Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:58:25.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visualization, decentralization and metropolitan improvement: ‘light-and-air’ and London County Council photographs, 1899–1908

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2013

DAVID ROONEY
DAVID ROONEY*
Affiliation:
Social and Cultural Geography Research Group, Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, TW20 0EX, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In the 1890s, the London County Council began a project to photograph old buildings in the capital. The common interpretation is that this was preservationist activity to record architectural treasures being ‘lost’. However, after 1899, many images appear not to fit neatly into a story of selective preservation. By examining metropolitan improvement schemes and the politics of housing, this article examines alternative contexts in which the images were made. It suggests the photographs acted in political dialogues about geographies of light and air, time and space, and the right place of working Londoners, as well as more mundane concerns over spending.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 462 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On the housing of working Londoners, see Jones, G. Stedman, Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship between Classes in Victorian Society (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar, especially Part II; on the battle between inner city and suburban rehousing, see Yelling, J., ‘L.C.C. slum clearance policies, 1889–1907’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, n.s., 7 (1982), 292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Yelling, J., Slums and Slum Clearance in Victorian London (London, 1986)Google Scholar, especially chs. 3 and 4; on the politics of the LCC at this time, see Davis, J., ‘The progressive council, 1889–1907’, in Saint, A. (ed.), Politics and the People of London: The London County Council 1889–1965 (London, 1989), 27–48Google Scholar; and on the LCC's ‘dispersal’ policy, see A. Saint, ‘“Spread the people”: the LCC's dispersal policy, 1889–1965’, in Saint (ed.), Politics and the People of London, 215–36.

2 Cited in Booth, C., Improved Means of Locomotion as a First Step towards the Cure of the Housing Difficulties of London . . . (London, 1901), 1Google Scholar.

3 Cited in Booth, Improved Locomotion, 2.

4 ‘Conference on the housing of the working classes’, British Architect (London, 3 Aug. 1900), 85; on the Boundary Street estate, see London County Council, Opening Ceremony by His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales of the Boundary Street Area, Bethnal Green (London, 1900)Google Scholar; and Steffel, R.V., ‘The Boundary Street estate: an example of urban redevelopment by the London County Council, 1889–1914’, Town Planning Review, 47 (1976), 161–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 London County Council, Annual Report of the Proceedings, 1892–94. As housing chairman, Beachcroft was involved with the rehousing caused by the building of the Blackwall Tunnel (completed 1897) which proved hard to let and led to attempts to dilute the statutory housing requirement.

6 Anonymous, ‘Obituary: Sir R.M. Beachcroft’, Times, London, 13 Jan. 1926, 14.

7 Bowmaker, E., ‘The housing of the working-classes’, New Century Review (London, Mar. 1897), 250Google Scholar.

8 See Schivelbusch, W., The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century (Berkeley, CA, 1986)Google Scholar.

9 The second industrial revolution was a term coined by Patrick Geddes as early as 1915. See for instance Bud, R.et al., Inventing the Modern World: Technology since 1750 (London, 2000), ch. 5Google Scholar.

10 House of Commons, ‘Housing of the Working Classes Act (1890) Amendment Bill, Second Reading, HC Deb. 17 May 1900, vol. 83, cc. 427–523’, cc. 517–19.

11 See especially Galison, P., Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps: Empires of Time (London, 2003)Google Scholar; Kern, S., The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918 (Cambridge, MA, 1983)Google Scholar; and Schivelbusch, Railway Journey.

12 Beachcroft, M., Overcrowded London: A Lecture Given in Bermondsey Town Hall, on 23rd November, 1893, for the London Reform Union (London, 1893), 11Google Scholar.

13 Masterman, Charles (ed.), The Heart of the Empire: Discussions of Problems of Modern City Life in England (London, 1901)Google Scholar; see also Driver, F. and Gilbert, D., ‘Heart of empire? Landscape, space and performance in imperial London’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16 (1998), 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for an exploration of Masterman's work and its wider context.

14 Masterman (ed.), Heart of the Empire, 72.

15 Ibid., 78.

16 Ibid., 101 (italics in original).

17 On lightness and social reform, see for instance Tagg, J., ‘God's sanitary law: slum clearance and photography in late nineteenth-century Leeds’, in The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories (London, 1988), 131–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Otter, C., ‘Making liberalism durable: vision and civility in the late Victorian city’, Social History, 27 (2002), 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, raises light-and-air laws at the end of the nineteenth century specifically; and Driver, F., Geography Militant: Cultures of Exploration and Empire (Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar, ch. 8, examines moral urban exploration and the imperial symbolic trope of lightness and darkness. It should be added that public health literatures in the mid-century too show concern for lightness and air, and often offer similarly Biblical rhetoric.

18 Yelling, ‘Slum clearance’, 299; Saint, ‘“Spread the people”’, 219.

19 Beachcroft, M., The Housing of the Poor: A Paper Read at the Church Congress, London, October, 1899 (London, 1899), 7Google Scholar.

20 Shaw-Lefevre, G., ‘London Street improvements’, Contemporary Review (London, Jun. 1899), 213Google Scholar.

21 Winter, J., London's Teeming Streets (London and New York, 1993), 207–16Google Scholar; Schubert, D. and Sutcliffe, A., ‘The “Haussmannization” of London? The planning and construction of Kingsway-Aldwych, 1889–1935’, Planning Perspectives, 11 (1996), 115–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; London County Council, Opening of Kingsway and Aldwych by His Majesty the King, Accompanied by Her Majesty the Queen (London, 1905)Google Scholar.

22 Winter, Teeming Streets, 208–9.

23 On the Society for Photographing the Relics of Old London, see Flukinger, R., The Formative Decades: Photography in Great Britain 1839–1920 (Austin, TX, 1985), 74Google Scholar; Haworth-Booth, M., The Golden Age of British Photography, 1839–1900 (New York, 1984), ch. 8Google Scholar; and Foote, K., ‘Relics of old London: photographs of a changing Victorian city’, History of Photography, 11 (1987), 133–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; the photographs have been reprinted in Bush, Graham (ed.), Old London (London, 1975)Google Scholar; finally, see Westerbeck, C. and Meyerowitz, J., Bystander: A History of Street Photography (London, 1994), 99–101Google Scholar, for the situation outside London.

24 Foote, ‘Relics’, 138.

25 Hobhouse, H., London Survey'd: The Work of the Survey of London 1894–1994 (Swindon, 1994)Google Scholar; Hobhouse, H., Lost London: A Century of Demolition and Decay (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Godfrey, W.H., ‘The London Survey Committee, 1894–1952’, London Topographical Record, 21 (1958), 79–92Google Scholar; Davies, P., Lost London 1870–1945 (Croxley Green, 2009)Google Scholar; Zemgulys, A., ‘Building the vanished city: conservationism in turn-of-the-century London’, Nineteenth Century Prose, 26 (1999), 35–58Google Scholar.

26 Swenson, A., ‘Founders of the National Trust (act. 1894–1895)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar.

27 London County Council, Opening of Kingsway.

28 Nead, L., Victorian Babylon: People, Streets and Images in Nineteenth-Century London (New Haven and London, 2000), 32Google Scholar.

29 Klingender, F. and Elton, A., Art and the Industrial Revolution, revised and extended edn (London, 1968), 85Google Scholar; on the picturesque in photography, see Haworth-Booth, Golden Age, ch. 3.

30 Winter, Teeming Streets, 212.

31 London County Council, Opening of Kingsway, 32.

32 Nead, Babylon, 32.

33 Nead, L., ‘Animating the everyday: London on camera circa 1900’, Journal of British Studies, 43 (2004), 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Zemgulys, ‘Vanished city’, 52; See also Zemgulys, A., ‘“Night and day is dead”: Virginia Woolf in London “literary and historic”’, Twentieth Century Literature, 46 (2000), 56–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Zemgulys, ‘Vanished city’.

36 Zemgulys, ‘Night and day’, 60.

37 Davies, Lost London, 26.

38 ‘Photographs of site of the Rotherhithe Tunnel, East London’, London Metropolitan Archives, LMA/4208/001; ‘Photograph library: streets’, London Metropolitan Archives, SC/PHL/01/boxes 035–041.

39 On the record photography of Victorian construction projects, see Chrimes, M., Civil Engineering 1839–1889: A Photographic History (Stroud, 1991)Google Scholar, especially ch. 1; for industrial photography more widely, see Davies, Sue and Collier, Caroline (eds.), Industrial Image: British Industrial Photography 1843 to 1986 (London, 1986)Google Scholar, especially ch. 1; for the pictorial tradition from which the ‘record picture’ borrowed, see Collins, M., Record Pictures: Photographs from the Archives of the Institution of Civil Engineers (Gottingen, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and for commercial photography, see Nye, D., Image Worlds: Corporate Identities at General Electric (Cambridge, MA, 1985)Google Scholar, ch. 3; finally, on the use of record photography by the state, see Tagg, The Burden of Representation, chs. 2 and 3.

40 Memo, chemist to Improvements Committee, 17 Jan. 1899, in ‘LCC Improvements Committee, presented papers, Jan.–Feb. 1899’, London Metropolitan Archives, LCC/MIN/07888.

41 For a revealing examination of the role of surveyors’ evidence in light-and-air law at the start of London's building boom, see Kerr, R., On Ancient Lights and the Evidence of Surveyors Thereon (London, 1865)Google Scholar.

42 Minutes for 18 Jan. 1899, in ‘LCC Improvements Committee, signed minutes, 1899’, London Metropolitan Archives, LCC/MIN/07820.

43 LCC Improvements Committee report, 23 Jan. 1900, in ‘LCC minutes of proceedings, 1900’, 65–6, London School of Economics Library.

44 Minutes for 28 Jul. 1902, in ‘LCC Bridges Committee, signed minutes, 1902–1903’, London Metropolitan Archives, LCC/MIN/01279.

45 ‘LCC Improvements Committee, presented papers, May–June 1899’, London Metropolitan Archives, LCC/MIN/07890.

46 On the take-up of rehousing opportunities, see Dennis, R., ‘“Hard to let” in Edwardian London’, Urban Studies, 26 (1989), 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 On representations of urban dwelling, see for instance Mayne, A., The Imagined Slum: Newspaper Representation in Three Cities, 1870–1914 (Leicester, 1993)Google Scholar; Warner, S.B., ‘The management of multiple urban images’, in Fraser, D. and Sutcliffe, A. (eds.), The Pursuit of Urban History (London, 1983), pp. 383–94Google Scholar.

48 Hobhouse, London Survey'd, 12.

49 Alborn, T., ‘Lubbock, John, First Baron Avebury (1834–1913)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar; Bowden, M., ‘Rivers, Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt- (1827–1900)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar; Barton, R., ‘“Huxley, Lubbock, and half a dozen others”: professionals and gentlemen in the formation of the X Club, 1851–1864’, Isis, 89 (1998), 410–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Cited in Duff, Mrs Adrian Grant (ed.), The Life-Work of Lord Avebury (Sir John Lubbock), 1934–1913 (London, 1924), 220Google Scholar.

51 Cited in Gamble, C. and Moutsiou, T., ‘The time revolution of 1859 and the stratification of the primeval mind’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 65 (2011), 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 See ibid., 46–7, on the crucial role of photographs as new technological forms of trust-building evidence in Lubbock's archaeological project.

53 Patton, M., Science, Politics and Business in the Work of Sir John Lubbock: A Man of Universal Mind (Aldershot, 2007), 149–52Google Scholar; see also Hughes, T.P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore, MD, 1983), 54–8Google Scholar; and Bowers, B., Lengthening the Day: A History of Lighting Technology (Oxford, 1998), 102–3Google Scholar.

54 J. Lubbock, ‘Diary of Lord Avebury 12 March 1879–December 1882’, 124, British Library MS Add. 62682.

55 Ibid., 120; see also ‘International Electric Exhibition at the Crystal Palace’, Illustrated London News, 4 Mar. 1882, 218.

56 Patton, Sir John Lubbock, 152; and Hughes, T.P., ‘British electrical industry lag: 1882–1888’, Technology and Culture, 3 (1962), 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Lubbock, J., Fifty Years of Science (London, 1882), 70Google Scholar.

58 Ibid., 71.

59 Lubbock, J., On Municipal and National Trading (London, 1907), 21Google Scholar.

60 Davis, ‘Progressive council’, 37; Patton, Sir John Lubbock, ch. 14.

61 Davis, J., Reforming London: The London Government Problem 1855–1900 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar, chs. 6 and 7; see also Chamberlain, J., ‘Municipal government: past, present, and future’, New Review, 10 (1894), 649–61Google Scholar.

62 Lubbock, Municipal Trading, 55.

63 Gomme, L., Housing of the Working Classes in London, 1855–1912 (London, 1913), ch. 8Google Scholar.