul. 1587), 467 (20 Sep. 1587?).

13 Rep. 22, p. 22 (30 Jan. 1588/89); British Library (hereafter BL) Add. MS 5063, no. 50, p. 133, 20 Apr. 1667.

14 Jenkins, ‘Notes on the London Bridge Waterworks’, 261–2; Bate, J., The Mysteries of Nature and Art: In Foure Severall Parts, 2nd edn (London, 1635), 57Google Scholar.

15 Reddaway, T.F., ‘London Bridge Waterworks after the Great Fire of 1666’, Transactions of the Newcomen Society, 19 (1938), 217–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 BL Add. MS 5063, no. 50; Jenkins, ‘Notes on the London Bridge Waterworks’.

17 National Archives (hereafter TNA) State Papers 29/229 fol. 205, 1667.

18 Murphy, A.L., The Origins of English Financial Markets: Investment and Speculation before the South Sea Bubble (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar; Scott, W.R., The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish and Irish Joint-Stock Companies to 1720, vol. III (Cambridge, 1910)Google Scholar; Harris, R., Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844 (Cambridge, 2000), ch. 2Google Scholar.

19 Stow, J. and Strype, J., A Survey of the Cities of London and Westminster: Containing the Original, Antiquity, Increase, Modern Estate and Government of those Cities, 2 vols. (London, 1720), vol. II, 27Google Scholar.

20 TNA C5/257/19, p. 7. See also Dickinson, Water Supply of Greater London, 24–5.

21 Jour. 53, pp. 115, 118, 449, 450, 456, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492 (1701); TNA C5/257/19, pp. 31–2; Rep. 106, pp. 492, 519, 542 (1702); Rep. 107, pp. 5, 32, 35, 63, 96, 103, 195, 196, 244, 247 (1702); Rep. 107, pp. 425, 436, 457, 473, 488, 535, 544, 564, 585 (1703); Morris, T., The Case of Thomas Morris, Esq. (London?, 1703)Google Scholar. See also Ward, London's New River, ch. 10.

22 Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts, The Manuscripts of His Grace the Duke of Portland, Preserved at Welbeck Abbey, vol. IV (London, 1897), 51–2; Jour. 63, pp. 366–7, 28 Nov. 1766.

23 Hatton, E., A New View of London: Or, an Ample Account of that City, in Two Volumes, or Eight Sections (London, 1708), vol. II, 791Google Scholar.

24 Ward, London's New River, ch. 10; Brown, J., Reports of Cases, upon Appeals and Writs of Error in the High Court of Parliament; from the Year 1701, to the Year 1779, vol. II (London, 1779), 134–40Google Scholar; Rep. 107, pp. 425 (6 Jul. 1703), 457 (20 Jul. 1703), 488 (29 Jul. 1703); Rep. 108, pp. 127 (3 Feb. 1703/04), 133 (8 Feb. 1703/04); ‘J. Stafford and others, appellants. Mayor, commonalty, &c. of London, respondents. The Appellants case.’, 1719, BL shelfmark 19.h.1.(140.).

25 Hatton, A New View of London, vol. II, 791.

26 Harris, Industrializing English Law.

27 Hatton, A New View of London, vol. II, 791; Beighton, H., ‘A description of the water-works at London-Bridge, explaining the draught of tab. I.’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 37 (1731), 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williamson, F., ‘Sorocold of Derby, a pioneer of water supply’, Journal of the Derbyshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 10 (1936), 4393Google Scholar.

28 Hatton, A New View of London, vol. II, 792.

29 Jour. 57, p. 233, 29 Jun. 1731.

30 LMA ACC/2558/MW/C/15/291/01, 23 Jun. 1738.

31 Report on the state of the London Bridge Water Works, LMA ACC/2558/MW/C/15/102 (hereafter RLW), 2, 29 Sep. 1745.

32 Ibid., 4–5.

33 King, P., ‘The production and consumption of bar iron in early modern England and Wales’, Economic History Review, 58 (2005), 20–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Beighton, ‘A description of the water-works at London-Bridge’; see also Dickinson, Water Supply of Greater London, 26–8.

35 RLW, 15–22.

36 Ibid., 19–22.

37 Ibid., 23–8.

38 Ibid., 29–31.

39 Ibid., 33.

40 Ibid., 10.

41 Ibid., 7–15.

42 Ibid., 35–9.

43 Ibid., 38–9.

44 Ibid., 45–6.

45 Ibid., 49–50.

46 Ibid., 51.

47 Ibid., 50–3.

48 Ibid., 53–5.

49 Ibid., 57–4.

50 Ibid., 57–9.

51 Ibid., 58.

52 LMA ACC/2558/MW/C/15/291/01, 23 Jun. 1738.

53 LMA ACC/2558/NR/13/041, p. 23.

54 RLW, 121.

55 Ibid., 122–5.

56 Ibid., 43, 122–5.

57 Schwarz, L.D., London in the Age of Industrialisation: Entrepreneurs, Labour Force, and Living Conditions, 1700–1850 (Cambridge, 1992), 66–7Google Scholar.

58 RLW, 122–5.

59 Smeaton, J., Reports of the Late John Smeaton, F.R.S., Made on Various Occasions in the Course of his Employment as a Civil Engineer, 3 vols. (London, 1812), vol. II, 29ffGoogle Scholar; LBWW minute book 2, LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/002, p. 3, 3 Nov. 1779.

60 Maitland, W., The History of London from its Foundation by the Romans, to the Present Time (London, 1739), 167Google Scholar.

61 Report from 1771, Smeaton, Reports of the Late John Smeaton, vol. II, 29–30.

62 Thomson, Chronicles of London Bridge, 552–6; Jour. 63, pp. 369–70, 28 Nov. 1766.

63 Jour. 63, p. 362, 28 Nov. 1766; Jour. 64, p. 86, 16 Dec. 1766; Thomson, Chronicles of London Bridge, 555–60.

64 Jour. 64, pp. 119–24, 25 Feb. 1767.

65 Ibid., pp. 128–9, 13 Mar. 1767.

66 Ibid., pp. 152–60, 23 Jun. 1767.

67 Smeaton, Reports of the Late John Smeaton, vol. II, 22ff; Dickinson, Water Supply of Greater London, 28–9.

68 LBWW minutes 2, LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/002, p. 19, 3 Nov. to 17 Dec. 1779; LBWW minutes 3, LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/003, 3 Nov. to 10 Nov. 1780, Jul. 1782.

69 LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/002, 10 Dec. 1779.

70 LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/003, 26 Mar. 1784, 21 May 1784, 30 Jun. 1786.

71 Leonard Schwarz, ‘London 1700–1840’, in Clark (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. II, 648.

72 LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/003, 22 Oct. 1784, 26 Nov. 1784; LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/004, 14 Nov. 1794.

73 Scott, The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish and Irish Joint-Stock Companies, vol. III, 16; LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/004, 14 Nov. 1794; LMA ACC/2558/LB/01/005, 16 Nov. 1798.